well it was a long time ago, in a galaxy ...
you know the rest
I'd loved to have seen a Zack Snyder / Douglas Adams collaboration - but I digress
you know the rest
I'd loved to have seen a Zack Snyder / Douglas Adams collaboration - but I digress
Yeh... got stuck with other "issues" that slowed my productivity and distracted me from the subject... got to put in some energy (and increase entropy 😀 )....
... perhaps we all ought to meet at Milliways
Mysterious dance of dwarf galaxies may force a cosmic rethink -- ScienceDaily
Suppose a whole bunch of entangled holes in this here snowglobe
simultaneously went white <BANG> Now further supposin' them thar
holes prior to goin splodie had accumulated a spin. Yeah, go figure.
Where your dwarf galaxies now?
Wrecks hard on my donut theory, since the above wants for singular
point hole theory. Unless there is some relativity excuse for donuts
and holes all the same same depending how you look at em. I don't
have the slightest idea how I could twist up a lie that big and sell it
as plausible sci-fi, but open to sufficiently ridiculous suggestions.
I just don't know how you could entangle donuts or bounce them
white off the quantum impossibility of infinite density. If donut
horizons are are thin toroids, maybe they could still achieve the
required density for bounce, but how you make them em all go
white at once? Makes singularity excuse for entanglement seem
more plausible. I don't really understand entaglement, nor do I
believe in singularities, so I am a poor judge of what mechanism
might seem a plausible substitute here...
Somehow this <BANG> has to re-seed the universe with matter
and the yardsticks that make empty spaces between seem short.
Could a pattern consistent with observation be achieved or not?
Suppose a whole bunch of entangled holes in this here snowglobe
simultaneously went white <BANG> Now further supposin' them thar
holes prior to goin splodie had accumulated a spin. Yeah, go figure.
Where your dwarf galaxies now?
Wrecks hard on my donut theory, since the above wants for singular
point hole theory. Unless there is some relativity excuse for donuts
and holes all the same same depending how you look at em. I don't
have the slightest idea how I could twist up a lie that big and sell it
as plausible sci-fi, but open to sufficiently ridiculous suggestions.
I just don't know how you could entangle donuts or bounce them
white off the quantum impossibility of infinite density. If donut
horizons are are thin toroids, maybe they could still achieve the
required density for bounce, but how you make them em all go
white at once? Makes singularity excuse for entanglement seem
more plausible. I don't really understand entaglement, nor do I
believe in singularities, so I am a poor judge of what mechanism
might seem a plausible substitute here...
Somehow this <BANG> has to re-seed the universe with matter
and the yardsticks that make empty spaces between seem short.
Could a pattern consistent with observation be achieved or not?
Last edited:
I just ate a donut that the universe took 13 odd billion years to make out of nothing but hydrogen, the universe is great
Thankyou for my donut universe
Thankyou for my donut universe
I think that post required something with much more brain-bending capability than c. sativa...p. cubensis seems a more likely source of inspiration!
Apologies if this has already made an appearance 😀 Its pretty neat though.
The Scale of the Universe 2
Edit... now I see the link I think it has.
The Scale of the Universe 2
Edit... now I see the link I think it has.
They do not know what existed before the big bang and what there was before the big bang.
No, the universe is not all there is. The mind is everything. Everything exist in the mind.
Time is a concept for us mere living thing and finite things. IF the universe is infinite, time do not exist. And I do think that It goes on and on and on forever.
Thats the thing, it will never end as long as you dont follow the damn road, and the road is pretty steep it seems!
"The mind doesn't exist before the universe. And before the universe will never expire. ...Speed & Time are relative to non-existence, right.
And we live in a dimension-less space where mind and time and light and darkness are inconsequential of their inconsistency." - Bob (me)
That's my take anyway, and not from any mind.
Do we mind?
Last edited:
Awesome link, awesome man Frank!
Pure extrapolation, deep thinking of the universe before, during and after. ...If.
...The natural flow of my state of mind.
* The universe is everything, and before everything we don't know what kind of mind there was, even less if there was.
The universe will never cease to exist, because it's everything, and everything doesn't have a beginning and an end.
Speed is a variable, 'unquantifiable' in itself, and time is absolutely relative, undefined in space.
We don't know how many dimensions there are, and we might even live in less than one dimension ourselves, dimension-less.
Our mind, our time, ...man's creations, presence and absence of light, have no consequence, no consistence real in everything the universe.
...Pure philosophy, free psychology. ...For man made created mind.
...Everything in the universe; there is.
I prophesise, Bob, ... that one day the universe will end - how's that, 😛? Wanna hang 'round, and check out whether I'm right or not ... 😉 ?
...No more theories?
I guess not.
Was anyone able to establish the current shape, weight etcetera?
😉
- Status
- Not open for further replies.