Should have same impedance as positive inputs, so closer to 6.8uF if you use classII ceramics I would think.
If they're just ground referenced, then what's the issue? There's nothing going in or out of the neutral pins, so how does the impedance matter? No difference in sound either. Lower ESR on ceramics too.
Should have same impedance as positive inputs, so closer to 6.8uF if you use classII ceramics I would think.
I agree. A fully differential input as the TPA3132 has should have the same electrical characteristics on both inputs. Regardless if one is effectively tied to ground.
Also, you mentioned how this design "ticks off all the boxes plus some". May I ask, what are the "boxes"? Is this by comparison to an amp32 replacement? I thought it would be useful to know for when for when I make future improvements.
Mostly it's a comparison as an amp32 replacement. There are to my knowledge no other commercially available designs with as high output in the same physical size. The closest is the maxamp20 which is more than twice as big or the rather feeble Dayton DTA2 (aka the original t-amp) .
edit: your probably right, impedance ceramic will be lower than combined positive input impedance. I would replace the electrolytics on input if you want to improve, and maybe put the small DC decoupling ceramics closer to chip than the bigger value?
I considered film input coupling caps, but they would be massive. Some high voltage ceramics might be a good substitute, I'll have a play.
Also you're probably right, I'll switch the 0603 and 1210 caps around. The caps are 1nF 0603, 100nF 50V 0603 and 100nF 200V 1210. I included the 1210 for the lower ESR.
Bias is on negative input as on positive, they are not neutral or gnd
Yes all the inputs are biased at 3VDC. I was simply naming them as per the pinout on the chip.
I use 10uF/16V ceramics for input caps...on both input lines.
Look at page 4 of data sheet...inputs are part of the feedback path of the first gain stage.
Using a smaller cap value on the not-used-input will affect low frequency roll-off.
🙂
Look at page 4 of data sheet...inputs are part of the feedback path of the first gain stage.
Using a smaller cap value on the not-used-input will affect low frequency roll-off.
🙂
Thanks for the input guys. I'll take your word for it, so I'll leave the amps with the original caps.
I'd have no qualms about getting rid of the electrolytic coupling caps, and following Doug's suggestion I'll replace them with 10uF X7R types.
I'd have no qualms about getting rid of the electrolytic coupling caps, and following Doug's suggestion I'll replace them with 10uF X7R types.
I use 10uF/16V ceramics for input caps...on both input lines.
Look at page 4 of data sheet...inputs are part of the feedback path of the first gain stage.
Using a smaller cap value on the not-used-input will affect low frequency roll-off.
🙂
Now say source has 2uF on output going to 10uF in series on positive input 3132/3116, effectively almost 2uF. Negative 10uF to ground, that is a big difference between positive and negative??
I'm busy with some other stuff right now so I can't do anything in depth, although there is no audible difference whatsoever between the different caps.
OK, so I've been playing with the PCB editor for a bit today... My wrist hurts now.
Ditching the terminals in favor of 100th pin headers means the current ferrite bead design can reduce to 1 inch square. For the same size as it is currently, I have redesigned the board with LC output filters.
Would it be worth building both? I can't really imagine who would need a square inch amp so I may switch entirely to inductors.
Ditching the terminals in favor of 100th pin headers means the current ferrite bead design can reduce to 1 inch square. For the same size as it is currently, I have redesigned the board with LC output filters.
Would it be worth building both? I can't really imagine who would need a square inch amp so I may switch entirely to inductors.
OK, so I've been playing with the PCB editor for a bit today... My wrist hurts now.
Ditching the terminals in favor of 100th pin headers means the current ferrite bead design can reduce to 1 inch square. For the same size as it is currently, I have redesigned the board with LC output filters.
Would it be worth building both? I can't really imagine who would need a square inch amp so I may switch entirely to inductors.
Mine is not as small.
Inductors used.
3116 and bootstrap caps on bottom of board.
