Well, it is an unorthodox use of LT. However, even with LT the crossover highpass reduces excursion helpfully. Also note that typical music signal rolls off at about 3 dB/octave so much of the power won't increase excursion noticeably: 400-2000 Hz will have about as much power as 200-400, probably more once the crossover rolloff is taken into account, and WInISD will tell you the driver barely moves at those frequencies.
Plus 200W is not RMS. 200 watt load resistors are hefty beasts rated for dissipation only when mounted on a hefty heatsink, and most drivers rated for such don't have a bevy of fins on the back.
In a similar vein I mentioned using LT for vented enclosures, with considerable caution such as a highpass filter at Fb to keep cones out of my lap.
Plus 200W is not RMS. 200 watt load resistors are hefty beasts rated for dissipation only when mounted on a hefty heatsink, and most drivers rated for such don't have a bevy of fins on the back.
In a similar vein I mentioned using LT for vented enclosures, with considerable caution such as a highpass filter at Fb to keep cones out of my lap.
I've just built another DIY subwoofer containing 2x Faital Pro 18XL1800.
They'll be the 4th subwoofer in my system that's calibrated with Dirac Live Bass Control and hopefully with Dirac ART in the near future. The lower correction curtain is set to 15Hz and my need for clean infrasonic bass needs is finally satisfied.


They'll be the 4th subwoofer in my system that's calibrated with Dirac Live Bass Control and hopefully with Dirac ART in the near future. The lower correction curtain is set to 15Hz and my need for clean infrasonic bass needs is finally satisfied.
Last edited:
No ports as I want to use them for mixed HT/music.
I have considered low large tuned and read all recent posts about ports and LLT here and on AVS but I kept on simulating in WinISD with enclosure size vs tuning frequency vs port size (velocity vs first resonance) and finally decided on building sealed. Sealed indeed has less output but also none of the port problems 😉
I have considered low large tuned and read all recent posts about ports and LLT here and on AVS but I kept on simulating in WinISD with enclosure size vs tuning frequency vs port size (velocity vs first resonance) and finally decided on building sealed. Sealed indeed has less output but also none of the port problems 😉
No 130dB indeed is way too much.
For diyaudio.com, but not for avsforum.com.
https://www.avsforum.com/threads/the-tactile-response-thread-for-bass.3081780/
The bracing approach was to get a very sturdy enclosure with minimal waste and saw dust. 44mm by 44mm pine wood was used for the skeleton and plywood scrap boards were applied for the interlinks. I only used the router for the woofer cutouts.
Oh my... 😳For diyaudio.com, but not for avsforum.com.
https://www.avsforum.com/threads/the-tactile-response-thread-for-bass.3081780/
They don't play on avsforum!
Multiple 24" SUBwoofers in the home is the new standard.
Multiple 24" SUBwoofers in the home is the new standard.
Substantial in multiple ways. Worthy of the corner position in a multi-sub configuration.
I'd seriously consider 24"s if they were available and affordale in the EU. I also see SUB in capitals. I know that my set of 4x 21", 2x18" and 4x 15" (and future 4x 18") won't do much under 10Hz but all together I'm very happy with their distortion free performance in my living room 😉They don't play on avsforum!
Multiple 24" SUBwoofers in the home is the new standard.
Great box design and build. Looks very stiff and well braced. 😀
Thanks! I'm still doubting about recycling MDF leftovers to bring the wall thickness to 40mm all around though.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Subwoofers
- Useful infrasonic extension? How low do you go?