I’ve read his original paper some years ago, as well as a few later inspired peer papers to the limited degree that I could understand them. As I’d said, there are a number of practical issues. Which are certainly well beyond our present human technology. My point was only that relativity doesn’t prohibit faster than light velocity.
If you put the local observer, say the photon or the UFO inside the acreation circle of a black hole perhaps the gravity make it go faster than the speed of ligth ? And what is outside becomes way slower (view from the photon / UFO) which locally may solve time travel problems.
So if you can artificially bend the local space time which gravity is and bend it enough locally for a wormhole then a clever allien may travel faster than the speed of ligth seen from a straigth line distance point of view ! But I still wonder if terristrians are interressant enough to be visited ?! We are surrounded by two asteroids barreers... what a risk for a hotdog !And how to make local gravity collapse ad voluntatem ? I had success at that with wine but the distance still stays short ! But I confirm you can see stars...
So if you can artificially bend the local space time which gravity is and bend it enough locally for a wormhole then a clever allien may travel faster than the speed of ligth seen from a straigth line distance point of view ! But I still wonder if terristrians are interressant enough to be visited ?! We are surrounded by two asteroids barreers... what a risk for a hotdog !And how to make local gravity collapse ad voluntatem ? I had success at that with wine but the distance still stays short ! But I confirm you can see stars...
Last edited:
Currently sci-fi, but a Shaw-Fujikawa Translight Engine creates wormholes between normal space and an alternate plane known as slipspace.
The engine uses high-power particle accelerators to generate microscopic black holes that are manipulated to form a coherent wormhole between normal space and slipspace, allowing a ship to travel from one place to another via a different dimension. 😎
They succeeded to teleport a particle on several dozen feets in a laboratory to check the intrication principle. Problem is of course the two particles have to known each other already.
What if you put several of those travel machines not far from each other ? Could it be like a letter going trough several postal relays where you change the horse each time ?
Or simply do armies test powerful laser as images projectors to fool the plane instruments or the pilots ? (Ok do not ask me why how a radar detects an image without dopler effect)
What if you put several of those travel machines not far from each other ? Could it be like a letter going trough several postal relays where you change the horse each time ?
Or simply do armies test powerful laser as images projectors to fool the plane instruments or the pilots ? (Ok do not ask me why how a radar detects an image without dopler effect)
It appears you are referring to quantum teleportation.
"In quantum teleportation, the properties of quantum entanglement are used to send a spin state (qubit) between observers without physically moving the involved particle. The particles themselves are not really teleported, but the state of one particle is destroyed on one side and extracted on the other side, so the information that the state encodes is communicated."
Hum in the paper I read they were less explicit and talked about the intrication principle about two particles in an accelerator iirc.
So true teleportation but I dunno...it is way above my head.
What I know is then you have two bottles at the cave and climb one then the second is following in a certain time laps ...automatically.
So true teleportation but I dunno...it is way above my head.
What I know is then you have two bottles at the cave and climb one then the second is following in a certain time laps ...automatically.
I have not been able to find the term "intrication principle" in a search, diyiggy, but quantum entanglement pops up by association.
EDIT: I've found that intrication means entanglement!
EDIT: I've found that intrication means entanglement!
Last edited:
yup my french. Our language is quite specific like the german's. So entenglement it must be be. Sorry for that.
That's OK. I immediately understood from the context of your post #2,304 that "intrication" must be your word for "entanglement".
I just had to look it up to be perfectly sure! 😍
so, ok no matter teleportation ? But just information : "spin state" ? That's indeed sings very quantic... wonder how the information "travels" through the space...
My culture stops here, so very early : the spin is the movement/state of neutrons you can not know the position or the trajectory at the same time around the neucleous, so "jumping" from the point of view of the observer from a state to another. So can not argue that much in that burning bush believers comitee about UFO, but seems to me in the same idea that what is observed is not really understood and human brain works like nature hating vaccum... which is the definition of believing but not knowing. I just can wonder if there is massees manipulation as some stated but that stays in the belief camp and that moves sudenly in more food for the area 51 comitee. Some would call that today alien wokism ! But that's the same BS with new cloth for fools that are bored.