🙂
Attachments
That looks pretty slick Doug. Out of interest, what made you decide to use Tantalums? I'm aware of the electrical and size benefits, but given how many have blown up on me for no reason I find it hard to trust the darn things.
That looks pretty slick Doug. Out of interest, what made you decide to use Tantalums? I'm aware of the electrical and size benefits, but given how many have blown up on me for no reason I find it hard to trust the darn things.
I have also had a bad experience once...one blew up and left a mark on my shoulder. 🙂
In this case they are 25V and I only use 12V on this amp.
The case is the heat sink so I did not want to run 19V as I usually do.
🙂
Ah right, plenty of leeway then. Still that design looks very low profile, nice job.
Anyway, got a couple Coilcraft inductors to play with. I really want to minimise SMD parts on the back side of the board, so I'll be using the through hole ones. This also means I don't have to worry about getting the power traces to the other side of the board as the pins are going right through, plus it makes it easier to hand assemble. And not to mention the huge mechanical benefits of through hole inductors. I'm a huge fan of SMD but especially in something such a portable speaker set, having large bulky SMD parts doesn't make a lot of sense if it can be avoided.
Anyway, got a couple Coilcraft inductors to play with. I really want to minimise SMD parts on the back side of the board, so I'll be using the through hole ones. This also means I don't have to worry about getting the power traces to the other side of the board as the pins are going right through, plus it makes it easier to hand assemble. And not to mention the huge mechanical benefits of through hole inductors. I'm a huge fan of SMD but especially in something such a portable speaker set, having large bulky SMD parts doesn't make a lot of sense if it can be avoided.
Attachments
Though if I ever need greater current capacity on vias, I just bundle a load together (plenty of that on these boards).
How do you prevent ESL rising exponentially with multiple vias grouped together?
How do you prevent ESL rising exponentially with multiple vias grouped together?
I've never considered that to be a huge issue on a sufficiently decoupled power bus. I never go between layers on things like the output of a switcher (and so on... Not that anyone does) and nothing on this circuit is high speed so it's not much of a problem.
Well I just bought one of these TPA3116 Class D Digital Power Amplifier Board Inductor Circuit Design 50W+50W | eBay
I know it's probably not the best TPA3116 board available but it was so darn cheap I thought it might be good to have something to compare my boards to.
When it arrives (probably next week) I'll get some proper listening comparisons done.
I know it's probably not the best TPA3116 board available but it was so darn cheap I thought it might be good to have something to compare my boards to.
When it arrives (probably next week) I'll get some proper listening comparisons done.
I know it's probably not the best TPA3116 board available but it was so darn cheap I thought it might be good to have something to compare my boards to.
When it arrives (probably next week) I'll get some proper listening comparisons done.
That's a Danzz design board, recommended for modding. Don't know how it sounds unmodded, haven't tried it.
The best one I have (unmodded) is Breeze Audio HIFI TPA3116. It sounds so good that I didn't have any real incentive for modding, and I'm using it as is (I just rewired the mute switch to act as power switch).
That's a Danzz design board, recommended for modding. Don't know how it sounds unmodded, haven't tried it.
The best one I have (unmodded) is Breeze Audio HIFI TPA3116. It sounds so good that I didn't have any real incentive for modding, and I'm using it as is (I just rewired the mute switch to act as power switch).
It's quite amazing how cheap that Breeze one is, the whole thing, in a fancy box for that price really is astonishing.
As said in the edit on the first post, all amps are now gone. I'm going to have the next version with full LC output filters and some other minor changes ready in 2-3 weeks. Price will be £22 each. If you're interested, let me know any time and I'll reserve one for you. Thanks for all the interest guys!
Also thanks to DUG, Saturnus and Irribeo on suggestions for the amp.
Also thanks to DUG, Saturnus and Irribeo on suggestions for the amp.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Class D
- Really really small TPA3132 amp