The IC's supporting PRACTICAL servos of audio equipment started in the late 70's, when the price of jfet input IC's went down low enough.
Chopper stabilization and servos far predate audio in the precision instrumentation field.
10 mV would be -72 dB re 200 watts into a loudspeaker. Although it seems high that level would be lost when including the normal accuracy in voice coil centering. (Quick calculation predicts less than .001" of offset.)
But if the DC is trimmed to get that level, does it stay stable over temperature changes?
With normal professional amplifiers often having a voltage gain of 20 (26 dB.) that would require a preamp to be 500 microvolts or less. Probably much less as the audio power amplifier will have some contribution.
So where does that leave us, trimmer or servo? Which opamp?
TL072 B grade is 3mV and over temp 5mV - admittedly with 50 Ohms source resistance. Nevertheless, its low enough to get good consistent results. I dial the offset out anyway because the servo opamp output feeds into the amp protection circuit. Measured on the output hot or cold the offset is never more than +- 1.5mV.
Chopper stabilization and servos far predate audio in the precision instrumentation field.
As usual....
I am pretty sure audio predates controlled fire. Or did you mean the use of chopper amplifiers in instrumentation predates the use in audio circuitry? 😉
After using an external trim on an FET input opamp, any idea how much temperature will change things?
Erno Borbely wrote up a project called DC 100 (i think) that would be good reading for folks interested in trying direct coupling
also, look for internal images of some Ayre power amp and preamp products to see some of the transistor coupling strategies that were helpful. probably have to spend a little time figuring out pieces of the schematic to really appreciate that however.
😉
mlloyd1
also, look for internal images of some Ayre power amp and preamp products to see some of the transistor coupling strategies that were helpful. probably have to spend a little time figuring out pieces of the schematic to really appreciate that however.
😉
mlloyd1
... The biggest problem of trying to direct couple amps or preamps is temperature drift. This can be a real engineering challenge ...
...
Erno Borbely wrote up a project called DC 100 (i think) that would be good reading for folks interested in trying direct coupling
also, look for internal images of some Ayre power amp and preamp products to see some of the transistor coupling strategies that were helpful. probably have to spend a little time figuring out pieces of the schematic to really appreciate that however.
😉
mlloyd1
Erno's article was in Audio Amateur 2/84 part two the DC 100.
Opa 189
3 uv offset
17 nv rms 0.1hz to 10hz
100 nv PK to pk 0.1 hz to 10 hz
.00006 thd at 3.5v 1khz
Cheap less than $2
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/opa189.pdf
It's CMOS, cannot sound good 😀.
As usual....
I am pretty sure audio predates controlled fire. Or did you mean the use of chopper amplifiers in instrumentation predates the use in audio circuitry? 😉
After using an external trim on an FET input opamp, any idea how much temperature will change things?
Low enough to be of absolutely no concern in an audio application. On a TC or SG conditioner, a different story however.
You can safely count on 10uV/C Vos drift, but often much lower than this. Watch out for bias current in JFET input opamps with high source resistances though.
Reminds of a comment a politician this side of the pond made about two years ago “people are sick and tired of experts”
As usual....
Yes as usual, AC coupling and forget about it was de rigueur in audio for decades.
Yes, Scott, I was designing DC servos when you were still in hi school. So what?
Yes, so what, someone else was doing it before that. I'm confused though Mr. Marsh claims to have "invented " it in the 70's do you guys disagree?
I had at one time a mechanical chopper stabilized tube amp that predates both of you. I have no irons in the fire here, the "sound" of capacitors is unique to the audio industry, and has no not mattered much to anyone else (unless they could measure the result).
Last edited:
Cmos is noisy.
Used to be, 40 years ago. OPA189 has 5.2nV/rtHz @1KHz, at par with most of the current cheap jfet input op amps.
Cmos is noisy.
Maybe you should look at the datasheet? Maybe you didn’t realize it’s chopper stabilized?
Just because CMOS was too noisy in 1970 or whenever the last time you were curious doesn’t mean it still is. Look at OPA2156.
TLE208X costs about the same, is jfet input, and has double the OPA189 noise http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tle2081a.pdf
O tempora, when I was young and restless, I could guess 75% of a linear IC internal schematic by looking at the metal mask only 😀.
O tempora, when I was young and restless, I could guess 75% of a linear IC internal schematic by looking at the metal mask only 😀.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part III