Unique CFA 120/230W amp

Why do you think bootstrapping will increase OLG?

I am referring to the non active load IP stage. Q25 can bootstrap R5 and Q26 can bootstrap R6. This will create a 'pseudo active' load.

The bootstrap is made by splitting R5 (1k5) into 2 x 750R resistors in series
and drive the junction between them with a cap from the emmitter of Q25.
Same for the lower side.

T
 
I am referring to the non active load IP stage. Q25 can bootstrap R5 and Q26 can bootstrap R6. This will create a 'pseudo active' load.

The bootstrap is made by splitting R5 (1k5) into 2 x 750R resistors in series
and drive the junction between them with a cap from the emmitter of Q25.
Same for the lower side.

T

I tried it and it really decreases distortion below 10kHz but doubles 20kHz distortion, and I don't like big electrolytic caps in that place.
THD below 10kHz is low enough without that bootstrap.
By the way inner FB loop around IPS and VAS is stable, LTspice behaves sometime strange after a few schematic corrections, and I could not get the same plot again.
 
Hi Guys

With just 2p5 as part of the nested loop value, it seems like this would be competing with stray capacitances of the layout? Is this a concern or is the value not too critical?

Have fun

Not to critical. With 5pF THD at 20kHz will increase by 3dB.
Attached LG with 2.5pF and 5pF, 100% increase.
 

Attachments

  • 120W-TT-CFA-triple-TPOIC-efVAS-RC-nonswitch-localNF2-LG-2_5p.jpg
    120W-TT-CFA-triple-TPOIC-efVAS-RC-nonswitch-localNF2-LG-2_5p.jpg
    255.4 KB · Views: 817
  • 120W-TT-CFA-triple-TPOIC-efVAS-RC-nonswitch-localNF2-LG-5p.jpg
    120W-TT-CFA-triple-TPOIC-efVAS-RC-nonswitch-localNF2-LG-5p.jpg
    256.1 KB · Views: 776
As you could see in my previous post I am not using IRFP(9)240 since I do not have sufficiently matched pairs. I use FQA12N(P)20 mosfes instead. I have these matched very well. I intended to use them in PASS F5, bud finaly I decided not to make it. I am finishing my period of A class amps 😀
 

Attachments

  • Damir Side.jpg
    Damir Side.jpg
    664 KB · Views: 932
Here is picture of progress with these boards. I used older boxes from Pass A class monoblocks. At this moment the first one is working properly. It has 42 mV offset at the output and the current through output devices is approximately 70 mA pre device - 140 mA in total.
One monoblock was already tested with speaker, everything was working properly. When I will finish the other one I will post some listening tests.

P.S. Next week I am in Croatia for holiday, so I am sending greetings to Damir. 🙂
 

Attachments

  • CFA120 Top view(1).JPG
    CFA120 Top view(1).JPG
    493.3 KB · Views: 893
Here is picture of progress with these boards. I used older boxes from Pass A class monoblocks. At this moment the first one is working properly. It has 42 mV offset at the output and the current through output devices is approximately 70 mA pre device - 140 mA in total.
One monoblock was already tested with speaker, everything was working properly. When I will finish the other one I will post some listening tests.

P.S. Next week I am in Croatia for holiday, so I am sending greetings to Damir. 🙂

I am glad that it's working even with different mosfet. I hope you have 42 mV of DC offset with no DC servo inserted.
If you pass via Zagreb you can visit me, I will PM you my mobile number if you do.
Damir
PS. You used wrong thread for this one, it should be in 200W CFA, this one is
for bipolar output.
 
Hi Damir,
Thank you for remind, I will post my listening tests in the right thread.😕
The offset is higher due to bigger difference between N and P devices. According to Nelson it is better matched in parasitic capacitances, however it it worse in gate to source voltage. In my case the difference between Vgs is 1,8V i.e. 3,9V vs. 5,7V. Without LF411 the offset is 1,2V.

P.S: Thank you for your kind invitation, unfortunately the bus I am taking will not go through Zagreb :bawling: