Another man who is likely going to die..or completely disappear:
Napoleon, Ohio’s Doug Pelmear claims that he has created a V8-powered 1987 Ford Mustang that develops 400 horsepower and 500 lb-ft of torque on E85, can accelerate from 0-60 in about three seconds – on its way to a top speed of 180 mph – and still returns an astonishing 110 mpg.
http://www.leftlanenews.com/best-me...roduce-400-horsepower-and-return-110-mpg.html
Like I said..as many as one a day appears now, and as low as a few per week.
It's getting more and more impossible to put a cap on it.
Napoleon, Ohio’s Doug Pelmear claims that he has created a V8-powered 1987 Ford Mustang that develops 400 horsepower and 500 lb-ft of torque on E85, can accelerate from 0-60 in about three seconds – on its way to a top speed of 180 mph – and still returns an astonishing 110 mpg.
http://www.leftlanenews.com/best-me...roduce-400-horsepower-and-return-110-mpg.html
Like I said..as many as one a day appears now, and as low as a few per week.
It's getting more and more impossible to put a cap on it.
jlsem said:
>Mythbusted:none of the devices they tested made the car more >fuel efficient. The EPA has tested 104 of these devices, and only >7 showed improvement in fuel efficiency. However, none of >these improved efficiency over 6%.
I guess you can kiss that $700 goodbye.
Here's one for yah:
After over 60 years of painstaking research, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle said, "Every materialist, as I can now clearly see, is a case of arrested development."
After over 60 years of painstaking research, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle said, "Every materialist, as I can now clearly see, is a case of arrested development."
scott wurcer said:
The head of the EPA was the 'alligator shirt' dirtbag who was rewarded that position by Bush for breaking up the 2000 election recount in Florida. Zero qualifications for the job -other than that. Or was that the guy who runs the FDA? No matter. The same kind of filth has been put in that office as well...and it has trickled down and infected the integrity of that branch, just as it has the FDA. Yes, I know this from folks -directly- who work as mid level heads, in one of those branches. Which (branch), I'll have to leave alone, as those folks don't want to be singled out. The best have been forced out, long ago, as in 5 years ago or so, maybe more.
So no, I don't put much truck in the EPA. Do I think they are full of it, in the specific case and sense? No. But I wouldn't trust them with a dead rat. Their motives are incredibly suspect, at best.
That quote was actually from the "Mythbusters". I suppose these guys could just be more establishment lackeys. They could not get the thing to work. They couldn't get the "brown out' effect to work either, no dirty diapers.
The Japanese Hokkaido University Plasma electrolysis experiment has achieved mind boggling results. As per their conclusions: 'current efficiency' is 8000% to the input.
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/plasmaelectrolysis.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hokkaido_University
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/plasmaelectrolysis.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hokkaido_University
Randall Mills may disappear next, given the number of people he's defrauded. That ought to be worth at least 10,000 words and 25 links from you.
SY said:
Maybe you can explain patent no. 7188033 to me. These folks are amazing, 11 pages of references including "The Village Voice".
Tom Valone strikes again.
I suppose that if you're just patenting computer simulations, you're less likely to have your patents re-examined and withdrawn.
I suppose that if you're just patenting computer simulations, you're less likely to have your patents re-examined and withdrawn.
KBK, a little source checking (from the abstact of the Japanese paper).
< We have observed as much as 80 times more hydrogen generated by plasma electrolysis than by conventional electrolysis at 300 V.
These guys are trying to make hydrogen, trendy these days.
JL Naudin (a usual suspect) cuts a graph out of their paper and claims it shows power generation (80x = 8000%). And proceeds to set up another of his goofy (life threatening) experiments. This is how these people operate.
< We have observed as much as 80 times more hydrogen generated by plasma electrolysis than by conventional electrolysis at 300 V.
These guys are trying to make hydrogen, trendy these days.
JL Naudin (a usual suspect) cuts a graph out of their paper and claims it shows power generation (80x = 8000%). And proceeds to set up another of his goofy (life threatening) experiments. This is how these people operate.
Scott, it is the 'goofy' people (like Jack Bybee and me) who make breakthroughs. Corporate types just get cynical over time. 
What's the matter miss me?
Don't put yourself in with Naudin unless you check out some of his stuff. He claims he made a vacuum chamber with six 3'x3' pieces of plexiglass and aquarium cement. He has disclaimers but some of his "experiments" really are life threatening and you can ride an 18 wheeler through the holes in his logic.
Don't put yourself in with Naudin unless you check out some of his stuff. He claims he made a vacuum chamber with six 3'x3' pieces of plexiglass and aquarium cement. He has disclaimers but some of his "experiments" really are life threatening and you can ride an 18 wheeler through the holes in his logic.
If you keep your mind that open, you ought to check out those nice fellows from Nigeria who need some help getting $20MM out of the country.
There is an amazing collection of goofy ideas here:
http://rexresearch.com/
I love reading that stuff. 😀
ZAP
http://rexresearch.com/
I love reading that stuff. 😀
ZAP
I consider myself very open minded. I work every day on applications with CAT scanners, PET scanners, oil finding. All with incredible 2 and 3 dimentional imaging. And you know what I have never come across once is a competivive advantage via a "tweek" and they all use lots of ferrite isolators, RN55 resistors, and IC's (thank God😉).
For folks to keep harping on some "unmeasurable by any known technology" aspect of two time varying voltages has gotten tiresome.
So I will no longer participate in these types of discussions. If you and Mr. Bybee or Charles Hansen want to invite me to your site for a demo, fine. I've asked others
For folks to keep harping on some "unmeasurable by any known technology" aspect of two time varying voltages has gotten tiresome.
So I will no longer participate in these types of discussions. If you and Mr. Bybee or Charles Hansen want to invite me to your site for a demo, fine. I've asked others