What is the Universe expanding into..

Do you think there was anything before the big bang?

  • I don't think there was anything before the Big Bang

    Votes: 56 12.5%
  • I think something existed before the Big Bang

    Votes: 200 44.7%
  • I don't think the big bang happened

    Votes: 54 12.1%
  • I think the universe is part of a mutiverse

    Votes: 201 45.0%

  • Total voters
    447
Status
Not open for further replies.
What's amazing to me, is how scientists could predict the gravity of other celestial bodies, navigating their things (push/pull, or pull/push). That an object could meet one time/space and be catapulted further, into another continuum. It's incredible.
 
Last edited:
Here is a graphic from MM showing the path of a satellite (a lump of rock) captured by the Earth as it rotated around the sun. The satellite remained tethered to the Earth for about 12-yrs before wandering off again, probably due to the gravitational disturbance of the sun and other planets.
 

Attachments

  • 4D4F2306-CAD5-476C-9BD0-DE84BCE77335.jpeg
    4D4F2306-CAD5-476C-9BD0-DE84BCE77335.jpeg
    337.5 KB · Views: 177
Let me fix this for you:

attachment.php


Motion Mountain - The Captivating Free Physics Pdf Book

Motion Mountain p192 Vol 1 said:
Figure 148 An example of irregular orbit, partly measured and partly calculated, due to the
gravitational attraction of several masses: the orbit of the temporary Earth quasi-satellite 2003 YN107 in
geocentric coordinates. This asteroid, with a diameter of 20(10) m, became orbitally trapped near the
Earth around 1995 and remained so until 2006. The black circle represents the Moon’s orbit around the
Earth. (© Seppo Mikkola).

Just my opinion, Bonsai, but a sloppy piece of work. Always give the references. 😀
 
That was rather good, Galu! But gave me terrible vertigo... 😀

I hate heights and precipices! 😱

Getting back to Bonsai's surprising bit of orbital mechanics, I read an amazing book about the surprising subtleties of gravity and the solar system:

Calculating the Cosmos: How Mathematics Unveils the Universe: Amazon.co.uk: Stewart, Professor Ian: 9781781254318: Books

We had this fascinating Jupiter/Saturn conjunction at Christmas:

902378d1608146047-universe-expanding-jupiter-saturn-conjunction-jpg


I have always been amazed by Jupiter's moons in 1:2:4 orbital resonance:

902377d1608146047-universe-expanding-260px-galilean_moon_laplace_resonance_animation-gif


Callisto and Ganymede have an approx 22:7 ratio of orbital times. Don't know if Callisto is holding this thing together, Or Io's highly elliptical orbit.

You never see all three in a line. But this is not a permanent state of affairs. BTW, Wiki has got the animation wrong. Strictly speaking the 1:2:4 resonance is reference the perihelion of IO. It precesses. It is estimated that Mercury could end up anywhere over the next few Billion years. It could even be ejected from the solar system altogether. The rings of Saturn are also only a current phenomenen. Might last only another Million years before becoming unstable.
 
Last edited:
I have always been amazed by Jupiter's moons in 1:2:4 orbital resonance.
And, of course, orbital resonances also apply to entire galaxies!

"Resonances in the stellar orbital motion under perturbations from the spiral arm structure can play an important role in the evolution of the disks of spiral galaxies."
Modelling resonances and orbital chaos in disk galaxies - Application to a Milky Way spiral model | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)

One of the main questions which divides the astronomical community is the lifetime of the spiral structure. Some studies suggest that that spiral arms are transient, appearing and disappearing in a recurrent way.

This article looks at the formation of 'bars' in spiral galaxies and analyses their lives and deaths: Secular Evolution in Disk Galaxies - John Kormendy

fig12.jpg


It's all putting my head in a spin! :spin:
 
I forget where I saw one of these things, maybe the Science Museum. I seem to remember a crowd would gather at midday to see the curator start it up.

Foucault's Pendulum:
I saw one around age 12 (circa 1970) at one of the Smithsonian museums in Washington DC. There was lots of good stuff there. It's been on my bucket list to go back.

Another thing I remember seeing there was the computer memory CRTs they used before developing core memory. In recent years I read some computer history book about it (the cost spurred on the development of the more reliable and cheaper core memory that replaced it). The tubes were expensive, they had a limited life and so had to be replaced fairly often. The cost of memory using these tubes was about one dollar per bit per month.
 
Foucault's pendulum is an interesting experiment. Sufficiently good engineers could have built one 5,000 years ago. I wonder if they did? 😕

Foucault pendulum - Wikipedia

My investigations have revealed that 30 degrees is the crucial angle:

934043d1616243925-universe-expanding-sine-function-2-jpg


But what I most noticed is that the Great Pyramid was built on a latitude of 30N. Coincidence? I think not. 😎

Pyramid Calculator

Great Pyramid of Giza - Wikipedia

The height was 280 Royal Cubits. The length of the 4 bases 440 Royal Cubits. A Cubit being about half a metre.

Perimeter length over height = 1760 / 280 = 6.2857...

That is 2 Pi, my friends. Mystery of Pyramids solved. 😀
 
Status
Not open for further replies.