The data shown tell you what the network is doing- that IS the point of network analysis. Changing the load will give you predictable results, which I'm sure you can calculate.
This seems to have just as much effect as the speaker cables they used to sell which had a potted network consisting of nothing on one end and a 150R on the other.
Generally the way this works is reasons and evidence are provided to support assertions.
The reason is that in order to achieve the best common mode rejection (which is the whole raison d'être of balanced interfaces), the noise needs to be common mode to begin with. An imbalance of impedances results in some noise being converted to normal mode rather than staying common mode. I hope that here of all places I don't have to provide evidence of how a differential input works.
se
So he does a different filter for every speaker out there? (and by implication every headphone out there?
Looking at the $10k of pure marketing here SL-Matrix 90 Speaker Interface | Speaker Interfaces | Available in Stores | MIT Cables there is no mentino of it being adapted for anything in particular, other than people with deep pockets.
I posted the values. 50R source, 300R load. You can derive anything you need from the network transfer curve I have shown.
You might want to read the relevant patent app instead of the old one about speaker cables- which this isn't.
That's what was being claimed in the Vero marketing. Going to see if we can hold of a Sennheiser HD-800 version and compare the component values to those on the board that's in the cable that was sent to SY, which was an Audeze LCD cable.
se
The cable that was sent to SY was made for Audeze LCD headphones, which are planarmagnetics and have a flat, resistive impedance curve, and by definition, a flat group delay.
You're just going to have to resign yourself to the fact that Brisson is and always has been nothing but a quack and a charlatan.
se
Ah. Haven't got drunk enough to actually read the Vero marketing
It's almost as funny as the joke in the Monty Python skit.
se
Those claims call out a -45 degree phase shift within the audio band. This is entirely absent in measurements of the device.
HAHAHAHA!
Oh man! This is some industrial strength irony!
Bruce flubbed up on those "balanced" cables because he wasn't aware that in the headphone arena, "balanced" is the term they use for bridged amplifiers.
I was looking through his patents to see what other of his patents could possibly be construed to applying to the Vero.
Well in 1999, he managed to secure a patent for bridging a pair of amplifiers (something people were doing long before his 1997 filing date) and in his patent, he refers to it as "balanced."
HAHAHAHAHA!
What a maroon.
Check patent number 5,914,636.
se
Oh man! This is some industrial strength irony!
Bruce flubbed up on those "balanced" cables because he wasn't aware that in the headphone arena, "balanced" is the term they use for bridged amplifiers.
I was looking through his patents to see what other of his patents could possibly be construed to applying to the Vero.
Well in 1999, he managed to secure a patent for bridging a pair of amplifiers (something people were doing long before his 1997 filing date) and in his patent, he refers to it as "balanced."
HAHAHAHAHA!
What a maroon.
Check patent number 5,914,636.
se
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.