I thought audio was just one big cruel joke for you?
I didnt say it was a funny joke, just a nerdy pun that I missed putting into the quark post. Down being one of the types of quarks and gangstars liking to think they are 'down'
I didnt say it was a funny joke, just a nerdy pun that I missed putting into the quark post. Down being one of the types of quarks and gangstars liking to think they are 'down'
Last edited:
What is humour ...?
I was alluding to "releasing" a joke in "discrete packets or bundles" of amusement - quanta of humour, so to speak ... 😉
I was alluding to "releasing" a joke in "discrete packets or bundles" of amusement - quanta of humour, so to speak ... 😉
blame the edit time, it should have been all together for your raucous reading pleasure en mass. agreed it was a stretch, thus the apology, but better jokes that are unfunny than hilarious 'factual' assertions made in all seriousness.
There used to be quarks called 'truth' and 'beauty' but I suppose such concepts are meaningless to modern folk so they got renamed to the rather more boring 'top' and 'bottom'.
At least we still have 'strange' and 'charm' quarks.
At least we still have 'strange' and 'charm' quarks.
I do not think it really have anything to do with "expensive stuff"..
It may be more by accident that the specs that are affected by the quantum mechanism are better for silver than copper, and again better for gold than silver.
Due to that I have ordered a very low cost material that after my calculations should have 50% better specs in regard of the quantum mechanism than gold.
When the standard electrical specs and the specs that are affected by the quantum mechanism are taken into account and both specs are given the same weighting the very low cost material get the same total index as copper.
This may be a good evaluation of what matters most - the standard electrical specs or the specs that are affected by the quantum mechanism..
What is this 'quantum mechanism' of which you speak? I am aware of a few quantum effects, and I can look up others in the graduate-level textbooks I have. Which particular one are you referring to?
BNC no. RCA yes. What maters are the cable quality including length, coupling caps used in the signal path and to be really anal the 75ohmis shunt to ground resistor quality. No transformer. All the good cables out there have RCA. The termination doesn't matter.
Erm! I'm also interested in what all this means, cos it baffles me at the moment.
What, we are talking about digital signal transmission, from what you have posted I think you are mistaking it for analogue signal transmission.
How is the resistor quality gonna effect the signal?
What do you mean when you refer to cable length?
What sort of cable quality are we referring to?
RCA is NOT an impedance controlled connector, how can it be better than BNC?
Why no transformer, Ethernet gets by quite well with a transformer in the circuit and that's higher throughput than SPDIF.....
So have you any facts and figures to support your statements?
Quantum information is just a term identifying a method of abstraction to "black box" an aspect of physics much like electrical troubleshooting, but its obvious all the people talking out of the side of their mouth about quantum in marketing(which is not always hype but none here could tell the difference anyway) don't even grasp this basic concept.
Every electron matters every detail of every detail matters. Obviously signals transmit with more integrity through pure crystal structures because of their geometry. You all know your digital infalibility falls apart at high frequency which means it falls apart at all frequencies. Just a bunch of hot air mainstream conformatism of average ignorance. There is no analogue cable and or digital cable if one is good at transmitting one kind of signal; it's good at transmitting another assuming its tailored for its bandwidth using similar methodology. Better conductors provide for higher bandwidth and they matter because they transmit signals with higher signal integrity.
People always laugh at things they haven't tried(or can't afford to(more money does not always mean more but better processes do and those often cost more especially when they affect or are more expensive materials at the atomic level which is derived from historic value and not actual material cost)) and go into situations with their mind made up and hear what they want to hear(or lie to themselves and everyone else to save face). Honestly, with the attitudes in this thread do you think these people have ever tried listening to the differences without going into the session with preconceptions? Your mind is made up before you even conduct any tests. This is not scientific method and yes peoples ears are a way to tell a difference because no other method exists that is well defined enough to prove anything(Which means your argument is up **** creek; not ours. Since ours is the only way to prove any improvement and you can't prove anything either way with all of your analysis). Yes, people lie. Yes, peoples senses can't be trusted. Their tastes can't be trusted. Sure there is placebo and emotions play a factor mood etc etc but we all know there are differences in speakers so there are differences in amplifiers too and cables and people tend to think certain ones are better than others when you really dig in and read all the reviews(which is the only way to eliminate erroneous individual human factor). James Randi and Bob Carver adding their 60hz humm don't matter. I doubt if you tune things to make make them worse that it would be hard to tell the difference in quality of anything(Their own test setup is a cheat. Besides, getting everything right in 20 double blinds in a row is statistically very remote especially with a 60hz humm added). James Randi is a typical mainsteam mindlocked fool that is so ignorant of the world around him(there are so many more significant things he could expose but I think his grandest of all is reading archeological findings that jesus was not real which is very basic in understanding that all of mainstream television beats into you on a daily basis) that he directs his energy at what is easily provable and obvious to the ignorant masses. He is the kind of person which many in here are that gain some kind of sense of tribal and societal duty and comradery because he is a cynic that is unable to directly engage in those activities.
Every electron matters every detail of every detail matters. Obviously signals transmit with more integrity through pure crystal structures because of their geometry. You all know your digital infalibility falls apart at high frequency which means it falls apart at all frequencies. Just a bunch of hot air mainstream conformatism of average ignorance. There is no analogue cable and or digital cable if one is good at transmitting one kind of signal; it's good at transmitting another assuming its tailored for its bandwidth using similar methodology. Better conductors provide for higher bandwidth and they matter because they transmit signals with higher signal integrity.
People always laugh at things they haven't tried(or can't afford to(more money does not always mean more but better processes do and those often cost more especially when they affect or are more expensive materials at the atomic level which is derived from historic value and not actual material cost)) and go into situations with their mind made up and hear what they want to hear(or lie to themselves and everyone else to save face). Honestly, with the attitudes in this thread do you think these people have ever tried listening to the differences without going into the session with preconceptions? Your mind is made up before you even conduct any tests. This is not scientific method and yes peoples ears are a way to tell a difference because no other method exists that is well defined enough to prove anything(Which means your argument is up **** creek; not ours. Since ours is the only way to prove any improvement and you can't prove anything either way with all of your analysis). Yes, people lie. Yes, peoples senses can't be trusted. Their tastes can't be trusted. Sure there is placebo and emotions play a factor mood etc etc but we all know there are differences in speakers so there are differences in amplifiers too and cables and people tend to think certain ones are better than others when you really dig in and read all the reviews(which is the only way to eliminate erroneous individual human factor). James Randi and Bob Carver adding their 60hz humm don't matter. I doubt if you tune things to make make them worse that it would be hard to tell the difference in quality of anything(Their own test setup is a cheat. Besides, getting everything right in 20 double blinds in a row is statistically very remote especially with a 60hz humm added). James Randi is a typical mainsteam mindlocked fool that is so ignorant of the world around him(there are so many more significant things he could expose but I think his grandest of all is reading archeological findings that jesus was not real which is very basic in understanding that all of mainstream television beats into you on a daily basis) that he directs his energy at what is easily provable and obvious to the ignorant masses. He is the kind of person which many in here are that gain some kind of sense of tribal and societal duty and comradery because he is a cynic that is unable to directly engage in those activities.
Go to the first post of this thread. Digital interconnects ! Peter Daniles has more credibility than I do read his "Pushing tda1543 to the limit". digital reciver CS IC. This is my opinion that I am posting to anyone reading this thread for educational porposes. it was not a direct a replay to your post.
I'm pleased you didn't decide to hold your breath, as we are still waiting for a simple reply from our friend Ray. Perhaps he has got trapped in a quantum tunnel wavefunction collapse?SY said:
Oh dear; enough "hot air" here to make a cup of tea!ColdFlo said:
Please don't hold your breath as the new materials for evaluation will not arrive shortly, and the preparations may take some time as I am off for a 5 weeks vacation 😀
- Status
- Not open for further replies.