An enormous amount of undiscovered wonderfuillness we have yet to tease out from fungi like these. And from bboth flora & fauna.
As an aside to early comments on using Psilocybin to tweal brain programming. In the 60s, Leary did research using this substance to reduce the rate at which they returned to prison from 70% to 30%.
coffee, tobacco, alcohol, cannibus, prescription drugs, non-prescription drugs (like vitamins)…. no drugs not gonna happen for 99.99% of the population.
dave
That changes the balance a lot. Use white noise and it's obvious.
;-)
May be, there is not chaos, there is low-complex order. And/or low-complex observation and description of "order", no matter which degree of complexity.
... or no understanding of "order"-)
May be, there is not chaos, there is low-complex order. And/or low-complex observation and description of "order", no matter which degree of complexity.
... or no understanding of "order"-)
Maybe the opposite. No way to vouch for its accuracy but I always found this fascinating:
I never said I didn't get what he is talking about. I just have met some serious scientists back at university and none of them spoke in absolutes.
Ah well if you are talking psychology or philosphy I can't comment. As a younger man I avoided philosophy of science types. Now I realise I could have learned from them but youth is impetuous.
How do you know it's an apple? It's more interesting to ask what the molecules in that apple used to be. There could be part of every human that ever lived in that one fruit.
Well that's interesting.
It works great with Norton and Thevenin analysis of complex reactive circuits. It's the go to way of calculating crossover circuits for those of us that do it without computer programs).
Edit: I'm referring to complex numbers. I was talking with my buddy the other day and he thought they were nonsense until i showed him how they describe a reactive circuit.
Now, the $12,500 retail price means that the parts cost is around $2500.
And the parts cost depends on how many parts you buy.
And how many parts you buy depends on how many units you sell.
That's true. Its the physical world that is fuzzy, not the logic of math. That said, Fuzzy Logic was designed to better represent/model the physical world.
I know. That was the point. If you spend a year designing a product for a particular market and you will probably only ever sell 100 - 200 units, then how much do you have to charge for one unit in order to cover your development costs and stay in business? The high end audio market is low sales volume, products have to look nice, and development time can be substantial in some cases. Its like, how many of those $12.5k boxes do you think they sell?
My experience too with the good ones. However, the tests that you have learn how to pass usually require right or wrong answers that are a number or a probability. They don't allow for the fuzzy nature of physical reality. Fuzzyness is more about partial membership in multiple distinct classification sets, where classification membership is to an approximate degree.
Trying to remember some professor, maybe it was Leeson (of the Leeson equation), who said something to the effect that we don't tell you the whole truth until you are a PhD student. We don't have the time to spend with every student to develop their intuition about the real world we work in. We have to limit what teach most students. We can only spend the time to really mentor a few who are the cream of the crop that make it to the top.
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.