• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Tubelab SPP first timer build

Just to write some boring information for the readers.
The famous R1, which was replaced in my case using a choke.
As we know, i had a high B+, so a resisitor/s was fitted from the centre tap of the secondary to ground.

I was 'playing' with values to get just over 320v.
I am happy to say that my resistors are now 150 ohm + 330 ohm = 103 ohm, giving me a B+ of 322v.

As for the voltage across R1 (103 ohms) we have 22.16 v.a.c.
Yes Francois, you were so close with your recommended 100 ohms.
So i think it's 22.16v X 22.16v ÷ 103R = 4.78 watts
Out of curiosity, how do i work out the wattage per resistor?


Based on the B+ 322v i measured these voltages: -
V102 Cathode = 11.07v - therefore = 0.034 A (11.07v÷ 322v = A)
V101 Cathode = 10.86v - " " = 0.034 A
V202 Cathode = 10.83v - " " = 0.034 A
V201 Cathode = 11.17v - " " = 0.035 A

Also measured (for power dissipation): -
R117 / V102 pin 9 = 319.5v (319.5v - 11.07v = 308.43) X 0.034 = 10.48 W
R113 / V101 pin 9 = 319.7v (319.7v - 10.86v = 308.84) X 0.034 = 10.50 W
R217 / V202 pin 9 = 319.5v (319.5v - 10.83v = 308.67) X 0.034 = 10.50 W
R213 / V201 pin 9 = 319.3v (319.3V - 11.17v = 308.13) X 0.035 = 10.79 W
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Yes Francois, you were so close with your recommended 100 ohms.
So i think it's 22.16v X 22.16v ÷ 103R = 4.78 watts
Out of curiosity, how do i work out the wattage per resistor?

:cool: Lucky guess.:)

Since both resistors have the same 22.16 V across them you can simply use the same formula with the individual resistor values as divisor. I.e. 22.16 x 22.16 ÷ 150R = 3.274 Watts.

When you are ready please l us know how it sounds, and perhaps a picture or two of what your final product looks like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Hello calpe,
Based on the B+ 322v i measured these voltages: -
V102 Cathode = 11.07v - therefore = 0.034 A (11.07v÷ 322v = A)
V101 Cathode = 10.86v - " " = 0.034 A
V202 Cathode = 10.83v - " " = 0.034 A
V201 Cathode = 11.17v - " " = 0.035 A
Unfortunately, an incorrect value was used in the calculation. For the total dissipation, the value of the resistance of R112/R116 (300 ohms) must be used.

... for the current flow (Ohm's law)
V102 => 11.07 V / 300 Ω = 0.0369 A
V101 => 10.86 V / 300 Ω = 0.0362 A
V202 => 10.83 V / 300 Ω = 0.0361 A
V201 => 11.17 V / 300 Ω = 0.0372 A

... and for power dissipation
V102 => (322 - 11.07) * 0.0369 = 11.47 W
V101 => (322 - 10.86) * 0.0362 = 11.26 W
V202 => (322 - 10.83) * 0.0361 = 11.23 W
V201 => (322 - 11.17) * 0.0372 = 11.56 W

Also measured (for power dissipation): -
R117 / V102 pin 9 = 319.5v (319.5v - 11.07v = 308.43) X 0.034 = 10.48 W
R113 / V101 pin 9 = 319.7v (319.7v - 10.86v = 308.84) X 0.034 = 10.50 W
R217 / V202 pin 9 = 319.5v (319.5v - 10.83v = 308.67) X 0.034 = 10.50 W
R213 / V201 pin 9 = 319.3v (319.3V - 11.17v = 308.13) X 0.035 = 10.79 W
For the calculation of the dissipation of g2 (max. 2.2W) the value at pin 9 is necessary, but also the current flow at this point.
The current flow can be determined by measuring the voltage across the relevant resistor R113/R117 (100 ohms).
In each case the measuring probe at the ends of the resistor.

Best regards ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Since both resistors have the same 22.16 V across them you can simply use the same formula with the individual resistor values as divisor. I.e. 22.16 x 22.16 ÷ 150R = 3.274 Watts.
When you are ready please l us know how it sounds, and perhaps a picture or two of what your final product looks like.
150 & 330 ohm 10W Resistors, I had to order via my nearest component shop in Algeciras (Spain), 20 min drive. Should be here by Saturday.
Once fitted etc., I'll happily post finished pictures
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Hello calpe,
For the calculation of the dissipation of g2 (max. 2.2W) the value at pin 9 is necessary, but also the current flow at this point.
The current flow can be determined by measuring the voltage across the relevant resistor R113/R117 (100 ohms).
In each case the measuring probe at the ends of the resistor.

Best regards ;)
Trust me to balls up the calculations, thanks for the corrections.
I will check the other voltages across R113, 117, 213 and R217 as soon as i can.
 
From post #566 would i be correct in saying: -
P = V x I (voltage dropped across screen X Screen current)

V102
0.49v (across R117) ÷ 100 (R117) = 0.0049A (4.9mA)
319 (+V on pin 9 V102) X 0.0049 = 1.56 watts

V101
0.48v ÷ 100R = 0.0048A
319v X 0.0048A = 1.53 watts

V202
0.49v ÷ 100R = 0.0049A
319v X 0.0049A = 1.56 watts

V201
0.48v ÷ 100R = 0.0048A
319v X 0.0048A = 1.53 watts

How does this appear?
 
Member
Joined 2021
Paid Member
Close, but you need to subtract the cathode voltage from the screen grid voltage before multiplying by the current, for example:
V102
0.49v (across R117) ÷ 100 (R117) = 0.0049A (4.9mA)
319-11.07(+V on pin 9 V102 - V102 Cathode voltage) X 0.0049 ~ 1.51 watts
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Close, but you need to subtract the cathode voltage from the screen grid voltage before multiplying by the current, for example:
V102
0.49v (across R117) ÷ 100 (R117) = 0.0049A (4.9mA)
319-11.07(+V on pin 9 V102 - V102 Cathode voltage) X 0.0049 ~ 1.51 watts
Thank you kindly for the corrections. Trust me!

What does the 1.51 watts indicate?
I've looked at the technical sheet of the Sovtek EL84, didn't see anything.
 
Last edited:
I've looked at the technical sheet of the Sovtek EL84, didn't see anything.

Datasheet here (P = power, a = anode, g2 = grid2)

1687291414386.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Images of my nearly complete build.
Just a few labels and tidying up of the inside cabling.

Otherwise, the sound is superb.

Many thanks to you all, for your patience and assistance.
 

Attachments

  • 20230703_100932.jpg
    20230703_100932.jpg
    217.4 KB · Views: 85
  • 20230703_100804.jpg
    20230703_100804.jpg
    200.7 KB · Views: 89
  • 20230703_100830.jpg
    20230703_100830.jpg
    218.6 KB · Views: 91
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users