pheonix358 said:
Truck full of tools on 200km+++ round trip (or more) to random sites in all weather conditions isn't easily handled with an electric bike...I think I'll stick with the more expensive way, for now. 🙂
dave_gerecke said:
Awww, c'mon John, where's your sense of adventure!
😉
Peace,
Dave
Aw, come on mate, wheres ya spirit gone, ya need a extension cord or two or a hundred. The yanks run aircraft carriers on electricity, pinch one of their mobile reactors, make a little trailer, tow it behind ya. She'll be right mate.
Terry
It's foot-power to save the environment! Hurray!
"From the town of Bedrock,
They're a page right out of history....
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
"From the town of Bedrock,
They're a page right out of history....
MJL21193 said:
Yea, tried that, couldn't get it approved. They said we may get our foot caught. Not safe! They crash tested one i'd built and at high speed the splinters were lethal.
Terry
I just read something funny. The voice of Wilma Flintstone took a lump sum $15,000 in lieu of residuals for her role in the show.
scott wurcer said:
That was a great deal of money back then! Back then fish and chips with a coke was only 10c. Maybe she wanted to buy a house!
pheonix358 said:
That was her quote, "I own a house in San Clemente rather than owning San Clemente"
taze your granny -
First there was the college student who gave the language the immortal phrase “Don’t Tase me, bro!” before being zapped by police. Now, there’s the 72-year-old great-grandmother who told a cop, “Go ahead. Tase me” — and got what she asked for.
Kathryn Winkfein was stopped for doing 60 mph in a 45 zone in her pickup truck on a highway near Austin, Texas. After Deputy Chris Bieze finished writing the ticket, he gave it to her and asked her to sign it.
Winkfein refused. Bieze insisted, saying he would have to arrest her if she didn’t sign the ticket. When she wouldn’t sign, he opened the door to the truck and told her to get out.
Differing accounts
This all happened around 2 p.m. on May 11. But it didn’t become news until Winkfein told a local television station that she had been mistreated. The Travis County Constable’s Office alleged that she had been argumentative and profane. She denied the charge, telling a local Fox News reporter, “I was not argumentative. I was not combative. Every bit of this is a lie.”
In response, the constable’s office released the dashboard video of the arrest, which shows Winkfein using vulgar language and daring Bieze to use his Taser. According to the time stamp on the dashboard video, it was at least seven minutes from when Bieze told the elderly woman to get out of her truck until he finally hit her with 50,000 volts of low-amperage electricity and she fell screaming to the ground.
Winkfein has not commented since the video was released. According to the local Fox station, she has hired an attorney.
When Bieze tells her to get out of her truck, Winkfein says, “Take me to jail. Go on and take me to jail.”
“Step on out,” the officer commands.
The woman gets out of the truck and walks along the side of the road, close to the fog line separating the shoulder from the traffic lane.
“Give me the [expletive] thing and I’ll sign it,” she tells Bieze, but the officer has already told her she is being arrested. When Winkfein strays close to the traffic lane, the officer pushes her onto the shoulder.
“You’re gonna shove a 72-year-old woman?” Winkfein yells at him.
“If you don’t step back, you’re gonna be Tased,” Bieze says.
That’s when Winkfein said, “Go ahead. Tase me.”
‘I dare you’
Even then, Bieze did not use the Taser he had out and ready. He attempted to grab her, but Winkfein twisted away.
“Step back or you’re gonna be Tased, ma’am,” Bieze says again.
“I dare you,” she said.
Winkfein then decided she was leaving and tried to walk back to her truck.
“I’m getting back in my car,” she said.
“You’re gonna be Tased,” Bieze said, blocking her path.
“I’m getting back in my car,” she insists.
“No, ma’am,” he says.
when he finally fired the Taser and Winkfein went down screaming.
“Now put your hands behind your back!” Bieze orders the woman, who has fallen out of the picture. “Put your hands behind your back, or you’re gonna be Tased again!”
Bieze finally took Winkfein into custody and charged her with resisting arrest.
Sgt. Maj. Gary Griffin of the Travis County, Texas, Constable’s Office told NBC News that Bieze acted appropriately.
“He mitigated this event safely, effectively and efficiently. Nobody sustained any injury,” Griffin said.
video link -
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/31202947#31202947
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/31202935/?GT1=43001
20195
First there was the college student who gave the language the immortal phrase “Don’t Tase me, bro!” before being zapped by police. Now, there’s the 72-year-old great-grandmother who told a cop, “Go ahead. Tase me” — and got what she asked for.
