You can't really know without real testing... in a similar situation !
I stopped to read only datas, as I can make sound a dac very different jusy by playing on a 2 cm wire between a TS7a or an A123 cell and the IanClock board !
There are too much parameters to allow you to be sure the best thing on paper sounds the best at ears (at least without a very long tuning to have the best...in your own hifi).
Here you talked about 3 different layout and crystals :
- Christek 957 (or the brand new one talked above)
- Laptech (non OCXO one)
-NDK
And CLock board 2 from Ian, or ANdrea pcbs or the combo (possibility to stack a part of the ANdrea's pcbs on the Ian CLock 2 (and 1 version as well) .
What did you really benchmark at ears witch what supplies and which DAC ? Did you always test with uf-l wires to inteconnect the pcbs... and with witch crystals ?: how many layers of pcb did you have to stack to feed and take the beat of the crystals ? (I'm sure a simple dip14 socket or one layer of pcb between the crystals and the rest can be heared !)
I believe all those parameters matters !
Anyway, it's true Ian said the best sound he had was with OCXO from SUPRA (Mr Moro)....
I stopped to have definitive conclusion on a layout as when I change only a simple cap or wire, all the sound change for the best or the worst in relation to each system !
Few gears are defintly the best everywhere ! Have to say about DACs with several way to feed it, Mr Pedja Rogic AYA II stays the best I had at home :the most musical one on Classical, Jazz... and even Rock or World Music !
The Wave I/O with NDK Crystals and Simultaneous pcb from Ian sounded very good but for the moment I prefer the recloked version with Crytek 957 and FIFO and Isolator before .... subjectivly: my tastes, my hifif, my room !
I stopped to read only datas, as I can make sound a dac very different jusy by playing on a 2 cm wire between a TS7a or an A123 cell and the IanClock board !
There are too much parameters to allow you to be sure the best thing on paper sounds the best at ears (at least without a very long tuning to have the best...in your own hifi).
Here you talked about 3 different layout and crystals :
- Christek 957 (or the brand new one talked above)
- Laptech (non OCXO one)
-NDK
And CLock board 2 from Ian, or ANdrea pcbs or the combo (possibility to stack a part of the ANdrea's pcbs on the Ian CLock 2 (and 1 version as well) .
What did you really benchmark at ears witch what supplies and which DAC ? Did you always test with uf-l wires to inteconnect the pcbs... and with witch crystals ?: how many layers of pcb did you have to stack to feed and take the beat of the crystals ? (I'm sure a simple dip14 socket or one layer of pcb between the crystals and the rest can be heared !)
I believe all those parameters matters !
Anyway, it's true Ian said the best sound he had was with OCXO from SUPRA (Mr Moro)....
I stopped to have definitive conclusion on a layout as when I change only a simple cap or wire, all the sound change for the best or the worst in relation to each system !
Few gears are defintly the best everywhere ! Have to say about DACs with several way to feed it, Mr Pedja Rogic AYA II stays the best I had at home :the most musical one on Classical, Jazz... and even Rock or World Music !
The Wave I/O with NDK Crystals and Simultaneous pcb from Ian sounded very good but for the moment I prefer the recloked version with Crytek 957 and FIFO and Isolator before .... subjectivly: my tastes, my hifif, my room !
Last edited:
Has anyone tried the XU208 boards for the USB to I2S conversion?
There are three versions: Q1, X1 and F1. The first two are very affordable.
There are three versions: Q1, X1 and F1. The first two are very affordable.
Not sure I understood what you mean ?!
Probably because this isn't your first language. You have been confused from the start.
I posted earlier in the thread, I have tried and am currently using the F1. You are welcome to PM me if you like.
I've used DIYINHK CM6631A and XMOS boards, both isolated, and I prefer the XMOS.
Which Xmos board have you tried and linked to what?
Let's try to wake up this thread. Did anyone try the III version of JL sound's USB solution? And do you use the NDK clocks on board? I am looking for a very good and affordable USB to SPDIF convertor to use with my Hypex Fusion 253 plate amps...
Spec wise it looks fine I would think...
Spec wise it looks fine I would think...
Here i have tested:
Amanero
Jlsounds i2soverusb3
Ian fifo with lipo4 and crystek clocks.
Diynhk isolated 768k xmos
Hifyberry digi pro
In my subjective listenings... the best is i2soverusb3...
The worst was diynhk isolated 768k xmos..
Amanero
Jlsounds i2soverusb3
Ian fifo with lipo4 and crystek clocks.
Diynhk isolated 768k xmos
Hifyberry digi pro
In my subjective listenings... the best is i2soverusb3...
The worst was diynhk isolated 768k xmos..
Nice bump, @fedde.
I see there are three possible ways on the i2soverusb v3.
BTW, how to configure I2S for TDA1387? Same as TDA1541?
In which power configuration did you test these boards?Here i have tested:
Amanero
Jlsounds i2soverusb3
Ian fifo with lipo4 and crystek clocks.
Diynhk isolated 768k xmos
Hifyberry digi pro
In my subjective listenings... the best is i2soverusb3...
The worst was diynhk isolated 768k xmos..
I see there are three possible ways on the i2soverusb v3.
BTW, how to configure I2S for TDA1387? Same as TDA1541?
One answer: TDA1387 - settings the same as for TDA1541 in I2S mode (time multiplexed, two's complement data format). Sorry, I shouldn't ask.
Last edited:
What do you mean? Are you talking about jlsounds v.iiii?I just don't like listening to music with it.
Here i have tested:
Amanero
Jlsounds i2soverusb3
Ian fifo with lipo4 and crystek clocks.
Diynhk isolated 768k xmos
Hifyberry digi pro
In my subjective listenings... the best is i2soverusb3...
The worst was diynhk isolated 768k xmos..
Sounds promising, thank you for responding. I am also interested what supplies you use.
In the meantime, I already ordered an i2soverusb v3 to try it out. Let's hope it brings improvements in my system. The v3 manual is not so clear to me by the way. Do you need to configure all these jumpers and zero ohm resistors also for the spdif output on H2? Or is this only required to configure spdif on the other header?
Fedde
In terms of “hearing” any usb i2s is either a pass or fail - it’s digital and it the usb byte should be represented Vs clock in the correct timing graph. Or fails todo so. Regardless of how it does it.
A pc playing will run a codec translating to linear pcm or dss. OSX has all that built in so no driver for usb audio class 2.0.
So the pc codec in use can/may change the audio (codec digital filters etc).
Once the i2c hits the dac. Soekris for example then fifos the bytes again in the fgpa before sampling up to switching speed with each digital filter.
So a dac and the format to linear PCM/dss codec itself are the only thing that should change the sound if configured.
The last piece is the circuit design - how well the digital signal is transferred. Going back to my first point - the digital signal at the pins of the dac should be as per the digital timing graph (including leading edges) and the power supplies should also be dampened so that power is suppler in specification too. Then there’s noise I can see how bad circuit design impacts sound - well that’s again down to the digital signal graph and power making their way across the digital ICs isn’t the analogue domain. What about differential input dacs to reduce noise susceptibility?
So what out non usb?
I can see where dejittering would help here..
A pc playing will run a codec translating to linear pcm or dss. OSX has all that built in so no driver for usb audio class 2.0.
So the pc codec in use can/may change the audio (codec digital filters etc).
Once the i2c hits the dac. Soekris for example then fifos the bytes again in the fgpa before sampling up to switching speed with each digital filter.
So a dac and the format to linear PCM/dss codec itself are the only thing that should change the sound if configured.
The last piece is the circuit design - how well the digital signal is transferred. Going back to my first point - the digital signal at the pins of the dac should be as per the digital timing graph (including leading edges) and the power supplies should also be dampened so that power is suppler in specification too. Then there’s noise I can see how bad circuit design impacts sound - well that’s again down to the digital signal graph and power making their way across the digital ICs isn’t the analogue domain. What about differential input dacs to reduce noise susceptibility?
So what out non usb?
I can see where dejittering would help here..
Last edited:
Have you folks listened to a system assembled like this, with JLsounds boards, and compared it with a commercial product, like a Topping D50 or any other?
i tried some ps.. salas reflector, lt3035, and studer 900 ps.Nice bump, @fedde.
In which power configuration did you test these boards?
I see there are three possible ways on the i2soverusb v3.
BTW, how to configure I2S for TDA1387? Same as TDA1541?
In generaly i don t feel diference on power the usb side separated . I m using a laptop on batery..
On the clocks there is big diference..
This is my akm4497 dac with i2soverusbiii
Playing:
YouTube
Last edited:
In my subjective listenings... the best is i2soverusb3...
The worst was diynhk isolated 768k xmos..
Same here 🙂
Can you please describe the boards you assembled that system with?
@NickNuck,
Same feeling, layout drawing is a big part in the result and not that easy, high speeds are a b..ch!
What about frequency of the crystal and his phase noise in the low end, quality of gnd reference ?
I'm not understanding your inputt about diferential dac? Beyond the concept, is there an existing diy board somewhere already ?
About OSX, does the latest Windows 10 have not natively implemented the USB2 ? Still a difference with OSX ?
@everyone who tried,
How is the last JLSound board stands vs the older ones please?
Btw The Wave I/O is a little better when the non isolated outputt is chosed, and the ps chip for the spidf desoldered of the board... didn't listen to the last one customized with the improved NDK xtals by lucian... Should I jump in with the JLSound number 3 ?
Same feeling, layout drawing is a big part in the result and not that easy, high speeds are a b..ch!
What about frequency of the crystal and his phase noise in the low end, quality of gnd reference ?
I'm not understanding your inputt about diferential dac? Beyond the concept, is there an existing diy board somewhere already ?
About OSX, does the latest Windows 10 have not natively implemented the USB2 ? Still a difference with OSX ?
@everyone who tried,
How is the last JLSound board stands vs the older ones please?
Btw The Wave I/O is a little better when the non isolated outputt is chosed, and the ps chip for the spidf desoldered of the board... didn't listen to the last one customized with the improved NDK xtals by lucian... Should I jump in with the JLSound number 3 ?
hi pistollero,Here i have tested:
Amanero
Jlsounds i2soverusb3
Ian fifo with lipo4 and crystek clocks.
Diynhk isolated 768k xmos
Hifyberry digi pro
In my subjective listenings... the best is i2soverusb3...
The worst was diynhk isolated 768k xmos..
this thread is a bit old, but if i can ask... (because i am in the market for one)
what amanero version were you using and with what clocks? Amanero is now using ndk clocks for his latest models, as far as i know.
Also what sound characteristics do you look for? For some it's detail, for other it's the analog sound, etc.
i assume you were using the boards with the same supplies also....?
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Source
- USB to i2s please, which sounds best?