I need to visit the UK some time, lots of interesting things I have learned of over the years. Would be interesting to visit.
I have worked in Texas for some time, when I just arrived, everyone notices I had a New York accent. By the time I left, I noticed that I was catching on the Texas accent.
There are plenty of TH components that are not duplicated or improved by SM.
Just sayin'.
Dan.
I guess I have a mental block rather than lack of understanding. Some things we just need to let others do. [emoji6]
An equally odd thing is happening in the deep South . Most every one is becoming mid- western in their accent. Not a totally bad thing given it is a much more easily understood accent. However the Scotch/ Irish colloquialism and other contraction that where the signature of the place are lost any where near a city. The move to a non native regional accent is viewed as being more sophisticated and urban by the young who most desire to be a uniform individual like the rest ( yes a bit of an oxymoron).
Yes, but that doesn't then infer TH shows a better product. In audio there are some good reasons for SM.
In this case I believe you would use compare 'with' rather than 'to' as both objects are similar, ie: a language.
Correct use of compare to, as the objects are dissimilar.
Incorrect use of the word and when revert is used correctly, revert back is a redundancy.
Isn't this fun? 🙂
hehe
lol
chortle
Not quite invoking Skitt's Law, but surely it is a tautology?
Of course one could claim Hinglish as a dialect...
Great example of refuting a claim that:
(1) Was never made.
(2) I don't know who is stupid enough to ever make.
A great many components can be improved by SM technology by allowing them to be smaller and lower their cost.
Spec RPA-W7EX Real-Sound power amplifier Measurements | Stereophile.com
Another one that makes me chuckle. The designers give the whole dog and pony about component selection and how they have designed out problems with class D, but it can't even do a flat FR to 20kHz and the gain on the balanced input changes by 4.5dB depending upon whether you ground or float pin1.
Once again JA, to his credit says 'this not an amplifier that can be universally recommended, I feel'
Another one that makes me chuckle. The designers give the whole dog and pony about component selection and how they have designed out problems with class D, but it can't even do a flat FR to 20kHz and the gain on the balanced input changes by 4.5dB depending upon whether you ground or float pin1.
Once again JA, to his credit says 'this not an amplifier that can be universally recommended, I feel'
Wow! Chortling, lactation, and the exaltation of snake oil - all in the same thread!
I'm all a-tingle! 🙂
I'm all a-tingle! 🙂
Jacco was having a dig at me. Mind you he has been particularly coherent recently to hate to think what's wrong with him 🙂
Take a TDA1541 DAC. Many claim that the 2x7 rows of 100nF reference decoupling capacitors should be increased.
Something like 1uF X6R 0603 smd capacitors would allow higher value really close to the pins.
Some would name that an antique.
I attended a 3D print convention earlier this week. One of the stands was by a company that restores vintage cars, by printing copies of original parts. A niche market, same as your fossil DAC.
I can think up half a dozen far more important advantages, same for surface mount devices.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.