Xover to filter woofer SB 23NRSX45-8

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I dont think so. The major issue in your set up is the sba excites first room modes too much, with the typical nasty masking effect called bola de grave (bass ball:mad:).

Imho the Ss is not sensitive enough, but...

It seems that all your assessment is based on 1 speaker at 1 position only. The 1 position only is not really a problem if the smoothing is generous enough, and i think 1/3 octave not generous at all, but...

You need to get the same measuremet for the other speaker, and i am quite sure you will get something different. But...

The real question here is that how each speaker measures separately in the bass (modal area) at the listening position does not really matter. The question is what matters is how your 2 speakers excite room modes in mono mode, that is measuring the response of both speakers at once.

Of course, comb filtering will make this measurement useless above the modal region.
 
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
SEAS attenuation 2R2 + 0.68mH + 9uF at listening position, smoothing now 1/2.
 

Attachments

  • SEAS atenuacion 2R2 0.68mH 9uF.png
    SEAS atenuacion 2R2 0.68mH 9uF.png
    73.1 KB · Views: 68
Btw, i really think that a midwoofer with a sensitivity around 91-92dbs would be perfect.

Another solution might be to bring the midwoofer cabinet closer to the back wall to try get some boundary boosting effect.

I don't think there is anything sacred in the physical algnment between the SBA and the SS at the wavelengths involved.

Same for possible diffraction issue. Properly balancing the energy is the top priority, and maybe the only one...:rolleyes:
 
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
"Another solution might be to bring the midwoofer cabinet closer to the back wall to try get some boundary boosting effect."

Measurement with the mid cabinet near the rear wall green vs aligned in front with the SBA yellow.
 

Attachments

  • SEAS atenuacion 3R3 0.68mH 9uF mid cab new rear wall.png
    SEAS atenuacion 3R3 0.68mH 9uF mid cab new rear wall.png
    38.4 KB · Views: 51
From the beginning i am surprised with this dip in the 100-200 range...:wave2s:

For me it is due to a placement effect , but once again it's the measurement of One speaker ( Left one?) only, at one measuring position so that it is not really that relevant.

What about the other speaker alone, what about both speakers together, etc...
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.