Why not "instrumentation amplifiers"

Status
Not open for further replies.
ok, I was reading one of the ADI ap-notes on instrumentation amplifiers, I realize that they aren't any good as integrators and differentiators, are somewhat expensive -- but why aren't people using them as gain blocks in audio applications? Is it just the expense, is it the necessity of nulling offset, <em> dit a mois pour
 
Re: Why not &quot;instrumentation amplifiers&quot;

jackinnj said:
ok, I was reading one of the ADI ap-notes on instrumentation amplifiers, I realize that they aren't any good as integrators and differentiators, are somewhat expensive -- but why aren't people using them as gain blocks in audio applications? Is it just the expense, is it the necessity of nulling offset, <em> dit a mois pour


...see:

http://www.jensen-transformers.com/an/ingenaes.pdf
 
stokessd said:
Lots of people DO use them. I have a phono stage design which uses BB INA103's in the front end.

-----------------------------------------------
I have one of these in a Carver Active/Passive Preamp. The balanced output is passive; the single ended has gain and contains the IN103. In comparison with the passive mode, the single ended mode doen't sound very good at all - you wouldn't use it unless you MUST.
 
they work...

yes,I built the design found in 'audio amateur' 6/95 ; 'An instrumentation preamp' and over the yrs. substituted various op-amps for the originally speced tl-072's. I am quite impressed with this simple design and still use it today-
 
Re: they work...

vince8 said:
yes,I built the design found in 'audio amateur' 6/95 ; 'An instrumentation preamp' and over the yrs. substituted various op-amps for the originally speced tl-072's. I am quite impressed with this simple design and still use it today-


Do you have the schematic...can you post it? 🙂
 
Re: they work...

vince8 said:
yes,I built the design found in 'audio amateur' 6/95 ; 'An instrumentation preamp' and over the yrs. substituted various op-amps for the originally speced tl-072's. I am quite impressed with this simple design and still use it today-

Are you sure the design wasn't in 2/95 "An Instrumentation Preamp" ?

While there are now better power supply designs, the author did add a soft start feature which prevented turn-on thump, and a soft-finish feature which powered off the preamp first, then the power supply. The pre-amp used multiple TL-072's in an "instrumentation" configuration, but not an off-the-shelf instrumentation operational amplifier.

I have some ADI and TI (Burr-Brown) Instrumentation ampls to play with. I guess the thing to do is compare to the TL-072's.

Jack
 

Attachments

  • isntrumentation.gif
    isntrumentation.gif
    6.5 KB · Views: 405
Instrumentation amps are (were) generally designed for measurement applications where a very high input impedance was desirable, and so the design og these op-amps tended to focus on low voltage noise. So until relatively recently only instrumentaion amps offered the sort of noise performance required for an all op-amp preamplifier, compare with discret front end designs.

Modern op-amps with audio applications in mind generally have better balance between voltage and current noise (e.g AD797), are suitably low noise, and are probably easier to design with IMO.
 
instrumentation op-amp

yes,it was the 2/95 edition of audio electronics.I was looking at the month,(june) and thought 6/95 was appropriate. In any case,I'm not sophisticated enough to argue the merits of this design over another. I built it without the 'de-thumping' additions...with a decent +- 15 volt supply, and have played with the gain/ various resistors, and different ways of taking signal from source to power amp. Mikek...I have no scanner to share schematic, but it's essentially the same as has been already posted- I'm hoping I'll not be banned for playing with these op-amps...which are only for people in a hurry-?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.