VFET-X (or my 1/3 40th Anniversary Sony VFET Clone)

Member
Joined 2012
Paid Member
Made some nice progress this week, actually tested / biased both halves of the amplifier channel.
I spray painted the PCB's white. Gives a nice look better then the two discolored PCB's.
Mounted all components. Mounted all FET's with mica and goop...lots of work:)
With first testing it seems like the heat is getting easy of the VFETs and off the T-bar to the 15mm ALU sheet. So that looks promising.
That heat was my biggest problem with the VFET CSX1.

Initially some problems with a big startup current which results in a limiting lab PSU. I had them at 1 ampere for testing purpose. After setting the lab supply to 4 amps the output stage started.
I changed the C1 and C2 to 470uF and R37/R38 to 2k21 ( Teabag/Botte mod), much better, lower startup current through the VFET's.
I did see Papa has changed C3 and C4 to 47uF instead of 220uF in the last DIY VFET schematic. So I must try that also.
Also the voltage at the VFETs is about 18.7 Volts.... a bit low, so I must play with R13 and R14 to get them a bit higher.

For testing I put in some 0.1 Ohm source resistors to see if the current is evenly distributed, and it was. The VFET's were matched some time ago, so that was expected...
I have a lot of pictures:D:)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6025ww.jpg
    IMG_6025ww.jpg
    272 KB · Views: 1,360
  • IMG_6047ww.jpg
    IMG_6047ww.jpg
    254.8 KB · Views: 794
  • IMG_6046ww.jpg
    IMG_6046ww.jpg
    289.6 KB · Views: 818
  • IMG_6042ww.jpg
    IMG_6042ww.jpg
    395 KB · Views: 563
  • IMG_6041ww.jpg
    IMG_6041ww.jpg
    297.4 KB · Views: 611
  • IMG_6039ww.jpg
    IMG_6039ww.jpg
    381.2 KB · Views: 570
  • IMG_6035ww.jpg
    IMG_6035ww.jpg
    322.7 KB · Views: 1,160
  • IMG_6034ww.jpg
    IMG_6034ww.jpg
    197.7 KB · Views: 1,213
  • IMG_6033ww.jpg
    IMG_6033ww.jpg
    246.5 KB · Views: 1,258
  • IMG_6026ww.jpg
    IMG_6026ww.jpg
    244.4 KB · Views: 1,318
Member
Joined 2012
Paid Member
A new Milestone

This is what I wanted to check: can the heatsinks, alu sheet combination dissipate all the heat when running each VFET at 1 Ampere?
And yes it can :D:) I'm happy.
I can continue building at a slower pace...

This heatsink is monstrous, it's a whole other league, it's Pass labs vs. Firstwatt.... Wow.

I mounted the T-bar on the Alu sheet and the heatsinks on the Alu sheet for initial testing, without further polishing or cooling paste, so things can only get better.
Better conducting of the heat and thus cooler transistors.

As you can see in the picture it's dissipating 28x2x4= 224 Watts.
After one hour heatsinks are around 48 degrees, T-bar around 54 and the top of the VFETs around 62 degrees.

And yes on the last picture it is slowly starting to look as the real '40 years Anniversary Sony VFET amp'
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6073ww.jpg
    IMG_6073ww.jpg
    311.2 KB · Views: 727
  • IMG_6071ww.jpg
    IMG_6071ww.jpg
    356.4 KB · Views: 608
  • IMG_6068ww.jpg
    IMG_6068ww.jpg
    347.3 KB · Views: 549
  • IMG_6064ww.jpg
    IMG_6064ww.jpg
    272.9 KB · Views: 532
  • IMG_6058ww.jpg
    IMG_6058ww.jpg
    375.7 KB · Views: 524
  • IMG_6057ww.jpg
    IMG_6057ww.jpg
    409.7 KB · Views: 520
  • IMG_6056ww.jpg
    IMG_6056ww.jpg
    344.5 KB · Views: 598
Last edited:
Member
Joined 2012
Paid Member
What I like about these VFET output stage is that when they heat up the bias gets a bit lower. Not like the F5T which gets higher and higher when warming up.
So no thermal runaway...
What I also like is that the output offset stays so low, about 15 mV difference between cold start and completely heated up. I have never experienced such stable behavior with my amps.
I'm still fiddling with my startup behavior, lowering C5 and C6 from 220uF to 100uF makes a big difference, much lower initial current flow through the VFETs.
It's a pity I'm out of 47uF Elna Silmic caps. Have to order and try those.
 
