Threadjacking

Once upon a time, before time.

Our whole universe was a singularity.

You, me, our amps, the creepy guy on the corner, we were all one tiny oneness.

But by the force of nature, nothing regardless of scale escapes the rules that applies to everything and everyone else, and so we find ourselves drifting furter and furter appart along with all the heavenly bodies.

I suppose the main reason we get down at times and why the world can be such a crap place. Is because it would be so very easy for everything to be so very much better. So very much nicer if everyone always did the right thing, we are so close, yet we are moveing away so quicly, we can't grab on to slow down for fear of ripping our arms off.

The most significant question I guess is; why does the universe go through the trouble of existing.
 
Nordic said:
Once upon a time, before time.

Our whole universe was a singularity.

You, me, our amps, the creepy guy on the corner, we were all one tiny oneness.

But by the force of nature, nothing regardless of scale escapes the rules that applies to everything and everyone else, and so we find ourselves drifting furter and furter appart along with all the heavenly bodies.

I suppose the main reason we get down at times and why the world can be such a crap place. Is because it would be so very easy for everything to be so very much better. So very much nicer if everyone always did the right thing, we are so close, yet we are moveing away so quicly, we can't grab on to slow down for fear of ripping our arms off.

The most significant question I guess is; why does the universe go through the trouble of existing.

Or, at least it is the current view of science to believe that the universe started in the way stated. The history of history 😛 and the history of science, has always been to have those ideas and statments to turned on their ear. Reality always changes, change being the one constant.

So, I'm fine with believing that for the moment, is my point. As I get ready for the next change, and anticipating it..and actively looking for it. The more things change..the more they stay the same, and therefore....the more things stay the same....the more they change.
 
Hi, Nordic!

Sorry about your finger...

:bigeyes:
There is so much knowledge here!
We should all get together and write a book about logical explanations of the extrinsic nature of the universe (extrinsic in the microchip fabrication term). But I guess it would be hard for everybody to get along well, though.

:cheers:

*CLINK*

- keantoken
 
Ok, someone slap me.
I was happily listening to the amp I finished upgradeing last night, when I started cleaning up the disaster I left in the room.

Anyhow, so there I was cleanin cleanin cleanin, reorganising things, tidying up the power cable was lying on the floor infront of the speaker.

I bent over and picked it up, all of this with my head in pretty close proximity to the tweeter. As I picked up the cable, the high frequencies cleared up asif I picked a thin wet cloth up that was lying over the tweeter. I mean I was totaly impressed with the sound before...

Slightly startled I dropped the cable to the floor... and the now muffled sound returned. I closed my eyes and started to experiment with lifting it, leaving it lying on the floor, touching diffirent parts of the cable with the ground.

WHY THE HEL LIS THIS AFFECTING THE SOUND?
My wife is not going to be impressed tonight when she gets home, the power cable is now wraped over the armrest of the couch by the frontdoor...
 
PART I

Whoa...

Maybe you should test the wire that was being used as an antenna...
Then you could compare the amounts of RF being filtered or rejected. If you were listening to the radio, then there could be some weird kind of cancellation going on.
Of course, it could be something other than RF that is affecting your system. What wire is it? Is it the power cable? If you have HUGE BIG POWERFUL BLASTING speakers, maybe the electromagnetic fields from them are inducing to the cable and causing NFB. I don't know... Maybe the input device has a weird feedback network that's extremely sensitive to the higher frequencies. It might help if you gave us the schematic of your amp or told us the model and make. It may be doing some weird AC thing from you touching it, too.

Sorry if this erratic diagnosis seems far-fetched in places, if not disorganized. I am just trying to have an open mind. 🙂

PART II

Originally posted by KBK
Just be sure to maintain an objective standpoint. Nothing is gospel, not even so called 'gospel'. One should have an open attitude, but not a foolish one which follows any old emotionally satisfying story, just because it feels good to do so. (even then, I fully advise against diving - into anything. Walk. It's safer.) That is the essence of self-delusion, and one of the cornerstones of some religious groups, and so-called 'cults'. Ie, use your own head, keep looking, but don't dive into things without serious premeditation. Stupidity and blind emotional based postioning is for sheeple, well thought out postioning and considerations are for intelligent people. When 'positioning' and 'considerations' start to slide into 'beliefs', that's when the nightmare of gospel and emotion bring blind insanity to the table. Only one of a million ways to state it.

