What we don't receive is communication, period. Which is the evidence there's no one else out there.
So if they are communicating to each other and we don’t have the technology to pick it up, they automatically don’t exist?
wow, that was a fortunate event!, I think they’re pretty rare
Well, I haven’t seen one since. Are there any believable ball lightning videos? I saw one on YouTube awhile back, but it looked fake to me.
I saw something similar as a small child.I saw ball lightning when I was in my late teens. I was waiting for the bus on a busy street on an overcast day that later generated a thunderstorm, and saw a glowing white ball floating along the wires strung between electrical poles. It travelled along the wires for about 20 feet and then turned downward along the pole towards the ground before disappearing about midway down the pole. I turned to the gent next to me and said “What was that?”. He shook his head and said “I don’t know”. I didn’t know what it was until years later, but at the time I didn’t think it was an alien ship. It doesn’t look anything like anything solid or mechanical. It looked like a glowing ball of gas about the size of a basketball, with undefined edges.
I think they're searching for radio waves. Or at least they were at one point. Old tech to say the least....
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Well, I haven’t seen one since. Are there any believable ball lightning videos? I saw one on YouTube awhile back, but it looked fake to me.
I’ve heard credible reports. You see, I’ve always been interested in plasma physics, I did my MSc. and my PhD in plasma physics but it was a rather long time ago.
It's a necessity for communication purpose, no?Who are we to decide what constitutes a successful life form?
That's a big if.Some say we teeter on the brink of manmade catastrophe (and I don’t want to get into that discussion) that if it came to pass would make us a profoundly unsuccessful species in terms of our longevity.
I think it's more than vast majority. All but humans, maybe.The vast majority of living things on this planet are unaware they exist. It seems in humankind’s terms, that’s a burden as much as it’s a gift.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Exactly. Trying to fit something that we clearly do not understand into the framework that we do understand and not succeeding doesn’t make that thing impossible or not exist. The biggest enemies to advancement and understanding of our universe are orthodoxy and dogma. When you know that your understanding is limited and that you don’t have the entire answer, saying that something is impossible or fiction only shows what your limits are, not any real meaningful truth.
What tizman said. Plus, the evidence you are referring to is our level of evidentiary technology. Unless you know for sure that our current technical level in such field is the ultimate one in the universe, it remains as speculation.No, the speculation is whether or not what we do pick up is communication. If there's no evidence someone is out there it's the same as evidence there's no one out there.
We have no reason to think so unless there's evidence. So far the only evidence we have is that they don't. That and the improbability science reveals.So if they are communicating to each other and we don’t have the technology to pick it up, they automatically don’t exist?
I don't think they do. Do you know someone who can communicate with those animals like a translator? Or like Spock does in Star Trek (mind meld)? if you do, then it may shed some light on this matter.you don’t believe dogs are self aware? dolphins?
Um, we don’t have evidence they don’t; we don’t have evidence they do. Not an insignificant difference.
It's our current level of evidentiary technology. Remember, not long ago, we didn't have any way to observe radio signals even if it came from exoplanet. There is a chance that by the time we were able to, those signals have passed us and possibly the last broadcast before some being decided to upgrade to something else that we don't have yet.We have no reason to think so unless there's evidence. So far the only evidence we have is that they don't. That and the improbability science reveals.
We have no reason to think so unless there's evidence. So far the only evidence we have is that they don't. That and the improbability science reveals.
Prior to 1892, science didn’t know that viruses existed. Does that mean that viruses didn’t exist prior to 1892? How about a more modern example. When I was in my early 20s, I had an stomach ulcer. At that time my doctor told me my ulcer was caused by stress. Ten years later, it was a bacteria, Helicobacter pylori, that caused my ulcer. Was it always Helicobacter pylori, or was it stress initially, and then Helicobacter pylori once science discovered it?
slim to none
Chance that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe
Chance that intelligent life within 200 lightyears of earth has electromagnetic communications technology that we could detect
Chance that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe within a distance that would be reasonable to cross at near lightspeed (sort of follows from the last)
Chance that not only does intelligent life exist within our universe but it has traveled here on multiple occasions at trans-light speed and every government on the earth has successfully conspired to keep it a secret from everyone except a few crazy people on YouTube.
Chance that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe
Chance that intelligent life within 200 lightyears of earth has electromagnetic communications technology that we could detect
Chance that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe within a distance that would be reasonable to cross at near lightspeed (sort of follows from the last)
Chance that not only does intelligent life exist within our universe but it has traveled here on multiple occasions at trans-light speed and every government on the earth has successfully conspired to keep it a secret from everyone except a few crazy people on YouTube.
Can't say I disagree with the last 3 assertions.
Not so sure about the first, although it seems exceedingly unlikely that we (as a species) will ever know, either way.
Not so sure about the first, although it seems exceedingly unlikely that we (as a species) will ever know, either way.
re: bending space time for FLT travel
Seems to me that light that also passed through that temporary "door" would be detectable. The source would appear further, then nearer, then back to further again.
Seems to me that light that also passed through that temporary "door" would be detectable. The source would appear further, then nearer, then back to further again.
Chance that not only does intelligent life exist within our universe but it has traveled here on multiple occasions at trans-light speed and every government on the earth has successfully conspired to keep it a secret from everyone except a few crazy people on YouTube.
You’re working backwards from a conclusion. I could just as easily claim that such things do exist and the conspiracy to keep it silent has failed, as exhibited by government folk and the astronomers who testify to that assertion.
slim to none
Chance that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe
Chance that intelligent life within 200 lightyears of earth has electromagnetic communications technology that we could detect
Chance that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe within a distance that would be reasonable to cross at near lightspeed (sort of follows from the last)
Chance that not only does intelligent life exist within our universe but it has traveled here on multiple occasions at trans-light speed and every government on the earth has successfully conspired to keep it a secret from everyone except a few crazy people on YouTube.
There is no chance that any alien is visiting us if they are travelling below light speed.
There is little chance that, if they are travelling faster than light speed, we would be able to receive the sort of communications that they would need to be using in order to communicate with each other.
This is another example of applying what we currently understand as though it is all we will ever understand. See post number 633. It doesn't prove they exist, and it doesn't prove that they don't exist.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
I don't think they do. Do you know someone who can communicate with those animals like a translator? Or like Spock does in Star Trek (mind meld)? if you do, then it may shed some light on this matter.
well, there are examples of human - ape interaction using human sign language which is accepted as a fair alternative to speech when used between humans. I believe there’s a case of an ape teaching another ape this sign language. Apes share a lot of DNA with humans and I’m willing to accept the assertion that such apes are self aware. Are you?
As to how far can that be extended to other animals I don’t know, but once you accept a non-human can be self aware the door is open.
Last edited:
That assumes they are communicating with someone not aboard their own vehicle, doesn't it?There is little chance that, if they are travelling faster than light speed, we would be able to receive the sort of communications that they would need to be using in order to communicate with each other.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- UFO's- Please help me process