I get these from Ebay... seller 'Potatosemi':
http://stores.ebay.com/potatosemi?_trksid=p2047675.l2563
Greg in Mississippi
P.S. I should add that this is the manufacturer, AFAIK.
http://stores.ebay.com/potatosemi?_trksid=p2047675.l2563
Greg in Mississippi
P.S. I should add that this is the manufacturer, AFAIK.
Last edited:
Hi to all.
I search for similar parts for :
1) U3 "2 channel buffer". I found them:
2ch buffer Logic ICs | Mouser
2) U8 "iL 712 2ch dig. isol. soics". I found this Si8401AA-B-IS
Si8401AA-B-IS Silicon Labs | Mouser
3) U9 "NVE715-3E 4ch. dig.isol". I found these Si86445BB-B-IS/Si86445BB-B-IS1
Silicon Laboratories Digital Isolators | Mouser
What are you thinking?
What about these isolators:
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/iso7640fm.pdf
Ohh, I am blind!
Thanks again!
Welcome lemon!
LOL. I had a hard time matching the numbers with the auctions at first too.
Have a great build!
Greg in Mississippi
OTTO-II looks alright for this. Hopefully, this will help you to do some A/B comparisons 🙂I'm looking to do a BBB -> AMN-S02 with AKX302 Clock board -> ADK23P with full sync. Any chance I can use the OTTO-II from TPA and switch between the BBB and Amanero?
There are reports of BBB being better when tested individually with I2S direct but what if when both are going through S03?
Also, In this implementation am I more wise to use 22/24 clocks instead of the 45/49 clocks? It looks from an earlier post from Acko that this was being suggested.
22/24 clock should be fine but the higher 45/49 may bring about better results for ESS DACs (jitter reduction) - haven't tested these for 9023 DACs but see how it goes
Only if you are plugging in Amanero direct using header on this older version. Otherwise just wire following the signal linesI do also have an S03 board that had the mistake with full sync and Amanero pin outs. If I decided to use this board instead how would I be affected?
No problems with these...
I am thinking of using these isolators:
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/iso7640fm.pdf
Will these be suitable?
Can DDDAC 5V supply the current requirements as indicated in the manual?For powering the three different (except for isolator chip input side, this will come from the raspy pi) I am thinking of using one 5v power supply taken from the dddac board. For the clock a local shunt regulator will be used on the S03 board.
Will this be sufficient, or is there a benefit in splitting these?
What will be the total power consumption?
Hi to all.
I search for similar parts for :
1) U3 "2 channel buffer". I found them:
2ch buffer Logic ICs | Mouser Not compatible![]()
2) U8 "iL 712 2ch dig. isol. soics". I found this Si8401AA-B-IS
Si8401AA-B-IS Silicon Labs | Mouser Not recommended for new designs.
3) U9 "NVE715-3E 4ch. dig.isol". I found these Si86445BB-B-IS/Si86445BB-B-IS1
Silicon Laboratories Digital Isolators | Mouser![]()
Also, In this implementation am I more wise to use 22/24 clocks instead of the 45/49 clocks? It looks from an earlier post from Acko that this was being suggested.
acko said:22/24 clock should be fine but the higher 45/49 may bring about better results for ESS DACs (jitter reduction) - haven't tested these for 9023 DACs but see how it goes
I am going to test it with my ES9023 based dac, when I complete it. I have order two Crystek 45/49 for this reason. I can't find (Digikey, Mouser) 45/49 by NDK
Thanks Acko, for the supporting.
Initial results from an early adopter:
Equipment is a commercial DAC with USB-I2S built-in and driving 9018 chip in Sync mode internally. Good sounding setup with performance better than some of the cheap 9018-based DIY DACs out there. DAC has options for external I2S connection via RJ45 interface
1.BBB-I2S connection sounds better than USB
2.Adding S03 module with connection as shown produced even better results
AKLS03 can make the signal smooth as the attached picture so that the sound is improved.

