Salas SSLV1.3 UltraBiB shunt regulator

diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
BTW. Salas what is the lowest voltage I could set with bib ultra? I am wonder if I could power directelly current hungy avcc of es9038pro. Safe is even 3.6V, but i can go as high as 4V with cooling.

As standard built, 5V or bit under is the Ubib's output floor at VR1 minimum (depending on various parts tolerances). Read the build manual I uploaded in post#1.

If you would substitute M2 with a low threshold NMOS like the REF-D's MTP3055VL and jumper short the second LED you could go low towards 3.3V but the also lowered inner voltages will be squeezing J2 & J3's VDS space too much. Maybe with least IDSS samples that have smaller Vgs (off) it could work better. Also put R9 1k. Anyway pushing the 1.3 for too low Vout isn't the target range it was initially designed for to be at its best.
 
The priority was to first make a plug-in upgrade to the many years popular BiB 1.1 so to can advance the already built systems around it and skip its increasingly faked (or increasingly rare and expensive when real) Toshiba JFETS issue. Also to much simplify the pre-configuration. But I don't exclude I will design any additional physical formats for the 1.3 successor if it will nowadays prove as much popular as the 1.1 was.
I know the pinouts are different. Other than that, is there any chance to use the Toshiba 2SK117GR in place of the PF5102? I have a couple hundred of the Toshiba's and would like to use them if I can.

Thanks!!
 
As standard built, 5V or bit under is the Ubib's output floor at VR1 minimum (depending on various parts tolerances). Read the build manual I uploaded in post#1.

If you would substitute M2 with a low threshold NMOS like the REF-D's MTP3055VL and jumper short the second LED you could go low towards 3.3V but the also lowered inner voltages will be squeezing J2 & J3's VDS space too much. Maybe with least IDSS samples that have smaller Vgs (off) it could work better. Also put R9 1k. Anyway pushing the 1.3 for too low Vout isn't the target range it was initially designed for to be at its best.

Thanks Salas. I remeber with BiB 1.1 I was able to go down to around ~3.8V
 
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
I know the pinouts are different. Other than that, is there any chance to use the Toshiba 2SK117GR in place of the PF5102? I have a couple hundred of the Toshiba's and would like to use them if I can.

Thanks!!

Sims show it should work with the 117s also and without phase margin problems. See to choose them for for 1.5-2mA Id with those 270R or use other value source resistors. The Zo curve may end up more irregular and taking off early but with lower μΩ at its valley region and its initial escalation region. With their smaller Vgs (off) they should be more at ease in the bottom part of Vout's low range too.
 
Thanks, Salas. That is good news.

Let see I read it right. To determine the Toshiba jfet and the source resistor combo, use
1. 9V battery
2. a source resistor, let say a 100R in series with a 500R pot.
3. measure the voltage across the 100R while adjusting the pot, aim at 0.15V - 0.2V.
4. Measure the resistance across the pot and add 100R, that will be source resistor for this jfet.

Does it sound right?

Thanks again!!
 
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
The approach is valid but the resistance values maybe too high for most K117GR samples taking them to Id 1.5-2mA. At roughly an order of magnitude lower the resistors could be more practical for searching out such Id. Simpler would be just using a precise enough DMM in series mA mode between Vcc and drain as well as a 100R trimmer as source resistor.
 
hello,
ultraBiB vs reflektor-D
which one better to powering DAC in both digital and analog section.?

thanks.

It depends on the build. E.g: For reflector-D it is critical to do jfet mod and Led filtering cap must be of high quality. I even use 2xReflectord-D running @ -/+15V for i/v conversion board. I liked it better than BiB 1.1. Can wait to compare it new ultra ones :)
 
It depends on the build. E.g: For reflector-D it is critical to do jfet mod and Led filtering cap must be of high quality. I even use 2xReflectord-D running @ -/+15V for i/v conversion board. I liked it better than BiB 1.1. Can wait to compare it new ultra ones :)

which type of high quality caps do you recommend - for led filtering and after bridge
 
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
The pk-pk voltage range is a matter of an amp's max rails spec. Fortunately the Ubib can go to more than high Vout enough for servicing any hp amp. See post #52 for an example if you also mean pk-pk load current vs current limit setting calculation for an hp amp.
 
Apparently the Ultra V1.3 is Ok for 5-40vdc but there is no mention of negative limitations. I am currently using the Bib V1.1 to power my Hagerman pre-phono which needs 7vdc and -3vdc. Would I still be able to use the V1.3 for the same ? Would it need to be adapted ?
 
Last edited: