If the xo- point at 2,5 kHz isn't a must, why not use a Visaton MHT 12?
http://www.visaton.de/english/artikel/art_684_1_83.html
Newly avaiable with minor modifications and as selected pair (selection costs 25 EUR extra per pair)...
IMHO
http://www.visaton.de/english/artikel/art_684_1_83.html
Newly avaiable with minor modifications and as selected pair (selection costs 25 EUR extra per pair)...
IMHO
Well, I'm using the "AL 170" in my current system. They need a little correction to handle their membrane resonances, but they are worth the money...
I'm planning to use the "AL 130 M" (out of stock) in a classic 3- way- System when the time is ready for it...
But I heard the "AL 130" in a comparision to the "TI 100 M", and there wasn't much difference between them...
But like all aluminium cones:
If you can handle the resonances, they are really good.
I'm planning to use the "AL 130 M" (out of stock) in a classic 3- way- System when the time is ready for it...
But I heard the "AL 130" in a comparision to the "TI 100 M", and there wasn't much difference between them...
But like all aluminium cones:
If you can handle the resonances, they are really good.
Re: any Aussies try this one?
Hi Sony,
What size bass driver were you originally looking at? I'm assuming it was a fairly small, fast driver.
The LCY unit looks like a nice product, but in all honesty, in a previous life I've shyed away from the cup-shaped 'horn like' HF drivers like that. I have found that dispersion suffers somewhat compared to other designs. I'm sure others here will chime in on this one.
If it were me dropping that much $$ on a set, I'd make sure to check ALL avenues before making a decision...
FWIW,
Mark
Sony said:The Icy has the interesting advantage of the low xo-point for 2-way designs.
Is it sold in Europe?
For using the Visaton, in my 2-way project, I will have to find another woofer, that likes to be crossed at 3KHz...
Hi Sony,
What size bass driver were you originally looking at? I'm assuming it was a fairly small, fast driver.
The LCY unit looks like a nice product, but in all honesty, in a previous life I've shyed away from the cup-shaped 'horn like' HF drivers like that. I have found that dispersion suffers somewhat compared to other designs. I'm sure others here will chime in on this one.
If it were me dropping that much $$ on a set, I'd make sure to check ALL avenues before making a decision...
FWIW,
Mark
Mark, I could use the ribbon tweeter in any of these two projects I have running:
- 2 way with 5" aluminium woofer.
xo-point at 2.5KHz. 4th order active.
- 3.5 way with soft dome 2.5" midrange and two 8" woofers.
xo-points: 4KHz; 1KHz, 200Hz. 2nd order passive.
When you mention 'other designs' are you considering conventional aluminium tweeters?
I have two conventional tweeters that use a short exponential horn, and have good dispersion.
Should I expect a loss in dispersion with a ribbon tweeter?
- 2 way with 5" aluminium woofer.
xo-point at 2.5KHz. 4th order active.
- 3.5 way with soft dome 2.5" midrange and two 8" woofers.
xo-points: 4KHz; 1KHz, 200Hz. 2nd order passive.
When you mention 'other designs' are you considering conventional aluminium tweeters?
I have two conventional tweeters that use a short exponential horn, and have good dispersion.
Should I expect a loss in dispersion with a ribbon tweeter?
Sony said:Mark, I could use the ribbon tweeter in any of these two projects I have running:
- 2 way with 5" aluminium woofer.
xo-point at 2.5KHz. 4th order active.
- 3.5 way with soft dome 2.5" midrange and two 8" woofers.
xo-points: 4KHz; 1KHz, 200Hz. 2nd order passive.
When you mention 'other designs' are you considering conventional aluminium tweeters?
I have two conventional tweeters that use a short exponential horn, and have good dispersion.
Should I expect a loss in dispersion with a ribbon tweeter?
Glad to hear you have a few project options to drop these units into. I've found it a bit tricky to match drivers to ribbons in the past - especially well crafted ribbons.
Not other designs, just other ribbons; obviously you are limited to what is available as compared to something like domes.
When executed properly, ribbons are awesome - fast, detailed and very accurate. But as you know there are always tradeoffs when designing such products. When I see a design shaped like a cup, the old world thinking in me sees a potential tradeoff in dispersion at higher frequencies for a slight boost in efficiency the horn-like shape provides without affecting the overall cost of the driver.
But as I say, its old world thinking and since I do not have a pair to test, I can't back this statement up.
Best of luck in your projects and I'm sure that whatever unit you chose, it will be a good one!
Mark
Re: any Aussies try this one?
I'm not an Aussie, but I think they sound very good.
PeteMcK said:
I'm not an Aussie, but I think they sound very good.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Banned
Joined 2002
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Which ribbon tweeter?