What is the Universe expanding into..

Do you think there was anything before the big bang?

  • I don't think there was anything before the Big Bang

    Votes: 56 12.5%

  • I think something existed before the Big Bang

    Votes: 200 44.7%

  • I don't think the big bang happened

    Votes: 54 12.1%

  • I think the universe is part of a mutiverse

    Votes: 201 45.0%
  • Total voters
    447
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jump to Latest
#921
There must be something or why would we be talking about nothing?

sprite-initial.png
 
#923
NorthStar said:
...And what we know is not much @ all.
Click to expand...


+1 - or should that be + infinity and beyond

To quote the summary of all human knowledge as condensed by the award winning deep thinker Donald Rumsfeld:

Reports that say there's -- that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things that we know that we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, the ones we don't know we don't know.
 
#927
NorthStar said:
Chris, suppose that the universe is a reflection; where is the shadow?
Click to expand...

OK but a reflection of what?

A mirror is a 2D representation of a 3D object.
Is the universe a 4D (time) representation of another dimension?

Oh no were back to the Grays again..LOL there not aliens they are from another dimension.
Someone said to me the other day how would you know if you were in an alien test simulation program (a bit like the sims) running on some super mainframe computer. Then they said it would not matter because the universe in the simulation would still be real to us. If it ended so would we..

I laughed and said that would mean someone was pulling the strings and we would be puppets..
My friend said I didn't think we were talking about chaos theory..

Does cause and effect have purpose?:scratch:

Regards
M. Gregg
 
Last edited:
#936
I dunno bout wormholes, but suppose all black holes (the singularity
type, as opposed to donut theory) are one and the same at the bottom.

This would allow everything to eventually settle out into a unified
singularity regardless of distance (might that also be entanglement?)

Then when one turns white, everything captured from everywhere and
anywhere explodes out of it (or all of them), starting the universe over...

Doesn't require everything be captured and recycled, though probably
most of it should by then. Given a few, how many years did they say???
Some junk could still be floating about from a previous universe, but
wouldn't necessarily look or behave any different, just older...

Why aren't holes capturing all the dark matter anyway? Or are they?
If they can't effectively trap dark matter, it might survive a recycle.
 
Last edited:
#937
Reciprocity, synchronicity, expanding universe, ...simply fascinating and mind boggling!

And now 'entanglemently' googling. ...And the bigger our goggles (pair of ultra telescopes) the closer we can reach the farthest unknown.

It's only through the invisible that we can make visible discoveries.
And all the theories of the world have yet to be confirmed and re-theorized all over again.
 
#938
The thread has slowed down; it shouldn't. ...This is the greatest subject of them all.
...Space discoveries, the universe, mankind, the brain, space travel, artificial intelligence, the multiverse, Adolf* Einstein, 'c', the theory of relativity, ...

* Alfred or Albert? 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom