TABAQ TL for Tang Band - Page 29 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th March 2012, 01:56 PM   #281
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Copenhagen
The TABAQ BOX is 14.4 x 25 x 44,1 cm.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf TABAQ BOX Cabinet.pdf (124.1 KB, 800 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th March 2012, 02:56 PM   #282
zman01 is offline zman01  Bangladesh
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dhaka
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjohannesen View Post
The TABAQ BOX is 14.4 x 25 x 44,1 cm.
Thanks Bjorn. A bit taller than what I was looking for, but let's see!

-Zia
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2012, 10:36 PM   #283
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cluj-Napoca
Are there any TangBand 3" drivers that are not suited for the TABAQ and should be avoided?
Which of the 3" drivers would be the most bass strong among the TangBands? (not including the extra super expensive w3 1878) would the Vifa TG9FD 10 04 be stronger because it's slightly bigger?
What about Xmax, some of the models used in TABAQ had only 0.5 mm, awfully small, isn't that a problem?
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2012, 09:19 PM   #284
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Copenhagen
Hi Krakatoa,

TABAQ was desinged for the TB 3" 315SC which has a high Ots of 0.64. This makes it possible to get much lower bass than expected for the drivers relatively high Fs. You can use any TB 3" - or other 3" drivers - as long as the Qts is not much lower than the 0.64.

For drivers with a lower Fs than 100 Hz, the Qts can be lower. This is the reason TABAQ works very well with the 4" TB drivers.

I must admit I have also considered the Vifa TG9FD, I have enclosed a simulation of this driver which you might find useful

Hi from Bjorn
Attached Files
File Type: pdf VIFA 3.5 Full Range.pdf (99.4 KB, 239 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2012, 07:27 PM   #285
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cluj-Napoca
Is there any special reason for which the 315SC was chosen over other TangBand 3" drivers? perhaps something related to overall sound (tonal balance, smooth frequency graph etc).
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2012, 07:56 PM   #286
Solve is offline Solve  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Solve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
No, choose whatever you can afford.
Dont bother with that sort of questions.
__________________
Music is the only art in real time....
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2012, 08:03 PM   #287
Squeak is offline Squeak  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Squeak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Frederiksberg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solve View Post
No, choose whatever you can afford.
Dont bother with that sort of questions.
What a strange reply.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2012, 08:18 PM   #288
Solve is offline Solve  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Solve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Maybe, you help me out.
__________________
Music is the only art in real time....
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2012, 09:18 PM   #289
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Copenhagen
315SC has an Fs of 100Hz compared to other TB 3 inch drivers which had Fs of 110 Hz. And the Danish reseller recomended the driver - and had it on stock.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2012, 11:14 AM   #290
danzz is online now danzz  Spain
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Hi Bjohansen:

Im thinking to build some satellites for my HT with your Tabaq design with the Tang Band W3 881SI, the Qts that shows the spec sheet from I got from Tang band its says a Qts of 0.59. the Fs is 100Hz... Would you recommend the Tabaq TL for this drivers!?.

Thanks!!!

PD: I think this will help a lot of people that bought this drivers from the PE buyout, and still doubting like me wich design to use.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tang Band W3-593SF vs. Tang Band W3-926SD Zaputh Full Range 17 5th June 2009 11:37 PM
Tang Band MTM ? wrenchone Multi-Way 11 21st November 2007 06:39 PM
8 x 12 Tang Band troystg Subwoofers 3 2nd February 2007 03:37 AM
Tang-band 2-way (W3+W8) haffe Multi-Way 10 31st January 2007 11:11 PM
New Tang Band is BUSTED! Zero Cool Subwoofers 6 8th May 2006 04:15 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:39 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2