On a serious note, use SMD devices where possible, preferably for all components, this will have the advantage of minimising assembly costs (a big factor if PTH components are used) and minimising the loop area of any signals especially feedback loop minimising interference and parasitic affects of routes etc.
I'd even do you the layout to your requirements for free if you go that path, I think it would be interesting.
I'd even do you the layout to your requirements for free if you go that path, I think it would be interesting.
See product datasheet, physical dimension picture.So what's L then? That was the question; assuming you mean with 'l' the lead length?.
I have had to put a house brick on top of a cd player on top of a decent stand to allow it to track properly and not modulate the audio output (less servo induced audio/dsp PSU modulation).How much vibration will audio in a domestic situation encounter, and what worries me working in areas where vibration testing etc. is the norm why isn't it done if it is suspected it will affect the product, it should be tested on a vibration table. I suspect that unless it is a totally naff design the levels are not that high in a domestic environment.
Automotive valve springs underneath cdp's and amplifiers works quite well.
This requires quite high total mass to 'float' the particular item.
Two slabs of stone kitchen top works great...springs/stone sheet/amp or cdp/stone sheet.
Run a system loud, and put your fingers on stands and system component surfaces.....the vibrations can be quite powerful, and with high Q.
IME, taming vibration behaviour helps sonically big time when running at high SPL especially.
Dan.
Last edited:
See product datasheet, physical dimension picture.
Yes that's the mechanical outside dimension.
For the inductance they mention 'total length of capacitor windings' (bold mine).
Are you thinking that is the same as 'L'?
jan
CD servos can be quite sensitive, moving parts, as to the rest how much of a problem is it, is there empirical data regarding this, I would hope there is within the audio community as it does come up regularly and there are many anti vibration products for audio, and many anti vibration products out there for electronics. This is another area where there is a lot of engineering info and solutions that are more elegant than valve springs, AV mounts have to be matched to the vibration encountered and the weight of the product amongst other things. Again SMD devices are much less prone to the effect of vibration than are leaded devices.
I do know in certain fields of audio (communication) the effects of vibration on components and assemblies is very well studied, a lot will be proprietary and covered by NDAs etc. but there is a lot of info out there, so solutions can be engineered.
I do know in certain fields of audio (communication) the effects of vibration on components and assemblies is very well studied, a lot will be proprietary and covered by NDAs etc. but there is a lot of info out there, so solutions can be engineered.
total lenght of capacitor winding is width of metalized foil used in capacitor (about the same as "L", leads are welded to contact metal layers at sides (dimension of this area is about B*H) of this foil . L is not lenght of capacitor "winding".For the inductance they mention 'total length of capacitor windings' (bold mine).
Are you thinking that is the same as 'L'?
Disagree, only by engineering will you get there, not magic.
This statement is true only conditionally, since engineers do not have proper goal for their efforts, standard measurements do not serve. First, engineers should get proper targets at audio design, and this seems to be incomparably more difficult than continuing the convenient game with THD and spectra.
The problem is that CDP focus/tracking coil servo driver stages pull big currents when encountering scratched/damaged/fingerprinted discs, and strong vibrations of the player mechanism (acoustic feedback).CD servos can be quite sensitive, moving parts, as to the rest how much of a problem is it, is there empirical data regarding this, I would hope there is within the audio community as it does come up regularly and there are many anti vibration products for audio, and many anti vibration products out there for electronics. This is another area where there is a lot of engineering info and solutions that are more elegant than valve springs, AV mounts have to be matched to the vibration encountered and the weight of the product amongst other things. Again SMD devices are much less prone to the effect of vibration than are leaded devices.
I do know in certain fields of audio (communication) the effects of vibration on components and assemblies is very well studied, a lot will be proprietary and covered by NDAs etc. but there is a lot of info out there, so solutions can be engineered.
With typical consumer players this (erratic) PSU load modulation affects the DSP and DA stages through power supply/earth interactions.
Acoustic feedback can turn a pretty good sounding CDP into a sorry mess.
One day I will try to measure it.
The valve springs/kitchen stone suggestion is one born of zero cost....recycled objects.
Yes, the mass/spring ratio needs to be tuned, and damping of the springs themselves also.
The heavier and 'dumber' the whole system component support system and individual system components, so much the better.
Dan.
Last edited:
This statement is true only conditionally, since engineers do not have proper goal for their efforts, standard measurements do not serve. First, engineers should get proper targets at audio design, and this seems to be incomparably more difficult than continuing the convenient game with THD and spectra.
LOL
total length of capacitor winding and the leads= L+2l
Wrong, length of the capacitor winding is the length of the capacitor, not the capacitor case.
Length of the capacitor is the lead spacing.
The inductance for your example would become : 0.8 * (p + 2l) nH.
(really old news btw, it's how every cap manufacturer defines it)
Last edited:
Good that only this, not ROFL. The last is closer to young engineers.
