How to design a folded Voigt Pipe???

djn,

I'm a lover of both open baffle sound and full range speakers. If you like the open baffle sound of your new drivers, then you could use your new drivers on OB and place them over a cabinet with a vented or sealed sub (really a woofer with enough extension to blend with your near full range driver). An extension of this idea is to add a second sub to fire backward and run the subs in bipolar fashion which would create a speaker with near omni-directional coverage in your room.

The beauty of this idea is that you have the full range driver crossed high enough so that the OB baffle width could be relatively narrow and not imposing in a normal listening room.

I've designed several mass loaded transmission lines (MLTL) (albeit with smaller drivers than yours) as you can read if you search this forum. Recently, I did some work with the Dayton Audio RS225-8 in a 30 inch tall cabinet and it yielded excellent results (3 dB down in the mid 20 Hzs range). While not a true subwoofer kind of performance, it would provide very good coverage and sound good crossed over to your OB full ranger. With dual drivers it has potential of better than 105 dB spl levels near Xmax.

Lots of ways to go with excellent coverage from an OB driver with bass augmentation.

Jim
 
Last edited:
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
An extension of this idea is to add a second sub to fire backward and run the subs in bipolar fashion which would create a speaker with near omni-directional coverage in your room.

At bass frequencies the woofer will be more or less omnidirectional no matter where you put the woofer in the box. Using a pair push-push does have huge advantages in terms of what the active vibration cancelation does.

Do note that a non-OB woofer may have issues near the XO as the “rear” of th eassembly will have a transition from out-of-phase (OB part) and in-phase where the woofer works.

Typically in an OB to improve bass (and mid-treble too) one adds 1 or 2 big *** woofers, biamp and EQ the bottom as necessary.

dave
 
Dave is correct on his comments about how woofers radiate as an omni-directional
source low frequencies. Assuming that djn is using his new field coil driver for this design, he has plenty of flexibility to position the crossover frequency as he chooses. Running the FC driver on open baffle mitigates any worry about conventional box design for it. The tradeoff is the width of the OB baffle accordingly for best sound to match with the woofer. He could cross at a lower frequency to mitigate any bipolar woofers wraparound transition mentioned by planet10 for example.

Another thought is to use a second woofer to increase the sensitivity of the woofers so that they more closely match to the FC unit sensitivity which is in the low 90s spl.

Jim
 
Last edited:
Yes, I really like the sound on OBs but I want to build they don't need low end support. I just picked up a pair of 4 cu ft diy cabs yesterday and I'd try them too. I know it wont be long before we sell this place for a smaller house will a smaller listening space. Them I won't have room for 4 subs.
 
Hi all. Just want to say these drivers sound very good on OBs (just for break in) and I am still trying to figure out what cabinet type will give the best bass. In OB they need a sub that goes up high.

Happy Holidaze and all that jive! :D

Which model did you buy, version FC-4 [vented]? If so, then based on published specs a ~Vb = Vas, Fb = Fs T/S max flat alignment is the default, though once all external resistance are factored in that raises Qts [effective Qts'], lowering its upper mass corner [2*Fs/Qts'] which in turn lowers its HF response and the XO point required with it now ideally needing a Vb > Vas, Fb < Fs alignment.

[ML] TLs will normally be tuned the same, but will require a greater net Vb to get adequate 1/4 WL TL vent damping whether mass loaded or not.

If the driver has variable damping [DF], then you can dial in a bunch of LF EQ [raise Qts'] to tonally balance it over a wider BW, better 'fit' it to the OB baffle/room.

GM
 
BiB - Half Wave Voigt

Also consider the Late Terry Cains BiB (Bigger is Better) Half wave Voigt based design. I believe Scottmoose and GM can help you there. I'm a planning to build a pair myself shortly based on the excellent Mark Audio CHS-70A's. I have a copy of the Mk2 excel spreadsheet if I can work out how to attach it again :)
 

Attachments

  • bib_calculator_v2 (1).zip
    65.7 KB · Views: 168
Last edited: