Your contribute to Audio evolution

Status
Not open for further replies.
this is what he reccorded
Thanks, I swear to listen to it left me breathless!
And I imagined that for the first time he was trying something unprecedented...
Really great experience, thanks again!

P.S.: I did not understand what it has to do with Debussy's Clair de Lune, though.
Which, among other things, is one of my favorite favorite pieces in absolute.
 
And back on topic Should Shockley be on the list?
There may be those who would discredit him and his compatriots because "only tubes make good sound."
The book at this website goes into Shockley's contributions to the early semiconductor industry, and from what I remember reading of it, he was as much of a showman (and businessman) as a scientist/engineer:
http://www.designinganalogchips.com/

One might also mention the invention/inventor of the semiconductor op-amp, Bob Widlar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Widlar#μA702_and_μA709. Though some purists don't like them (earlier ones were nowhere near as good as more recent ones), virtually every commercial recording from the past at least three or four decades as gone through at least one op-amp. And certainly Walt Jung deserves a mention here.
 
Shannon and Nyquist. They were way ahead of their time and without them sampling theory and digital audio wouldn't be a thing.

Tom

When you read Shannon's 1949 article "Communication in the presence of noise", you find he actually wrote about the sampling theorem: "This is a fact which is common knowledge in the communication art". The mathematical proof comes after that remark.

https://course.ccs.neu.edu/csg250/ShannonNoise.pdf
 
  • Like
Reactions: dreamth
Status
Not open for further replies.