Whoa... I missed this one!
KBK, now I KNOW your a genius! The mark of a truly intelligent person is the ability to remain unaffected by their surroundings and to stay logical and not ignorant. This piece of knowledge is the most essential part of a good scientist's observations and inferences. The fact that you can explain it so well proves that you understand it completely!

:cheers:


All with me now:
*CLINK*

-keantoken
 
"I said hey babe.. take a walk on the wild side"

http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2006/12/07/lost_velvet_und.php

Sold for ~$146k

And now, back to our psychotically featured program:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So, some aspects of the story - as it stands.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Notre Dame. Impossible arches.

Montaomic superconductors-ORME...weighing extactly the same amout less compared to original mass..as the electron orbit deforms.

Water going down the drain-the tangental offset-spinning aspect.

Whirling Dirvishes..... all spinning in the same direction..to escape the tangental aspect of this plane of existence, the tangental aspect of the interactive resultant of the stress fields.

A experienced psychic..taking the ORME, the manna, the white powders, ...and saying flat out..that the experiences garnered, that lie exactly 90deg from this one..saying that it is 'mind blowing', for most folks.

Physics: Spooky 'action at a distance'-superstring theory-planar dynamics of dimensional fields....

Remember the book from 1919 on yogi's describing cooper parings and superdeformed atomic structures, and doing this thing perfectly, well in advance of anyone possibly saying it is a farce. There is no escaping that. Unless one likes to lie to themselves, however, one would not be reading this, but shoving the monitor away in disgust, if so. That one fact alone is enough to make the world spin for person who is capable of being honest with themselves. Someone attempting to become more human, than monkey. Yet...it is one small point..out of literally...thousands. It becomes inescapable - to an internally honest and logical being.

Superconductors..existing as a 'isolated' system. A singular 2-d stress field interaction. One of the 10 dimensional aspects of existence in modern quantum physics. Superstring theory.

Psychics..accessing things 'instantaneously', or this phenomenon in the realm of psychic investigation. Even science has recorded 'instantaneous action at a distance', within the cultures of the cells from the scrapings of the atronauts mouths. The cells would 'spike' in activity, at the exact same moment as tha astronaut was stressed, way out near the moon. This, as a result in a NASA experiment. See the book 'The secret life of plants' for a literal world full of interesting and 100% related phenomena.

Shauberger's rotational vortice work. Spun motors or fluid exchange systems with rotational aspects, vortice based heat exchangers, etc. Reich doesn't look like much of an idiot anymore, does he??? Some of Tesla's more interesting motor designs, his
pumps, for example. Tones and tons of anomolus and anomolus thermal phenomena.

Dynamos..how they need only approximtely 90% (with everything being taken into account in the realm of physics and formulas) of their original start up energy, to start from a dead stop...immediately after havfing been run at full speed. Interestingly enough, mechanical objects are in this same realm as a phenomenon goes, not just the electrical motor.

David Hamel's spinning motors, that shoot off into space. Hutchinson's experiments, multiple field interactions-resulting in physical and gravitational phenomenon. The rocks moving by themselves, out in the nevada desert. Some skidding and wobbling about....hundreds of feet.Non-magnetic rocks and no plausible explaination for it, either. Nada. Zip. Oddly enough, the desert soil is filled with ORME's. And the temperatures go right through the same ranges and at the same rates that Hudson and the alchemists report as being required to do a 'slow reaction' to create the phenomena of superconductivity/dimensional shifting and the alchemical reations to produce ORME's or to produce 'elemental' gold, from the monatomics.

The indian scientists and their spinning torus of liquid mercury resulting in overcoming gravity, and shooting into space.

Mercury being used as a 'perfect mirror' in nearly flat 'bowl', a slow spinning form, for astronomy.

Corkscrewing (impact-degredation) of particles in the records of particle research. (particle acellerators)

Cold Fusion and Brown's gas, within their active, or interactive moments... exhibiting identical phenomena.

