Even individuals that are very talented have areas of ignorance and prejudice. Elon is not an exception. Most of the blurry pictures of UFO's are because they are photographed in the atmosphere. The evidence is very strong that the magnetic fields generated by UFOs create ionization of molecules in the air, (oxygen, nitrogen, CO2) by those extremely strong magnetic fields. Those molecules absorb energy as they become polarized with the direction of the magnetic field that is being generated. They then emit photons as the ship pass through and those air molecules relax back to more of a random pattern. This creates the glowing haze around them. Another bit of evidence for that is that there are pictures from space of flying disks. Those photographs can be extremely sharp because there is no air to ionize.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
You are just a troll on this subject. You probably aren't even aware of it because your mind is so closed. When you contribute something scientifically useful I'll change my mind. I'm waiting.🙄
Your explanation belongs in the realm of science fiction. There's been a ongoing discussion about these US Military videos on UFO's in the other thread on UFO's
These UFO's videos from the US military have been debunked:
here is a link explaining and analysing the US Navy Videos
Here is another explaining and debunking the pyramid UFO video
Explaining UFO Parallax Illusion
Go Fast UFO video debunked
Debunk of the GIMBAL Video of U.S. Navy Jet Encounter with Unknown Object
Thank you for your excellent posts here on this topic, Eric.
Unfortunately there will always be people cannot resist the urge to crack jokes about this topic.
Unfortunately there will always be people cannot resist the urge to crack jokes about this topic.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
please, Mr. open mind, explain how a magnetic field ionizes a gas molecule ? because inquiring minds are curious about this new phenomena in the realms of science
I am open for a scientific discussion on this topic, having studied ionized gasses (due to electric fields) under the late Prof. von Engel.
Last edited:
Without clicking any of the links I’m assuming they are all Mick West and that I’ve seen them all before.
With all due respect, this phenomenon is much bigger and goes much further back than these declassified military releases that many in the field are suspect of.
There's no evidence for the existence of Extraterrestrial Alien UFO's......period. Its only perpetuated by conspiracy theorists.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
my offer is open to you too, just let me know how this new science works please if you expect to be taken seriously at all...
You are absolutely talking out of your hat.
First lesson, UFOs =/= extraterrestrial. People often don’t realize this out of ignorance of the subject or they are being disingenuous in discussing it.
Homework: maybe acquaint yourself with Allen Hynek or watch a film like the recently-released The Phenomenon.
Lol, look at you.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Let's get to the basis of what would allow a craft to move through space, air, and water at phenomenal speeds, turn on a dime, and and accelerate at unheard of rates. It is generally understood that 99% of visible matter is made from protons and neutrons, with the remaining 1% or so coming from electrons. Those protons and neutrons in turn are comprised of 3 quarks each that are bound together by the strong force. No quark has ever been observed in isolation. And no proton has ever been observed to decay. In fact the strong force binding them together becomes ever stronger the farther apart and faster those quarks move.
In an MRI machine there is a cryogenically controlled magnetic field that is so strong that it polarizes the nucleons in the human body. In other words, the spin planes of the nucleons all become uniform in one direction in alignment with the magnetic field. This is theoretically what occurs in a disk that has a magnetic field generated by rotating charge at the perimeter of the disk. Just as lines of force will curl around any moving charge lines of force will also curl around this rotating charge on the perimeter of the disk. This will align all the spin planes of the protons and neutrons in a direction that is perpendicular to the disk. If you then emit a thrusting force concentric with the axis of the spinning charge on the periphery that thrust will be perpendicular to the spin planes of the nucleons.
The interesting thing is that photons, which have no mass, always have their spin orientation perpendicular to their acceleration. That is why they always move at the speed of light. That's what these UFOs are doing. They are orienting their spin planes like photons do. They simultaneously provide acceleration via traditional thrust with a vector axial thrust perpendicular to the disk and they experience no inertia. Everyone within the disk will also experience no inertia because they also are treated as photons as far as their spin orientation is concerned.
