Go Back   Home > Forums > >

Simple, no-math transformer snubber using Quasimodo test-jig
Simple, no-math transformer snubber using Quasimodo test-jig
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools
Old 25th September 2013, 10:55 PM   #1
Mark Johnson is offline Mark Johnson  United States
diyAudio Donor
diyAudio Member
Mark Johnson's Avatar
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Silicon Valley
Simple, no-math transformer snubber using Quasimodo test-jig
Default Simple, no-math transformer snubber using Quasimodo test-jig

A power transformer snubber is a wonderful thing for reducing or eliminating RFI from rectifier-induced LCR ringing. Unfortunately it's a huge pain to design and optimize a snubber. First you have to measure the transformer's leakage inductance and secondary capacitance, at about 100 kHz, which is not especially easy. Then you have to estimate the capacitance of your rectifier(s), which does not always appear on datasheets. Finally you plug these numbers into a formula that spits out snubber values -- and then you hope it's all correct.

Shown here is a little test jig called "Quasimodo the bell-ringer" which makes this process a great deal simpler. Quasimodo connects an actual snubber across the transformer, smacks the transformer to make it ring, and you observe the ringing on an oscilloscope. Then you adjust a (25 turn) potentiometer on the jig, watching the scope to find the setting which completely damps out all ringing. And you're done! Just use the same snubber values in the end product, as you used on the test-jig, and success is yours. (The 25 turn trimpot is socketed for ease of measuring the final resistance that gave perfect damping).

Attached are some scope waveforms showing a Quasimodo jig driving an Avel Lindberg toroidal transformer (from the Akitika GT-101 power amp). I set the trimpot to 5 different resistance values, and got the 5 traces shown. When the trimpot was removed from its socket (R = infinity), I got the black trace. A setting of Rtrimpot = 109 ohms (red trace) gave "critical damping" with no ringing: see yellow arrowhead.

Quasimodo gave an optimum snubber having critical damping (Greek letter zeta = 1.0), without requiring any calculations and without measuring the transformer's inductance or capacitance. It is a quick procedure, too: set Rtrim to max, observe waveshape on scope while reducing Rtrim, stop when all ringing is completely damped out, remove Rtrim from socket and measure it with an ohmmeter. About 3 minutes from start to finish.

This Avel Lindberg transformer has dual primaries for 115V/230V operation. So I configured the primaries the other way and ran Quasimodo again: figure attached. Not surprisingly, the optimum snubber for 230V operation is (slightly) different than the optimum for 115V operation: 120 ohms versus 109 ohms. Plus or minus the error tolerance of my ohmmeter, of course!

I've also attached a .pdf note that contains more details, schematics, construction tips, user guide, more "Quasimodo in action" scope photos, plus a bit of theory and a list of references.

EDIT 1: I had a small number of extra PCBoards + kits of all parts, which I sold at my cost, in October - December, 2013. They are all gone now, and I have no plans to sell any more. I encourage any energetic and enthusiastic diyAudio member to organize a Group Buy, using the PCB Gerber files and Bills Of Materials I provide in this thread. "CheapoModo" (a low cost version of Quasimodo) kits and PCBs are available in the Vendor's Bazaar, here.

EDIT 2: I have attached the PCB Gerber files and the Bill Of Materials, for both boards (V3_SMD, and V4_thru_hole) right here, to post #1. So now they are very easy to find!

EDIT 3: Answers to frequently asked questions:
  1. Build guide for V3 (SMD) is found in post #27
  2. Build guide for V4 (thru hole) is found in post #103
  3. 2 hour build time, quick-and-dirty Quasimodo on solderless protoboard (no PCB!) is found in post #18 and in (the CheapoModo thread)
  4. Substitute parts recommendations are found in the Bill Of Materials
  5. How to choose a MOSFET besides the ones in the BOM, is found in post #175
  6. How to check your own BOM before purchasing components, is found in post #203
  7. diyAudio members who have ordered their own sets of PCBoards from a PCB fab, using the Gerbers provided here, include: gazzagazza, luvdunhill, Borges, stormsonic, cwtim01, normundss, dsolodov, EUVL, kissmurphy, stephengrenfell, Piersma, SyncTronX, yoaudio, andrensairr. You can PM them to find out how easy or difficult it was.
. .
Attached Images
File Type: png Avel_USA.png (78.5 KB, 23599 views)
File Type: png Avel_Europe.png (70.1 KB, 23127 views)
File Type: png Quasimodo_V3_SMD_sch.png (48.6 KB, 23409 views)
File Type: png Quasimodo_V4_TH_sch.png (47.7 KB, 23301 views)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Quasimodo_jig_revA.pdf (817.4 KB, 7212 views)
File Type: zip QuasimodoSMD_Gerbers_and_everything_else.zip (104.7 KB, 1379 views)
File Type: zip Quasimodo_TH_Gerbers_and_everything_else.zip (347.1 KB, 2182 views)

Last edited by Mark Johnson; 26th January 2019 at 01:22 PM. Reason: link to CheapoModo
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2013, 02:02 AM   #2
Johno is offline Johno  Australia
diyAudio Donor
diyAudio Member
Johno's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tanunda SA
Simple, no-math transformer snubber using Quasimodo test-jig
Nice test jig and excellent application note.

