UFO's- Please help me process

Status
Not open for further replies.
No worries, the believers won't bother to view anything like this. This is another version of the "blinking" out of focus triangle. I never realized that some amateur astronomer identified the star pattern in the background and the several other triangles that were actually out of focus bright stars. This guy covered this from every angle.

Am I wrong in assuming this video is from more highly trained navy observers?

A few points:

1) this is one of the most widely distributed debunking videos in the UFO community right now (it is the second or third time it has been linked to in this thread). Plenty “believers” have seen these videos which have been going around for months now.

2) as a “believer” I find mick west’s work valuable; I follow him on Twitter and we have polite interactions. The “believers” are not some monolithic entity.

3) yes, you are wrong in assuming these videos originate as some sort of record of UFO flight. These videos did originate from within the US military and their authenticity has been made official, however, the officials would not speak to what was being presented in those clips. So what to make of it? Probably some military disinfo being fed to a press (via unscrupulous networks within ufo community) who have long since forgotten how to do investigative work.

In short, these videos have the same stink as everything else attached to TTSA. This has been the sentiment for a large segment of “believers” who’ve followed this topic for a long while.
 
Last edited:
The debunk vid seems to concentrate on the speed of the object. One piece of information we don't have is the heat signature of the object. If it were some mere drone or some conventional flying object, there would have been obvious sign of flying surface such as wings, or some type of propulsion from the infrared data. Neither can be seen.
The actual clip is like 10min. long but the release version is only about 1min. long. Nobody knows the whole story. The debunk website made some speculations that not sure are true.

I don't think the debunk website has all the fact and their findings can not be conclusive.
 
If it wasn't for that catastrophic event 65 million years ago on earth, we may have reached the space faring technology 1 million years sooner. Then we could have been the news of unidentified flying objects on other planets that we seeded. Just thinking out loud... :scratch2:

Perhaps the dinosaurs would have continued ruling the Earth. They had already been around 160 million years and not evolved into anything like an advanced intelligent species so I question we would be a million years ahead of where we are now.

This is exactly the kind of thing that points to how rare advanced civilizations are. Throughout the earths history there have been many cataclysms - we are just lucky life squeezed through and here we are. During the first 3 billion there were lots of crises that nearly wiped out life - acidic oceans, GRB’s, oxygen crises ( in our favor but wiped out the Cyanobacteria), asteroid impacts etc.
 
Last edited:

"Why did more complex life evolve in the first place, and a long varied progression of it at that, spanning, viruses to human beings?"


My point was that life has steadily progressed, spanning (I'm not suggesting the two form a linear chain of evolution directly between them) the most simple (viruses), to the highly complex (human beings). Including, a great diversity of complex life forms between the two along the way. So, it would seem that complex life readily evolves from more simple forms, even when those simple forms are themselves highly successfully in their own replication.

It was not at all steady. When multicellular life came about we had what is called the 'Cambrian Explosion' during which multicellular life evolved into many different shapes very rapidly. The vast majority of which equally rapidly disappeared again.

I wouldn't call it readily either considering the previous >3.2billion years of relative stagnation.
 
If it wasn't for that catastrophic event 65 million years ago on earth, we may have reached the space faring technology 1 million years sooner. Then we could have been the news of unidentified flying objects on other planets that we seeded. Just thinking out loud... :scratch2:

That catastrophic event did not just kill the dinosaurs. It killed practically ever life form over 25kg in body weight including early mammals.
The only larger ones that did survive on land (more or less) were ones which could do without food for extended periods of time so basically crocodiles and turtles/tortoises.

All larger forms of life can be traced back to the Cambrian Explosion including mammals. Had it not been for the catastrophe mammals probably would have never got the chance to dominate global life as they do now and would still be limited to tiny shrew-like creatures as they were during the age of the dinosaurs.
 
There are missing links for fish to mammal found? 😱 And what other multicellular missing links?

So called 'missing links' are largely a red herring.

But there are a number of creatures which have traits from different groups that live right now.

The duck-billed platypus is an egg-laying mammal with reptilian traits.

Lungfish and mudskippers are fish with amphibious traits. Swim bladders of modern bony fish evolved from primitive lungs.

The Portuguese Man'o'war 'jellyfish' could be considered somewhere between single cell and multicell organisms.

There is even one that straddles plants and animals. It starts of as an animal eating other single cell organisms until it comes across blue-green algae which it swallows but not digests. Ones it has those within it's body it behaves like other green algae plants and seeks sunlight instead of active hunting.
 
So called 'missing links' are largely a red herring.

But there are a number of creatures which have traits from different groups that live right now.

The duck-billed platypus is an egg-laying mammal with reptilian traits.

Lungfish and mudskippers are fish with amphibious traits. Swim bladders of modern bony fish evolved from primitive lungs.

The Portuguese Man'o'war 'jellyfish' could be considered somewhere between single cell and multicell organisms.

There is even one that straddles plants and animals. It starts of as an animal eating other single cell organisms until it comes across blue-green algae which it swallows but not digests. Ones it has those within it's body it behaves like other green algae plants and seeks sunlight instead of active hunting.
So where is proof in the fossil record we're not aliens from another planet? Why is the fossil record so incomplete when it comes to establishing long term evolution. Where are all the fossils? I mean the transitionary ones.
 
if we came here as aliens, how did that happen, why did none of the technology required show up back then ?
If we did, (and I don't believe it), it stands to reason we would have had the insight to anticipate this very controversy and make sure we left no trace so it appears we are indigenous. That way we'd have no indifference to the planet and be inclined to take care of it. However that notion may well prove untenable. Why we'd have no history/recollection of the event could be because the 1st gens were sworn to secrecy. You know, like the moon landing astronauts are keeping silent about the truth. :whazzat:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.