Speaker cables don't influence harmonic distortion!

Status
Not open for further replies.
vzaichenko said:
Assuming the amplifier's Zout is low enough, it also improves the speaker's damping and reduces the voltage fluctuations, caused by the speaker's impedance non-linearities (the speaker is driven "harder" with a better cable).
As a result, I expect the total distortion, produced by the speaker with a lower-impedance cable, to be lower than the total distortion, produced by the speaker with a higher-impedance cable.
The distortion in the speaker's acoustic output may be improved or reduced by adding resistance; that depends on exactly what effects are causing the acoustic nonlinearity and how they correlate with impedance nonlinearity. However, you were not measuring acoustic distortion but current distortion. The cable resistance was merely the current sense resistor - this is the point which some people seem unable to grasp, wedded as they are to the tired and unphysical idea that speaker cables are a source of distortion themselves.

xrk971 said:
That’s a single 2cm long part. It doesn’t surprise me that a 2m long multi stranded cable with insulation might have something non-linear going on.
Extrapolating from resistor nonlinearity to cable nonlinearity (on the spurious ground of extra length) is poor engineering, presumably based on poor understanding.

If cables distort then your measuring cables distort too, so you cannot rely on any measurement.

This thread is getting increasingly silly. It appears that many contributors are confused by the physics and maths of a simple potential divider.
 
I was the one who stumbled upon the higher distortion FFTs and alerted Valery to it. I think his data clearly shows that there are effects of the speaker cable on the FFT. It’s not the same as no cable for sure. Whether or not one wants to believe that the cable is the cause of the changes is something that is being argued ad infinitum here.

If you have a sound interface, connect it to your dummy load with and without cable. See what you get. Yes, take all proper precautions to ground properly. You will still see distortion. It’s not the cable that makes the distortion visible - imagine a very short 5cm cable. It won’t be the same as long cable - it will be close to same as no cable. The effect is caused by the cable not that the cable makes it easier to see.

I have seen distortion in an amp change via simple substitution of one brand of thin film resistor vs another (Vishay vs Panasonic) in the feedback or output device source resistor, and I get different harmonic profiles (relative H3 was higher va H2 on one and vice versa). That’s a single 2cm long part. It doesn’t surprise me that a 2m long multi stranded cable with insulation might have something non-linear going on.
I am confident that all here will agree that there is an effect. However, it is not nonlinearities in the cable that are causing the change, it is the cable's impedance which is changing the outcome. With no cables, the amp has the best chance of fighting the non linearities, a resistive cable makes it less possible for the amp to do so. Think of it like a spring...a slinky suspending a golf ball vs a garage door spring. The slinky has less control of where the load goes..yet, both are still linear within the range of operation. (granted, this analogy falls apart terribly fast as springs are typically linear over a range of extensions then become highly non linear prior to plastic deformation).

As to your resistors, it is important to understand the physical processes involved in making the resistors, the materials of the resistor, the material resistance characteristics, as well as the environment the resistor is placed into.

Such things as voltage dependent resistance, how it's trimmed (if any), endcap (termination) materials...so many things..

Sometimes, the simple substitution is not quite as simple as suspected. Trust me, I've banged my head against that wall many a time..😱

Jn
 
Maybe resistor brand change analogy was not good. Regarding resistor endcap termination, maybe that might be similar to how the speaker cables are terminated (opening up yet another can of worms). Soldered, soldered to banana jack, crimped to banana jack, Speakons, bare wire screwed down with binding post clamp, etc. I agree that the effect of a loose spring vs a stiff spring really influences how the load at the end can be driven.
 
Maybe resistor brand change analogy was not good. Regarding resistor endcap termination, maybe that might be similar to how the speaker cables are terminated (opening up yet another can of worms). Soldered, soldered to banana jack, crimped to banana jack, Speakons, bare wire screwed down with binding post clamp, etc. I agree that the effect of a loose spring vs a stiff spring really influences how the load at the end can be driven.

If this is true, the effect is negligible and orders of magnitude lower than the coils (in serie with bass and parallel too), output transistors resistors components in series, as well as the inductors of the transducer which has all 1000x more resistance than the 0.05R 3 meter wire.

A lose connections on the other hand will cause distortion in high frequency. I doubt the makers of electrical components leave microscopic gaps to smear the high frequencies.
 