My culture stops here, so very early : the spin is the movement/state of neutrons you can not know the position or the trajectory at the same time around the neucleous, so "jumping" from the point of view of the observer from a state to another. So can not argue that much in that burning bush believers comitee about UFO, but seems to me in the same idea that what is observed is not really understood and human brain works like nature hating vaccum... which is the definition of believing but not knowing. I just can wonder if there is massees manipulation as some stated but that stays in the belief camp and that moves sudenly in more food for the area 51 comitee. Some would call that today alien wokism ! But that's the same BS with new cloth for fools that are bored.
Last edited:
I know enough about quantum mechanics to know I don't know anything about it. But I have wondered if quantum entanglement could be used for transport to destinations too far to reach in a useful time frame by more conventional means.
I suspect it would take an unrealistic amount of energy. And I wouldn't want to be out there bumping into stuff at those velocities.
Time travel is what I want to see. I have no idea if it's actually viable. Again the energy required would certainly be prohibitive.
I suspect it would take an unrealistic amount of energy. And I wouldn't want to be out there bumping into stuff at those velocities.
Time travel is what I want to see. I have no idea if it's actually viable. Again the energy required would certainly be prohibitive.
seems travelling in space is already time travel, but in a standalone direction alas ! Btw see the first episode of a TV serie called Lazarus Project... the guys can go back to a previous spin state of the Earth by making backups within the 6 month window... funny ! Sorta of Neverending story.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
High-altitude object shot down over Alaska, US says
Spokesman John Kirby said the unmanned object was "the size of a small car" and was over a sparsely populated area at the time.
President Joe Biden took the decision to shoot down the object, which was of unknown origin, Mr Kirby said.
Intelligence officials became aware of the object on Thursday evening, according to Mr Kirby. "We do not know who owns it, whether it's state owned or corporate owned or privately owned," he said.
He said a fighter jet had approached the object and assessed there was nobody onboard, and this information was available to Mr Biden when he made his decision.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64605447
In order to travel backwards in time, we may be able to harness tachyons, those hypothetical faster than light particles.
Tachyons utilise vacuum (zero-point) energy. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/follow-up-what-is-the-zer/#:~:text="Zero-point energy refers to random quantum fluctuations of,of course, even when no matter is present.
All of physical reality exists inside the "light cone" of a Minkowski spacetime diagram. https://wiki2.org/en/Minkowski_diagram
The red "worldline" represents our path through spacetime, while the sloping sides of the light cone represent the worldlines for photons travelling at the speed of light.
The region outside the light cone ("elsewhere") is inaccessible because one would have to travel faster than light to reach it.
However, a faster than light tachyon could travel through this inaccessible elsewhere region and send a signal from the future into the past.
Now, tachyon time travel may sound implausible to us, but not to the aliens from the future who are trying to communicate with us. 👽😉
Very wiser said like that for a non english speaker that read it ; of course the difference in between is fulled by the litterature, almost one century of SF .
Of course it is saying more about us than hypothetics aliens. Seems we need perpectives to bear the cruel basic reality. A powerfull instrument in the hands of people that rule it, being monks, politics, psychos... What a a sad nature we have at being able to question more than we are able to answer. That is so cruel than at seing always the moon the clever guys can miss their own finger when life is scratching. What a wonderful ruling tool than UFOs...
🙂
Of course it is saying more about us than hypothetics aliens. Seems we need perpectives to bear the cruel basic reality. A powerfull instrument in the hands of people that rule it, being monks, politics, psychos... What a a sad nature we have at being able to question more than we are able to answer. That is so cruel than at seing always the moon the clever guys can miss their own finger when life is scratching. What a wonderful ruling tool than UFOs...
🙂
Last edited:
The USAF have just shot down a UFO and ground crews are on there way to retrieve it.
It is most likely to be another giant Chinese lantern but not as big as the last one.
It is most likely to be another giant Chinese lantern but not as big as the last one.
According to Bigun's link in post #2,314, the spokesman corrected a reporter who referred to the object as a balloon.
He said the object did not appear to have the manoeuvrable capability of the Chinese balloon and seemed to be "virtually at the whim of the wind".
He said the object did not appear to have the manoeuvrable capability of the Chinese balloon and seemed to be "virtually at the whim of the wind".