V/I class A Amplifier

Disabled Account
Joined 2015
892022d1605021500-class-amplifier-vi-classa-mos-jpg


This is two amplifiers combined in push pull. The main power amp is made of open loop current amplifier T4,T5. The bias is adjusted by R5, 1.3A and the transconductance by R7. The second amplifier is also a transconductance with feedback to provide a low impedance output.
This is a quick feasibility circuit of 10w, with mosfet it is about 0.05% THD and the double with bjt version.
Hayk
 

Attachments

  • VI CLASSA MOS.JPG
    VI CLASSA MOS.JPG
    123.6 KB · Views: 1,651
  • VI CLASSA.JPG
    VI CLASSA.JPG
    135.4 KB · Views: 699
Last edited:
Here how it works. With 16 ohms load, the I amp works in SE where the V amp corrects the distortion.
attachment.php

With 8 ohms load, both V&I work equally.
attachment.php

With 50 ohm load the V swallows most of the I current.
attachment.php

I must review the current amp for more linearity.
Hayk
 

Attachments

  • 16 ohm.JPG
    16 ohm.JPG
    40.5 KB · Views: 857
  • 8 ohm.JPG
    8 ohm.JPG
    45.5 KB · Views: 836
  • 50 ohm.JPG
    50 ohm.JPG
    44.2 KB · Views: 859
  • VI CLASSA MOS25.JPG
    VI CLASSA MOS25.JPG
    27 KB · Views: 89
attachment.php

This is two switchable type of biasing. If the switch is closed, the I amp delivers half of required current for 8 ohm load. The amp is full class A.
attachment.php

If the switch is open, the I amp delivers all the current to 8 ohms load up to 9W, above it cuts off but the V amp remaining in class A all time fills in the blank.
attachment.php

attachment.php

By this the same amp can have two different sounds, of course an adjust instead of switch can make it variable to tune the sound.
Hayk
 

Attachments

  • VI CLASSA MOS25.JPG
    VI CLASSA MOS25.JPG
    28 KB · Views: 769
  • max classA.JPG
    max classA.JPG
    44.2 KB · Views: 742
  • semi classA.JPG
    semi classA.JPG
    44.6 KB · Views: 735
  • classA full.JPG
    classA full.JPG
    44.6 KB · Views: 734
Last edited:
attachment.php

This is all Mosfet to have square law function. It requires only 1.15A bias for 30W 0.02% 1khz dissipating 55W. The C4 can be shorted and the bias readjusted once the value of R9 is determined.
Hayk
 

Attachments

  • VI CLASSA MOS30.JPG
    VI CLASSA MOS30.JPG
    28.5 KB · Views: 673
Last edited:
Hi Hayk,

I played a bit with your nice design and ended with this variation.
A little bit simpler and extremely stable, see square wave.
R15 sets the Bias current and R16 the output offset voltage.

Hans
 

Attachments

  • Amp1.jpg
    Amp1.jpg
    392.1 KB · Views: 246
  • Amp2.jpg
    Amp2.jpg
    233.6 KB · Views: 244
Split vs single supply

I find strange that the two versions of the same amp have very different distortion harmonic components both in amplitude and phase. Can someone explain why?

attachment.php

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • VI CLASSA MOS30.JPG
    VI CLASSA MOS30.JPG
    53.9 KB · Views: 555
  • VI CLASSA MOS25.JPG
    VI CLASSA MOS25.JPG
    52.9 KB · Views: 424
Hi Hans. Your amp is superb but not V/I. It needs thermal stability (two diodes glued upon the Nmosfet), and means to adjust the gain balance of the outputs (3.9k potentiometer instead of resistor).

Hi Hayk,

The 3k9 determines the voltage swing to the same amount for the positive and the negative MosFet, it's value has only effect on the loop gain and not on the balance of the outputs, see image below for 3K9 and 2K7.
Top graph is output voltage with below the current through the 8R resistor and both MosFets Drain currents. As you can see, it has no effect at all on balance and on Bias current.

The other thing is that although it may look a bit different, it is just as much a V/I as your design.
The lower MosFet acts as a modulated current source.
Connect R8 in your design to earth instead of to T2, and in my design disconnect C7, and both lower MosFets are constant current sources.

Now to modulate this current source in my case I take the T2's drain where I need no inverter and no gain, where you need an inverter with gain because T2's Source has a much lower voltage swing.
So both circuits are just as much V/I to my opinion.

It is just a raw design, so adding parts for thermal bias compensation would make sense.
Also adding an op-amp in front could further hit two birds with one stone.
As a servo to control the output offset voltage and at the same time by reducing the distortion substantially, and notice that R16 can be removed.
See the second image for a 1Khz 30Watt output.

Hans

P.S. I will try to spend some time hoping to understand why single and dual supply behave differently with your design.
 

Attachments

  • Amp3.jpg
    Amp3.jpg
    774.7 KB · Views: 113
  • Amp4.jpg
    Amp4.jpg
    403.8 KB · Views: 98
May be this way.
attachment.php

Or the emitter resistor to make potentiometer.
PSRR can be a problem.
By using the common inverting input transistor, you apply feedback also to the N mosfet which must remain open loop I amplfiier, this why the I amp to remain high impedance current source it needs it's own inverter. That is the I amp pours the current to the load, the V amp adjusts the distortion and Z load variations. As the V amp imposes its authority in SE, the amp behaves as SE as you see the harmonics.
Hayk
 

Attachments

  • pot.JPG
    pot.JPG
    14.1 KB · Views: 407
Last edited:
Hayk,

About thermal compensation.
The Irfp mosfets have zero temp coefficients at around 5-6 Amp and a ever increasing positive temp coeff. at a decreasing drain current.
How did you come to the two compensation diodes, was this based on experiments or just an educated guess ?

Hans
 
The u of irfp240 is higher than the 9240, 4/3.3 at 1.33A according to the spice model. To balance the gains you need only to decrease the N mosfet drive. If they are not equal, the output cannot remain in class A at full power.