I am going to test it with my ES9023 based dac, when I complete it. I have order two Crystek 45/49 for this reason. I can't find (Digikey, Mouser) 45/49 by NDK
Thanks Acko, for the supporting.
Lemon try thisNDK NZ2520SD 3.3V 80Mhz 49.152Mhz 45.1584Mhz 24.576Mhz 22.5792Mhz 12Mhz Ultra low phase noise oscillator - DIYINHK🙂
Gricko, thanks for the link.
I am thinking, what is the better at these frequencies (45+/49+), the Crystek CCHD-957 or the NDK NZ2520SD.
The price btw them is big 8 vs 25 USD, respectively.
I am thinking, what is the better at these frequencies (45+/49+), the Crystek CCHD-957 or the NDK NZ2520SD.
The price btw them is big 8 vs 25 USD, respectively.
Gricko, thanks for the link.
I am thinking, what is the better at these frequencies (45+/49+), the Crystek CCHD-957 or the NDK NZ2520SD.
The price btw them is big 8 vs 25 USD, respectively.
Depends.For max performance (ES 9018)I have Crysstek,but in setup with PCM 5102,ES 9023 or something similar I will go with NDK.Balance,compromise...and have fun!
No problems with these
Can DDDAC 5V supply the current requirements as indicated in the manual?
Hi,
In the docs there is mention of 50m and 100m for the current usage.
Am I right in the assumption this means clock freq?
In that case I will need 140mA for 100 mhz clock. I use my own unregulated power supply on the dddac and the local 5v regulator can handle this so this will be no problem.
Regards,
Its nice to see a progress with BBB solution here.
Can someone try to play audiofile with 352.8kHz or 385kHz sampling rate from BBB with MCLK fed from external clock? Does it work?
Thanks for the info.
Can someone try to play audiofile with 352.8kHz or 385kHz sampling rate from BBB with MCLK fed from external clock? Does it work?
Thanks for the info.
Its nice to see a progress with BBB solution here.
Can someone try to play audiofile with 352.8kHz or 385kHz sampling rate from BBB with MCLK fed from external clock? Does it work?
Thanks for the info.
Suitable DxD files can be downloaded here:
High Resolution Music DOWNLOAD services .:. FLAC in free TEST BENCH
Its nice to see a progress with BBB solution here.
Can someone try to play audiofile with 352.8kHz or 385kHz sampling rate from BBB with MCLK fed from external clock? Does it work?
Thanks for the info.
You cann't directly play audiofile with 352.8kHz or 385kHz sampling rate from BBB.
You can directly play audiofile with 96kHz sampling rate from BBB based on good quality power supply.
It's some distortion when I play audiofile with 192kHz sampling rate from BBB based on good quality power supply.
You have to use one of Isolator/Reclocker.
I'm sure that the AKL-S03 can play audiofile with 352.8kHz or 385kHz sampling rate from BBB.
Last edited:
Hi Acko,
I have some philips 74hc74d in my parts bin. Are these suitable instead of po74g74a?
Philips - datasheet pdf
I have noticed that there is a 3pin through hole arrangement next to c4, this is new on the black board. Is this a spot for a shunt regulator for the supply of the clock? It's not clear in the documentation.
Regards,
I have some philips 74hc74d in my parts bin. Are these suitable instead of po74g74a?
Philips - datasheet pdf
I have noticed that there is a 3pin through hole arrangement next to c4, this is new on the black board. Is this a spot for a shunt regulator for the supply of the clock? It's not clear in the documentation.
Regards,
Attachments
Last edited:
Hi Acko,
I have some philips 74hc74d in my parts bin. Are these suitable instead of po74g74a?
Philips - datasheet pdf
Nope, pin compatible but 23MHz max clock!
You have a 100MHz clock so po74g74a only
Yes, indicated as RG1 on the schematic but not marked on the boardI have noticed that there is a 3pin through hole arrangement next to c4, this is new on the black board. Is this a spot for a shunt regulator for the supply of the clock? It's not clear in the documentation.
- Home
- Group Buys
- Amanero Isolator/Reclocker GB