Internal narrow-band absorption techniques?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I added a resonant branch.
The position is critical.
It seems to me that it has the maximum effect if placed near the exit.
It has a narrow band: damping is required.
Blue: only the empty port;
Brown: adding a 32cm resonant branch;
Violet: adding acrylic in the branch, empty TL
 

Attachments

  • port .jpg
    port .jpg
    74.5 KB · Views: 164
  • portbranchempty.jpg
    portbranchempty.jpg
    73.1 KB · Views: 160
  • portbranchdamped.jpg
    portbranchdamped.jpg
    69.4 KB · Views: 169
It seems to me to retrace the history of electroacoustics ... 🙂
Some figures moving a cylinder of heavy absorbent 12cm, along the pipe, stuffed box:
green: in the throat
brown: intermediate position
blue: intermediate position
black: to the mouth
yellow: empty pipe
 

Attachments

  • pasticca.jpg
    pasticca.jpg
    45.7 KB · Views: 152
  • ads.jpg
    ads.jpg
    134.8 KB · Views: 77
... and what about a FRB?

A Helmholtz resonator acts as a bass band. A tube closed at one end resounds at the fundamental frequency and harmonics.
Resonances in boxes often contain fundamental and harmonics.
Why prefer Helmholtz?
How does a fluted resonant branch behave?
Will it have one or two frequencies of action?
If they are multiple, will they be independent or related?
Will it be possible to use a FRB to increase the bandwidth of a resonant pipe adsorber?
 

Attachments

  • FRB.jpg
    FRB.jpg
    46.9 KB · Views: 67
The resonance group 0.7-1.5 kHz originates in the box.
I tried to use helmholtzen, branches, different fillings, but I have the best result by covering the free walls with 4cm of polyurethane.
Blue: empty box
green: 4cm polyurethane over 3 walls
Any experience?
 

Attachments

  • fin.jpg
    fin.jpg
    91.3 KB · Views: 65
Status
Not open for further replies.