Kathryn Winkfein was stopped for doing 60 mph in a 45 zone in her pickup truck on a highway near Austin, Texas. After Deputy Chris Bieze finished writing the ticket, he gave it to her and asked her to sign it.
Winkfein refused. Bieze insisted, saying he would have to arrest her if she didn’t sign the ticket. When she wouldn’t sign, he opened the door to the truck and told her to get out.
Differing accounts
This all happened around 2 p.m. on May 11. But it didn’t become news until Winkfein told a local television station that she had been mistreated. The Travis County Constable’s Office alleged that she had been argumentative and profane. She denied the charge, telling a local Fox News reporter, “I was not argumentative. I was not combative. Every bit of this is a lie.”
In response, the constable’s office released the dashboard video of the arrest, which shows Winkfein using vulgar language and daring Bieze to use his Taser. According to the time stamp on the dashboard video, it was at least seven minutes from when Bieze told the elderly woman to get out of her truck until he finally hit her with 50,000 volts of low-amperage electricity and she fell screaming to the ground.
Winkfein has not commented since the video was released. According to the local Fox station, she has hired an attorney.
When Bieze tells her to get out of her truck, Winkfein says, “Take me to jail. Go on and take me to jail.”
“Step on out,” the officer commands.
The woman gets out of the truck and walks along the side of the road, close to the fog line separating the shoulder from the traffic lane.
“Give me the [expletive] thing and I’ll sign it,” she tells Bieze, but the officer has already told her she is being arrested. When Winkfein strays close to the traffic lane, the officer pushes her onto the shoulder.
“You’re gonna shove a 72-year-old woman?” Winkfein yells at him.
“If you don’t step back, you’re gonna be Tased,” Bieze says.
That’s when Winkfein said, “Go ahead. Tase me.”
‘I dare you’
Even then, Bieze did not use the Taser he had out and ready. He attempted to grab her, but Winkfein twisted away.
“Step back or you’re gonna be Tased, ma’am,” Bieze says again.
“I dare you,” she said.
Winkfein then decided she was leaving and tried to walk back to her truck.
“I’m getting back in my car,” she said.
“You’re gonna be Tased,” Bieze said, blocking her path.
“I’m getting back in my car,” she insists.
“No, ma’am,” he says.
when he finally fired the Taser and Winkfein went down screaming.
“Now put your hands behind your back!” Bieze orders the woman, who has fallen out of the picture. “Put your hands behind your back, or you’re gonna be Tased again!”
Bieze finally took Winkfein into custody and charged her with resisting arrest.
Sgt. Maj. Gary Griffin of the Travis County, Texas, Constable’s Office told NBC News that Bieze acted appropriately.
“He mitigated this event safely, effectively and efficiently. Nobody sustained any injury,” Griffin said.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
video link -
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/31202947#31202947
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/31202935/?GT1=43001
20195
SY said:
heres a 'New Old Stock', pic, of an antique,
to celebrate
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Electric universe.
Spin, oscillation, polarization, Heisenberg. Maxwell's original 20 equations in 20 unknowns.
Thus, not vector sums (Heaviside and Lorentz) but full rotational vortexes, with a very minute total sum vortex, but NEVER forget the original Maxwellian vortex motion, with the slight final unidirectional offset. NO SYMMETRY. It is critical to understand that Maxwell's original math had and has full rotational motion with a unidirectional offset
Throw Heaviside and Loeretz in the trash bin, go back to Maxwell's original vortex math---and all will become clear.
The theory of Peter Lynds shows the same aspects.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Lynds
Thus, Schauberger, Reich, E.T. Whittaker, Gustave Le Bon, Hammel, Hutchison, Tesla, Rig Veda (mercury Torus for anti-gravity in 12,000 year old Hindu texts), Searl, Brown, Heisenberg, Dan Burisch (stargate reports out of area 51), reported UFO effects and artifacts noted by observers, Alchemy, etc, etc, etc..all had it right.
Current and Voltage (polarization-alignment) (combined with frequential oscillation) are the the signature of the prime movers..and gravity, time, energy, space, magnetism, etc..are all secondary effects.
Ie, 2 dimensional stress fields with infinite amplitude in interaction with one another, Which is Maxwell's vortex math as it was originally produced..not the known examples of 4 equations with is simple vectoral summing (minus Maxwell's critical aspect of spiral motion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) as edited by Heaviside and Lorentz into false vector sum with symmetry.
Throw out Heaviside and Lorentz and then you will find the rest.
Spin, oscillation, polarization, Heisenberg. Maxwell's original 20 equations in 20 unknowns.