It surprises me that many people who you would expect to know better do not understand that it is the resistor that does the snubbing and not the capacitor. The capacitance across the secondary (or across the rectifiers) only changes the ringing frequency and the capacitor in series with the snubber resistor is only there to limit its dissipation.

Somewhat of an evangelist for snubbers, I had been using the parametric measurement and calculation process for years and only recently turned to an in-circuit empirical approach similar to yours.

I now use Cx = 220n and Cs = 100n on all my snubbers and simply adjust a 2k single turn potentiometer to find the Rs value for optimum damping. However I do this in the actual, live circuit at close to the rated load current (I have some very large 10R resistors).

Final point is that the snubber components need to be located as close to the transformer as possible for the best results.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2013, 02:38 AM   #3
gootee is offline gootee  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Finally! Two people in a row who understand how snubbers work! (Make that three.)

Good work!!
The electrolytic capacitors ARE the signal path: http://www.fullnet.com/~tomg/zoom3a_33kuF.jpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2013, 02:47 AM   #4
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
kevinkr's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Simple, no-math transformer snubber using Quasimodo test-jig
Good stuff!
"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." - Thomas Paine
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2013, 02:58 AM   #5
TonyTecson is offline TonyTecson  Philippines
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
TonyTecson's Avatar
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Maybunga, Pasig City
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2013, 11:38 AM   #6
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Thank you.
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2013, 01:07 PM   #7
Bixbacon is offline Bixbacon  Australia
diyAudio Member
Bixbacon's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Australia
Default Great stuff

What a treat, thanks for the insight
Its not worth saying, if it's not heard wright.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2013, 01:22 PM   #8
ticktock is offline ticktock  Scotland
diyAudio Member
ticktock's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Great work !!

It's true that there's still lots of half-whisdom out there, even when you look at commercial gear.
Blaue Leuchtdioden machen blöd. (hb)
sent from NSA monitored device
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2013, 01:57 PM   #9
Max Headroom is offline Max Headroom  Australia
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Australia, near to the beach, natural ambient sounds mostly.
Hello Mark J (?), nice work, and thanks for your your thorough documentation.

Recently I got hold of a variable frequency/variable voltage regenerative AC power supply http://www.kikusui.co.jp/kiku_manuals/P/PCR_L_E7.PDF to try/prove a few experiments.

First on the list was to explore power supply frequency dependence of typical consumer level audio gear.
Subjective testing reveled that 50Hz supply sounded best with 50Hz recordings, 60Hz supply sounded best with 60Hz recordings...lowered non musical intermod products is the resultant, but 55Hz (which is musically related) sounded best regardless of supply or recording supply frequency.

With optimal snubbing this ought to be a moot point, but of course with typical audio gear none of this optimisation is implemented, and PSU ringing will crash straight through any PSRR, sub optimal earthing arangements further exacerbating the products/problems.

To extend the discussion, IME optimal snubbing applied directly across speaker drivers, and then further across the input terminals of loudspeakers to achieve flat impedance characteristic pays huge sonic dividends...most amplifiers measure well into resistance loads, but many can go sour when driving reactive loads.

Snubbing is a far too frequently ignored subject, and IME/IMO of paramount importance.

Regards, Dan.

Last edited by Max Headroom; 26th September 2013 at 02:14 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2013, 09:04 PM   #10
Mark Johnson is offline Mark Johnson  United States
diyAudio Donor
diyAudio Member
Mark Johnson's Avatar
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Silicon Valley
Simple, no-math transformer snubber using Quasimodo test-jig
Here's a photo of Quasimodo V.3 in operation. The 25 turn trimmer RV1 is clearly visible (dark blue box, upper right), and so is the injection capacitor C2 (light blue box, center), plugged into its socket with many pins. You also can see the three 8pin SOIC packages. It's a two layer board and if you look around you can find some vias. Frontside fill is VCC, backside fill is GND.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg twochan.jpg (477.9 KB, 22335 views)
  Reply With Quote


Simple, no-math transformer snubber using Quasimodo test-jigHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Balanced input test jig for speaker testing tvrgeek Equipment & Tools 6 3rd March 2013 07:56 PM
Simple test for transformer frequency response? bst Tubes / Valves 1 26th January 2010 09:26 PM
db, gain, and loudness. Simple math Pbassred Multi-Way 16 8th November 2005 03:13 PM
Please confirm my transformer math. leadbelly Tubes / Valves 7 12th March 2005 12:52 AM
CD player laser test jig Fantastic Digital Source 1 25th March 2003 04:45 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:11 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2021 diyAudio