And the idea that reality is a series of '2-d stressfields' that all interact on the superconducting planar level (all points in that field being equal and identical, ie all points being the same moment of casualty), and reality (as we know it) being the
tangental "moment" of interaction' of these fields. The resualtant tengental field. Our reality.

Salvia: every person who takes it, reports the same 'whilpool' effect of 'being pulled down'..and ALL, I repeat, everyone experiences the same direction of the whirlpool. The same one the Whirling Dirvishes spin into, to counteract it. Not ehte origins of the Whilring dirvishes. Follow the path to it's origins.

The same one that is evident in the videotapes of boxers, who try to stay aware and in the fight, as they shake off a blow that knocks them nearly unconcious. They all spin in the same direction, depending on what side of the equator -or hemisphere- the fight took place in. Thousands of examples of that on tape. Same as the whirling dirvishes. Same as the Salvia.

Take a leap of logic here, and it is possible to say that one aspect of magnetism is that it is a 'polarization' of 'time'...or 'gravitation'. The two not being mutually exclusive. Or, in this point of analysis, all three not being mutually exclusive.

Then the shape of the arc off the end of a pyramid.

The planar interactive aspects of Tesla's gravity antennas (transmitters/recievers) for 'power generation'. Tesla knew it was, at the very least, a light speed, if not a FTL communications and transmission system. Which is why he proposed it, and he knew the curvature of the earth was not an issue. The fields he was manipulating, went through the earth.

Just like the modern phenomena of the 300x 'speed of light' issue that has had emerged recently, as a recognized phenomena. Quantum entanglement. And the yogi's stating that there was another layer of particles below that subatomic layer, that is yet to be discovered. Very likely tied to that '300x FTL' phenomena in the recorded results of these recent experiments. Planar 2d field oscillations, likely.

I have some very high powered neo magnets. I'm going to mark one with a marker..and observe it as I drop it down a copper pipe. We will see what happens. Although, the
poles, if identical in their intensity, that may interfere in the experiment. However, they are in a gradient gravity field (the earth's gravitational field is a gradient), so there may be a residual rotation. You can take a small supermagnet, and toss it into a elevated plastic 5 gallon pail..one placed so there is no metallic structures near it or on it, and the supermagnet will fall with the poles in the same orientation, over 85% of the time.

So, we are living in the 'resultant dimension' (the tangental offset-resultant interactive) of the interaction of oscillating 2-d stress fields. Good ole' basic vectors.

So, modern religious or, modern 'takes' on religion state that: this is only one aspect of who you are. This 'space' you call 'reality', is only a small part of the 'interdimensional' aspects of who you really are. And that aspect (the one that is reading this, right now) is self contained, isolated, unaware of it's 'greater self'. Unaware of it's true multi-dimensional existence. YOU, as you know yourself, is only a tiny part of your greater self, an isolated tangental offset/aspect/resultant of the interacting 2-d 'super string' stress fields. The other 7 fields that 'we' don't yet 'humanly' understand..and like the 2d guy in the 2-d story..we may never understand. But that, as a point of ignorance, is totally different..than being AWARE.

Unless, of course, one puts in the effort, that one becomes aware.

The exact applicable phrase is...Then one becomes free, of "this mortal coil."

If you, the reader, feel you need more evidence to begin your own personal journey into such, as a point of investigation, then I humbly suggest you see a doctor, specifically a psychiatrist, as everything mentioned here, all these are all existing and known points of real phenomena, that all point in the same direction, all point to a similar conclusion. And none, in the final current or inital analysis, denegrate, pass by, exuse, or fail to work with any aspect of physics, religion, ancient science and recorded phenomena. None fail to work within the envelope any of the 'fringe' results reported in physics, science, or history or psychic investigation. Everything fits. There are no gaps, anywhere. There is no emotion of desire in these points here. Only stark realities. Save the emotions of eleation from discovery for afterward, if need be.

I only speak of a few results and an the analysis of that. There are hundreds of other 'anomolus points of interest' that fit this model exactly. Odd results/equations in Maxwell's equations, and oddities in recored phenomena in science,and in 'psychic' experiences-investigations. They all fit the model, exactly. All math, all science, all true investigative religion ('human growth' oriented religion, not those bizarre controllist farces in some people's worlds), they all fit. All these things I speak of, these are all 'fringe phenomena'..but..they all fit the emergent model, perfectly.

