Chassis for a group order of non-inverted GC kit?

[Colin]

Is it possible to supply integrated front panel (with hols for pots) with no printing?

Colin

 

[Cappy]

I vote for the "Specialized" without the "Kits".

To be honest, "Kits" sounds a little down market to me for something on display in a living room.

 

[indoubt]

Prefer, Volume indication and selection indication but no logo

 

[Peter Daniel]

Is it possible to supply integrated front panel (with hols for pots) with no printing?

No problem with that

To be honest, "Kits" sounds a little down market to me for something on display in a living room.

My feeling exactly.

I will see what can be done. If it's no problem for them to omit the logo while silkscreening, then I'll go for that option. Otherwise, one can always remove it himself, it shouldn't be a big problem. Just post your preferrence, so I know how many changes apply.

 

[tg3]

Source and Volume look good.

The logo, as is, looks like a giant billboard. It breaks up the smooth, minimalist flow of the front.

I vote either the logo is moved to right lower corner (and made smaller), or omitted.

If you keep the logo in the center, then omit 'kits' and make it smaller.

My .017 EU.

 

[mitch808]

I say if it doesn't cost anything to put them on as in the cost is already bundled into the chassis price, just go ahead and put it on. It is very simple to remove from an end user standpoint.

But the word "kit" I don't care for. A small lower left or right hand corner logo would suffice.

 

[Jamh]

Peter, for those of us who specified "no silk screening", there will be none, right?

 

[Peter Daniel]

No silkscreening is no problem, just let me know.

Here's the revised version of front panel. I kinda like it now

 

[Peter Daniel]

And with better resolution

 

[cowanrg]

peter, almost everyone that has voiced an opinion has said they would like to see no logo and also an indication for volume (ticks or something). you said you would go with the majority, and the overwhelming majority has said they dont like the logo on there.

 

[Peter Daniel]

peter, almost everyone that has voiced an opinion has said they would like to see no logo and also an indication for volume (ticks or something). you said you would go with the majority, and the overwhelming majority has said they dont like the logo on there.

What tree did you fall off?

There were only 5 people voting for NoLogo so far, in this thread. I'm having 70 pieces made.

If you check front panels of better equipment, you'll noticed that no "ticks" are there either (for volume).

PS: if logo print can be easily wiped off, I don't see any reason not to put it on, after all you might like it

 

[BrianGT]

I like the idea for the silkscreening. I like having a name on it, instead of the usual blank front panel.

--
Brian

 

[pkpickard]

silkscreening

I'm fine with the revised silkscreen.

Paul

 

[jhead]

Prefer the first one with the ITS dropped

 

[cowanrg]

im not trying to pick a fight peter, but there was just a whole page of people saying they didnt like the logo. if the majority like the logo, then thats the deciding factor!

i was just reading the posts. i personally dont care because im not getting one. sorry if i came across as accusational.

 

[jhead]

The revised one looks good to me besides if it is in fact easy to remove with acotone then it should be no problem for those who prefer the plain wrap to remove the lettering

 

[Peter Daniel]

Sorry if I was too rough in my reaction, but you have to look at the big picture here. This thread has 35 pages and one page doesn'y mean that much

Again, it was only 5 people, which comparing to the whole order is still not enough to change the design (at least 45 paid orders)

 

[cowanrg]

understood. my point was simply that i only read of like 7 people maybe commenting directly on the design. and of those people, 90% percent were not wanting the logo. agreed that MOST people that ordered were either complacent regarding the design, or simply not speaking up.

good work in the case though. i finally have time to work on all my stuff, and i hope i can make some pretty stuff for the forum too!

 

[scott_m]

This morning my opinion was for no text, but markings for volume and source - but during the course of the day my opinion softened somewhat, and coming home and seeing the revised drawings (with the smaller logo), I think I could live with it quite well. Especially if it is easily removed, then I've no problem with it. Thanks peter for you efforts.

Scott.

 

[tg3]

Much better. I like the smaller logo in the middle more than I thought I would.