Member
Joined 2012
Paid Member
I have been matching and selecting pairs for my VFET amp and need some experts vision...
The VFET pairs are measured like this:

Ids (Ampere) Vgs (Volts)
2SK82 VFET#10 VFET#9
0 11.28 11.03
0,05 10.69 10.53
0,1 10.40 10.32
0,15 10.17 10.15
0,2 9.98 9.98
0,25 9.82 9.84
0,3 9.67 9.71
0,35 9.54 9.58
0,4 9.41 9.46
0,45 9.30 9.34
0,5 9.18 9.22
0,6 8.97 8.99
0,7 8.75 8.78
0,8 8.55 8.56
0,9 8.35 8.34
1 8.15 8.12
1,1 7.96 7.91
1,2 7.77 7.70
1,3 7.58 7.49
1,4 7.38 7.28
1,5 7.20 7.07
1,6 7.00 6.85
1,7 6.81 6.65
1,8 6.62 6.43
1,9 6.42 6.22
2 6.24 6.02

I am selecting which VFET-pairs goes in which side of the channel, and also which N-channel matches best with which P-channel pair.
They will be biased around 1 Ampere.
So I can look at a pair and see how much voltage is needed to go from 0.5 to 1.0 Ampere and how much from 1.0 to 1.5A.
Or if I look from 0.5 to 2.0A, I can come up with a value of how much different the Vgs must be, to move from 0.5 to 2.0A.
Above it is around 3.1 Volts to give a 1.5 Ampere change.
This value tells me something about the curves of the devices.

I have done this with all my pairs, and now the big question is: What is better?
Picture A or picture B?
Picture A both sides, left and right, are the same but between N and P there is a difference.
Or like picture B, left side is perfect, only the right side is imbalanced?

With better I mean: in the context of distortion and harmonic cancellation.

This is for one channel only. The other channel has all 3.2V in all quadrants:)
Thanks to the perfectly matched VFETs from Mr. Pass :D
I will post some curves soon, unbelievable....

I hope someone can answer....
 

Attachments

  • both sides the same.jpg
    both sides the same.jpg
    212.9 KB · Views: 808
  • both sides different.jpg
    both sides different.jpg
    212.4 KB · Views: 687
Last edited:
Walter,

Thanks so much for your posts!
I'm trying to do something like what you're doing, by making my own single-sided PCBs
I'm greatly enjoying your project progress and photos.
I wanted to alert you to something discovered while tracing circuit paths and comparing Papa's schematics and PCB art with your PCB layout.
You may well have already caught it after the pictures were taken, but the trace for the shorted leads of the P1 bias-pot should go to Ground, not the trace for the single lead.
Would you please share some info and pictures regarding the Front End PCB also?
Is that PCB available for purchase somewhere, or did you design and make that one too?
Thanks.

Respectfully,
Msr. Mojo
 
Member
Joined 2012
Paid Member
I wanted to alert you to something discovered while tracing circuit paths and comparing Papa's schematics and PCB art with your PCB layout.
You may well have already caught it after the pictures were taken, but the trace for the shorted leads of the P1 bias-pot should go to Ground, not the trace for the single lead.

Hi Mojo, I saw that, but it really makes no functional difference whether they go to ground or to the TL431. You are only setting a certain resistor value. This kind of connecting is done, so you don't get hiccups when the wiper loses contact with the carbon or plastic film.

I will post some more photo's of the frontend later on, I made the PCBs myself indeed.
 
Member
Joined 2012
Paid Member
Walter in the A you have no offset....
Anyway the transistors VFETs are overwhelmed paired
Sadly....

Look at the insane matches I got from the DIYAudio store:
Especially those 4 2SJ28's .... WOW exact matches, curve traced :D
And you know how much they differ normally.

I think they are sequentially picked from the boxes and those 4 are cut from the same die.

While measuring them, I checked more than once if I was measuring the same VFET over and over again :):p

I'm a lucky guy this time....
 

Attachments

  • insane matches.jpg
    insane matches.jpg
    210.8 KB · Views: 1,156
The one and only
Joined 2001
Paid Member
Look at the insane matches I got from the DIYAudio store:

Not surprising, they were in the original flats taken in sequence, so there was
a good chance of getting the same die, and they were all tested on a
temperature regulated 50 deg heat sink and then sorted by Vgs.

Looking at large numbers of them, there is great consistency. Of the 2000
or so I tested, I had one bad one.