Thus, not vector sums (Heaviside and Lorentz) but full rotational vortexes, with a very minute total sum vortex, but NEVER forget the original Maxwellian vortex motion, with the slight final unidirectional offset. NO SYMMETRY. It is critical to understand that Maxwell's original math had and has full rotational motion with a unidirectional offset
Throw Heaviside and Loeretz in the trash bin, go back to Maxwell's original vortex math---and all will become clear.
The theory of Peter Lynds shows the same aspects.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Lynds
Thus, Schauberger, Reich, E.T. Whittaker, Gustave Le Bon, Hammel, Hutchison, Tesla, Rig Veda (mercury Torus for anti-gravity in 12,000 year old Hindu texts), Searl, Brown, Heisenberg, Dan Burisch (stargate reports out of area 51), reported UFO effects and artifacts noted by observers, Alchemy, etc, etc, etc..all had it right.
Current and Voltage (polarization-alignment) (combined with frequential oscillation) are the the signature of the prime movers..and gravity, time, energy, space, magnetism, etc..are all secondary effects.
Ie, 2 dimensional stress fields with infinite amplitude in interaction with one another, Which is Maxwell's vortex math as it was originally produced..not the known examples of 4 equations with is simple vectoral summing (minus Maxwell's critical aspect of spiral motion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) as edited by Heaviside and Lorentz into false vector sum with symmetry.
Throw out Heaviside and Lorentz and then you will find the rest.
I see you are alive and well. No doubt fighting off office ninjas as I write...
Unfortunately I lack the background to understand what you're talking about except that vortexes are apparently very important than we think...?
I've done some of my own work though after realizing that Ohm's law can be applied not only to electrons but to tangible physics as well (it all makes sense now! Lol...).
Potential would be considered voltage, and current would be considered motion (you call this alignment).
After charting out all the Ohm's Law equations in this manner, I think it would follow that change=motion^2 (or any exponent for that matter).
Similarly, stasis=potential^2, where untapped potential begins to freeze further. (perhaps stasis could also be defined as sqrt(motion)?)
So what would be the physical equivalent to an inductor? Anything with mass, because inductance parallels inertia. Humans exhibit much inductance, as it is the resistance to a change. The side-effect of this would theoretically be that once we build up momentum, we are hard to stop!
What I can't figure out is the physical equivalent to a capacitor... I like to say it's elasticity. A friend pointed it out to me what a water tower is... Still doesn't seem to fit though.
So, not only do Ohm's laws of conservation of energy apply to physics, but the cyclical laws of capacitors and inductors as well. This means that there are physical equivalents to any electronics circuit consisting of passive components.
<Insert something witty here>
- keantoken
Unfortunately I lack the background to understand what you're talking about except that vortexes are apparently very important than we think...?
I've done some of my own work though after realizing that Ohm's law can be applied not only to electrons but to tangible physics as well (it all makes sense now! Lol...).
Potential would be considered voltage, and current would be considered motion (you call this alignment).
After charting out all the Ohm's Law equations in this manner, I think it would follow that change=motion^2 (or any exponent for that matter).
Similarly, stasis=potential^2, where untapped potential begins to freeze further. (perhaps stasis could also be defined as sqrt(motion)?)
So what would be the physical equivalent to an inductor? Anything with mass, because inductance parallels inertia. Humans exhibit much inductance, as it is the resistance to a change. The side-effect of this would theoretically be that once we build up momentum, we are hard to stop!
What I can't figure out is the physical equivalent to a capacitor... I like to say it's elasticity. A friend pointed it out to me what a water tower is... Still doesn't seem to fit though.
So, not only do Ohm's laws of conservation of energy apply to physics, but the cyclical laws of capacitors and inductors as well. This means that there are physical equivalents to any electronics circuit consisting of passive components.
<Insert something witty here>
- keantoken
So does Ken.
If the idea of analogy appeals to you, there is a superb book by actual physicists who actually understand this stuff, "Similarities in Physics, " Shive and Weber. It's out of print, but any decent university library will have it. In this excellent and well-written volume, the similarity in the working equations between diffusion processes, mechanics, and electricity are discussed in detail.
The difference here is that their approach gives you working equations and models with which you can calculate things in the real world, rather than meaningless jargon.
Aren't the oldest Hindu texts less than 4000 years old? To which "Hindu text" are you referring?
John
6000-7000 yrs would be max for even precursors to Hinduism. My favorite story is the one where the Rigveda was used as prior art in a drug patent lawsuit. Apparently the prior use was clearly documented and the drug company lost (yes!) 