Now, once again, how many thousands of patents applied for, that have been rejected by the US patent office - that address these 'fringe phenomena'? How many? over 4,000..in the San Diego/LA area alone. What is going on here?

Tick tick tick. The penny drops.
 
Nobel prize winnng physicist (Josehpson Junction-Superconductors) defends the paranormal

Now, what say you? Is this man, whom was a hero..before this pronouncement...is he now a 'nutbar'?

Once again, one person's emotional connections to the idea of 'reality' have NOTHING to do with the trure nature of reality.

And do not make the mistake of thinking I think this genleman is emotionally connected to the idea of the paranormal, but rather I think that people generally are emotionally connected to the starker aspects of blunt materialism. Blind to universal truths. Sense of comfort, being in control, and all that.

Everyone is born a genius, but the process of living de-geniuses them."-Buckminster Fuller

Never forget, for one second, to live within the moment of youthful wonder, and exploration. I refused the mantle of adulthood, as it was thrown at me in my teens. I saw the insanity of it - for what it was, and as a human being, did my duty to and for the world, by pointedly spitting it out..and ignoring it.


For as my signature used to say:

99.9999% of what affects our reality will be undetectable by our five senses. We must learn to think for ourselves, rather than to follow blindly what has Been taught.-Buckminster Fuller
 
That was my way round of saying such in the thread on the PS idea, by saying, "The majority of Newton's work was in other areas".

Most scientists don't like the idea that the greater mass of Newton's work was on theology.

Well, Sy, let me take a page form this article and hang it out in front of you:

He also discusses “pathological disbelief” in some scientists, whose attitude can be summed up in the statement: “Even if it were true I wouldn’t believe it”.


:smash: I rest my case. For the XXXth or more time. But I will continue to hammer away. How long? As long as it takes.
 
KBK said:
Most scientists don't like the idea that the greater mass of Newton's work was on theology.
Not to get anywhere NEAR a religion themed comment (which would of course be against the rules) but most scientists take the theories of Newton that can be tested and apply them when appropriate and accurate. For the stuff that cannot be tested, most scientists simply tend to ignore it in terms of their scientific existence.

Theology and philosophy are QUITE separate areas than science. Non-testable hypotheses are not within the realm of scientific exploration, thus the reason that good science actively ignores religious theory when searching for answers and only looks at the data concerning the system being studied. Now, whether this is the correct manner in which to approach answers to life's great questions is a matter for a philosophical discussion that is quite beyond the scope of a DIYaudio forum! 😀

Speaking of baseball, how about them Cubs?!?!?! Signing Soriano? I'm really interested in seeing how THAT will turn out.
 
...to keep tradition up and jack thr thread...

...aww s***, I just watched a DVD copy of "Timeline" - MAAAN - a writer takes pains to research for his novel and Hollywood make a B movie out of it?
Burger them, steam them, hang, draw and quarter them - and in the time most of that piece of junk story is located (1334 AD), people had even more drastic ways to deal with charlatans like Time/AOL/Warner.
:bs: I say.
Greetings Pit
 
SY said:
Newton- genius and nutbar are not mutually exclusive.

Science (and catlovers) should be relieved that nutbars and high BPS clubs were not that popular in the 18th century. Sir Isy might have burned up instead of a fading workaholic genius. :clown:
Unconventionalism may be the biggest trigger for non-traditional thinking.
One of my hard-die finite elements friends at polytech really went into brilliance mode when he hit Frisco after a job offer. (John Nash type of guy)

=>
 
tomtt said:


quite true!


self-reflection seems to be the 'order of the day'

True enough. Touche! but, it brings me back to my favorite fact, of which there is only one of:

There are no facts. Except for this one.

To restate: All is unreal, all is unverifiable, by any means. That one thing is the ony verifiable condtion.

Observation of flow, becomes the act of observation, which creates the fact. In singularity of polarity. A two point singular condtion.

'The Mirror of Descartes', would be a good name for it.


That is the one thing that most people cannot get their head around.