Last edited:
Wrong, length of the capacitor winding is the length of the capacitor, not the capacitor case.
Length of the capacitor is the lead spacing.
The inductance for your example would become : 0.8 * (p + 2l) nH.
(really old news btw, it's how every cap manufacturer defines it)
Siemens: "The self-inductance is influenced by the contact paths to the electrodes and the structure of the windings. As far as possible, all capacitors
described in this data book are constructed with low-inductance bifilar electrode current paths or extended-foil contacts. A general rule for deducing the self-inductance states that the maximum value is 1 nH per mm lead length and capacitor length."
Literature: EPCOS AG, Film Capacitors
Definitely not length of the winding.
L is not lenght of capacitor "winding".
I am now thinking that in the data sheet they seem to refer to rolled capacitors, while it in effect is about stacked capacitors. The term 'total length of winding' does make sense for rolled caps but not for stacked caps.
Ohh well. Maybe I should just measure it 🙂
Jan
Last edited:
Definitely not length of the winding.
www.wima.com/EN/selfinductance.htm
(PCM is a Wima term, afaik, printed circuit module)
Last edited:
We know what it means, and we have to know capacitor winding construction (bifilar, stacked foil etc.). Please check manufacturer's literature.
First off who was watching wrestling when you could have been watching the Thunderbirds and real roller derby?
John,
You want to test for micro-phonic problems with your electronics just bill a box large enough to put your finished design inside and mount a full range bookshelf speaker driving the inside of the box. You'll get all the acoustic energy you could ever want.
For those who have never put on a demonstration at something like the CES or even the old Stereophile shows it is easy to say it is easy to do. First off unless you have big bucks and have choice of rooms and also have access to those rooms long before a show how would you know how the room is going to sound? The power at the CES show in Vegas was something else, I think one years we were working off generators and another off of whatever you could get out of the wall. Not a simple thing to presuppose you have under control. And I can tell you right now my neighbors hated me, the had to deal with real low frequency bleed into their rooms both next to me and below me. What was I supposed to do for them, use a low frequency filter and cut the bass out of my speakers to make my neighbor happy? We had multiple sound absorbing panels in the room but that would never handle the real low frequency content, sorry to everyone else they were out of luck.
And Frank,
If you want to talk about your improvements beyond the wordsmithing you are doing then come out with it and give some real world examples of what you do to improve your sound. Like I changed this wire, or removed this switch or something we can get our minds around instead of I tweak something and it sounds better. Give some real clear examples and perhaps we won't fry you as often and see if we can make sense of what you are always alluding to. And until you can reference something other than a cheap PC speaker you are really preaching in the wrong place, you do need to go over to something like the LinkedIn audiophile group where you will have plenty of people on your side.
Err, its not easy , nor is it difficult, it takes planning , when done good sound is or good enuff to show the product is achievable , bad sound or the excuse of poor show conditions is but a crutch...
Term 'winding length' is ridiculous, without definition of capacitor construction. A cap with 10m of foil would have automatically 10uH of self-capacitance? You must be joking.
Afaig, the initial question referred to a Rifa PHE 426.
(as a chronic joker, I just saw capacitors in half to see what they look like on the inside)
(as a chronic joker, I just saw capacitors in half to see what they look like on the inside)
The problem is that CDP focus/tracking coil servo driver stages pull big currents when encountering scratched/damaged/fingerprinted discs, and strong vibrations of the player mechanism (acoustic feedback).
With typical consumer players this (erratic) PSU load modulation affects the DSP and DA stages through power supply/earth interactions.
Acoustic feedback can turn a pretty good sounding CDP into a sorry mess.
One day I will try to measure it.
The valve springs/kitchen stone suggestion is one born of zero cost....recycled objects.
Yes, the mass/spring ratio needs to be tuned, and damping of the springs themselves also.
The heavier and 'dumber' the whole system component support system and individual system components, so much the better.
Dan.
I have moved all my CD's to hard drive, gets rid of a lot of these problems. I would hope that the CD manufacturer would address most of these problems, though having looked inside some CD players (mid range) I was quite shocked at how cheap the construction and PCBs were.
I would though be interested in any research that has been done regarding vibration levels in equipment in domestic situations, as such things as record decks and valves I would have thought are susceptible to vibration?
I would though be interested in any research that has been done regarding vibration levels in equipment in domestic situations, as such things as record decks and valves I would have thought are susceptible to vibration?
I afraid, again, sound effects from vibrations are still listenable even if proper sensor can not measure any vibration amplitude.
Saying not for joke, Yuri Makarov was playing with Mark Levinson CD transport and DAC, and reported listenable improvements up to 160kg of total load over CD cabinets.
Of course, he also did his best in inter-cabinets anti-vibration measures.
Lifting up and putting down 30kg weight over CD transport is his routine everyday exercises during listening. At the same time, no any computer-based source can approach CD sound quality, he tested dozens of them.
Attachments
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II