I can anticipate everyone complaining that this would be too much of a free lunch. I've anticipated that. You'll just have to read that interview I linked to to understand. If you won't even expend that amount of work to understand a difficult subject then I can't have an intelligent conversation with you.
In an MRI machine there is a cryogenically controlled magnetic field that is so strong that it polarizes the nucleons in the human body. In other words, the spin planes of the nucleons all become uniform in one direction in alignment with the magnetic field. This is theoretically what occurs in a disk that has a magnetic field generated by rotating charge at the perimeter of the disk. Just as lines of force will curl around any moving charge lines of force will also curl around this rotating charge on the perimeter of the disk. This will align all the spin planes of the protons and neutrons in a direction that is perpendicular to the disk. If you then emit a thrusting force concentric with the axis of the spinning charge on the periphery that thrust will be perpendicular to the spin planes of the nucleons.
The interesting thing is that photons, which have no mass, always have their spin orientation perpendicular to their acceleration. That is why they always move at the speed of light. That's what these UFOs are doing. They are orienting their spin planes like photons do. They simultaneously provide acceleration via traditional thrust with a vector axial thrust perpendicular to the disk and they experience no inertia. Everyone within the disk will also experience no inertia because they also are treated as photons as far as their spin orientation is concerned.
I can anticipate everyone complaining that this would be too much of a free lunch. I've anticipated that. You'll just have to read that interview I linked to to understand. If you won't even expend that amount of work to understand a difficult subject then I can't have an intelligent conversation with you.
Last edited:
When I first saw the Go Fast vid more than a year ago, actually the speed was the least remarkable. What remarkable was that at the initial of the vid, the object appears to be travelling beneath the water. You could clearly see the vague outline image somewhat out of focus and the radar was not able to lock onto it. If you pause the vid, from say 5sec up to 10sec, there are frame in which you could not see the object, as if it was completely under the water.
At about 10sec mark, the object seems to suddenly became in focused, and appears on the foreground, like on top of the water, as if it emerged from the water, and at that point, the radar was able to get a lock on the image. From that point on, every frame would have it at the foreground on top of the water.
Also it's not the parallax affect, because at the beginning, the camera was in still and not panning, and you could clearly see that. It's the object that was moving.
But if the entire time of the vid the object was above the water then I agree there's nothing unique about this vid.
Last edited:
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
exerc, the first two paragraphs were starting to make sense but the third reads as nonesense. The orienting of magnetic moments of atomic nuclei in a magnetic field has not been known to eliminate inertia, even taking your example of an MRI machine I can’t say I noticed my inertia being reduced by one!
You associate inertial mass with having a direction of spin, something that has no basis in the observed laws of physics.
This theory requires belief in unproven laws of nature, in contradiction to all existing evidence.
You associate inertial mass with having a direction of spin, something that has no basis in the observed laws of physics.
This theory requires belief in unproven laws of nature, in contradiction to all existing evidence.
Last edited:
You're jumping to the immediate conclusion that everything unidentified is a alien piloting a flying saucer, when the most plausible and rational explanation is something more mundane like a bird, weather balloon or just another aircraft.
If you are not willing to put in effort to learn something new why would you expect to understand a new concept. Read my interview with Tim Ventura and then get back to me. Otherwise just shove off!
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
I'm open to learning new concepts, you just haven’t explained one to me yet which is based on clear scientific principle, or has repeatable test results - I will go and read your links...
Last edited:
You're also jumping to the conclusion that anything from debunk website means it's accurate without questioning.
Okay, so we circle back to the beginning, the reporting of UFO's has been rationally explained as either nature, man made object like a weather balloon, aircraft or a artifact of a radar or targeting system, pilot misjudgement or in some cases it's "we don't know because we don't know" due to insufficient evidence to make a determination, so technically it's classified as unidentified.......but there's zero evidence of little green aliens.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.