Probably "minimise" is not a good word in my statement - something like "reduce" would be better. However, my thinking is - a low-impedance cable does not only make the speaker's impedance non-linearity less visible.
Assuming the amplifier's Zout is low enough, it also improves the speaker's damping and reduces the voltage fluctuations, caused by the speaker's impedance non-linearities (the speaker is driven "harder" with a better cable).
As a result, I expect the total distortion, produced by the speaker with a lower-impedance cable, to be lower than the total distortion, produced by the speaker with a higher-impedance cable.

What do you think?

Some measurements with a microphone might be the only way to really see the true end result of cabling changes.
 
Some measurements with a microphone might be the only way to really see the true end result of cabling changes.

Both Wesayso and myself have come across the odd mic measurement of a speaker where a cable caused the phase of the to show some changes. In my case, it was the proximity with another cable - a mains power cord. Made me scratch my head though how it can show up as an acoustic measurement from the speaker.
 
Current in 3m cable with 8R dummy load

OK, here are some more spectrums - measured across the cable wire.
This set if for the dummy load at the end of the shorter cable.
 

Attachments

  • 0030 Hz.PNG
    0030 Hz.PNG
    57.9 KB · Views: 290
  • 20000 Hz.PNG
    20000 Hz.PNG
    45.4 KB · Views: 100
  • 10000 Hz.PNG
    10000 Hz.PNG
    45.7 KB · Views: 89
  • 1000 Hz.PNG
    1000 Hz.PNG
    49.4 KB · Views: 86
  • 0500 Hz.PNG
    0500 Hz.PNG
    58.4 KB · Views: 96
  • 0200 Hz.PNG
    0200 Hz.PNG
    58 KB · Views: 286
  • 0100 Hz.PNG
    0100 Hz.PNG
    58.1 KB · Views: 281
  • 0085 Hz.PNG
    0085 Hz.PNG
    57.6 KB · Views: 287
  • 0050 Hz.PNG
    0050 Hz.PNG
    58.1 KB · Views: 287
Current in 3m cable with the speaker

Now - short cable with the speaker.
 

Attachments

  • 20000 Hz.PNG
    20000 Hz.PNG
    45.5 KB · Views: 91
  • 10000 Hz.PNG
    10000 Hz.PNG
    45.8 KB · Views: 85
  • 1000 Hz.PNG
    1000 Hz.PNG
    45.2 KB · Views: 82
  • 0500 Hz.PNG
    0500 Hz.PNG
    58.6 KB · Views: 78
  • 0200 Hz.PNG
    0200 Hz.PNG
    58.9 KB · Views: 82
  • 0100 Hz.PNG
    0100 Hz.PNG
    58.8 KB · Views: 80
  • 0085 Hz.PNG
    0085 Hz.PNG
    58.1 KB · Views: 88
  • 0050 Hz.PNG
    0050 Hz.PNG
    58.1 KB · Views: 95
  • 0030 Hz.PNG
    0030 Hz.PNG
    58.6 KB · Views: 99
Current in 12m cable with the speaker

Finally - longer cable with the speaker.
 

Attachments

  • 20000 Hz.PNG
    20000 Hz.PNG
    45.6 KB · Views: 79
  • 10000 Hz.PNG
    10000 Hz.PNG
    46.1 KB · Views: 72
  • 1000 Hz.PNG
    1000 Hz.PNG
    49.4 KB · Views: 69
  • 0500 Hz.PNG
    0500 Hz.PNG
    58.4 KB · Views: 78
  • 0200 Hz.PNG
    0200 Hz.PNG
    58.7 KB · Views: 79
  • 0100 Hz.PNG
    0100 Hz.PNG
    59 KB · Views: 75
  • 0085 Hz.PNG
    0085 Hz.PNG
    58.1 KB · Views: 79
  • 0050 Hz.PNG
    0050 Hz.PNG
    58.6 KB · Views: 97
  • 0030 Hz.PNG
    0030 Hz.PNG
    58.6 KB · Views: 91
Parallel wires carrying current attract. This combined with the compliance characteristic of typical insulations would allow mechanical resonance, with mechanical losses of the insulation determining the Q. Has anybody swept speaker cables to determine the nature of this electromechanical resonance?

Dan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.