Nature of design
Cmon, it's nature of design, you get trade-offs... (I'm talking from "numbers" perspective, not subjective sound quality)
First, trade off between HF and LF. Second, when you work with bipolars, verticals or laterals, you'll know that it is difficult to get very good "damping" with laterals. I think the root cause is the relatively low transconductance of the laterals...
And of course it is subjective/relative, meaning that you have to compare with something (bipolar design, or try the SKA amp for vertical), and that the most important component in the chain, the speaker, should not something very easy to drive...
And then, IMO, the "correct" sound of bass is relatively unknown. In the past I really like the general bass sound of mosfet amps, later I found that it was unnatural. Today, with hi-fi we like to compare with real instruments like kick drum for bass. And you know that many bass that we (like to) hear (in the past) was not correlated with any instruments sounds...
Cmon, it's nature of design, you get trade-offs... (I'm talking from "numbers" perspective, not subjective sound quality)
First, trade off between HF and LF. Second, when you work with bipolars, verticals or laterals, you'll know that it is difficult to get very good "damping" with laterals. I think the root cause is the relatively low transconductance of the laterals...
And of course it is subjective/relative, meaning that you have to compare with something (bipolar design, or try the SKA amp for vertical), and that the most important component in the chain, the speaker, should not something very easy to drive...
And then, IMO, the "correct" sound of bass is relatively unknown. In the past I really like the general bass sound of mosfet amps, later I found that it was unnatural. Today, with hi-fi we like to compare with real instruments like kick drum for bass. And you know that many bass that we (like to) hear (in the past) was not correlated with any instruments sounds...
Last edited:
Hmmm, The SKA is the most unnatural sounding of all the amps I have built. Not sure why you choose that one as an example of verticals. Mile's vertical amp designs sound much more natural as do Valery's. YMMV
Hmmm, The SKA is the most unnatural sounding of all the amps I have built.
That's strange 🙂
Not sure why you choose that one as an example of verticals. Mile's vertical amp designs sound much more natural as do Valery's. YMMV
Speaker "damping". Not sure about naturalness.
FX8 Zobel
BTW, Terry and Miles, have you confirmed with measurement that the zobel (I think 4R7 and 100n) is right on?
BTW, Terry and Miles, have you confirmed with measurement that the zobel (I think 4R7 and 100n) is right on?
My FX8, not tested yet.
Yes, you still miss the driver transistors 😉 That's orange cap is a Philips MKT, right? I usually avoid MKT in zobel position. The other white 100n (MMK) looks like a ceramic and they might be better switching the positions?
Yes, you still miss the driver transistors 😉 That's orange cap is a Philips MKT, right? I usually avoid MKT in zobel position. The other white 100n (MMK) looks like a ceramic and they might be better switching the positions?
Yes, i have old stock D669/B469 and i'm going to use them as driver. Any reason for these caps position?
Regards
Yes, i have old stock D669/B469 and i'm going to use them as driver.
Yes I have many of them too from the Crescendo era.
Any reason for these caps position?
May be it doesn't matter. I just use my intuition that MKT is not the right cap for HF stabilization duty. The other one (100n on the CCS) is not critical but here I prefer MKP. This amplifier is not perfect in term of stability (my guess is that the phase margin is no more than 70), so everything must be done precisely: PCB track, zobel values, cap type, etc.
Last edited:
Yes I have many of them too from the Crescendo era.
May be it doesn't matter. I just use my intuition that MKT is not the right cap for HF stabilization duty. The other one (100n on the CCS) is not critical but here I prefer MKP. This amplifier is not perfect in term of stability (my guess is that the phase margin is no more than 70), so everything must be done precisely: PCB track, zobel values, cap type, etc.
Why do you say this? Perhaps you should build and test one before you criticize someone's design and layout.
Why do you say this? Perhaps you should build and test one before you criticize someone's design and layout.
I'm not criticizing. I have built this amp with 3 different output transistors. (It also means 3 different PCBs)
Last edited:
The FX8? Care to post some pictures?
Sorry, I don't have any pictures. Too many projects, don't have motivation to install Samsung Kies or whatever is required to take and post pictures 🙂
Hmmm, The SKA is the most unnatural sounding of all the amps I have built.
I can confirm that. I built an original kit from "ska-audio.com", and the sound is quite boring. I don't know why so many people seem to find that amp "so good". In my ears that amp doesn't do anything right. But I guess it's a matter of taste. 😀
I can confirm that. I built an original kit from "ska-audio.com", and the sound is quite boring.
Yes, verticals/hexfets are not suitable for low current application due to the high input capacitance. Nelson Pass uses them in class-A amplifiers.
For big transistors, when complementary pair is required, I think IRFP240/9240 is about the best. But I don't have this pair and have never used them. I have better big transistors (for big class-A) like this, but N-Channel only (so for single ended/follower).
For complementary pair of hexfet amps, I use smaller mosfet (TO-220AB), which is even better than LATFET. Don't ask me what they are. They are 10A device (bigger than J50 which is 7A), 4x the transconductance of J50, half of J50 input capacitance, I think lower rds-on. SOA is not a problem even in class-A.
In an amplifier, nothing can beat a good transistor.
Sorry, I don't have any pictures. Too many projects, don't have motivation to install Samsung Kies or whatever is required to take and post pictures 🙂
I must say I am not surprised at all with your response. I will no longer give any weight to your claims.
Don't worry Terry,i see many guys here who want only to take and give nothing.🙁I must say I am not surprised at all with your response. I will no longer give any weight to your claims.
In what way does it sound unnatural? Many people like it so what are it's redeeming features?
I second Terry's and Thimios's post. when you build someone's design, you post pics, your impressions, plus your gratitude (becoz you are not so capable[atleast I am not]), .... see my builds... you will see acknowledgement, impressions and thanks to the designer...
reg
Prasi
BTW, Thimios, have you built FX8, nice little amp.. I am awaiting your impressions too😉.
reg
Prasi
BTW, Thimios, have you built FX8, nice little amp.. I am awaiting your impressions too😉.
Last edited:
No prasi, unfortunately not.I second Terry's and Thimios's post. when you build someone's design, you post pics, your impressions, plus your gratitude (becoz you are not so capable[atleast I am not]), .... see my builds... you will see acknowledgement, impressions and thanks to the designer...
reg
Prasi
BTW, Thimios, have you built FX8, nice little amp.. I am awaiting your impressions too😉.
We have many problems in Greece.
Personally I'm jobless for about 3 years now...
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- 100W Ultimate Fidelity Amplifier