the speed of light and the 1/4wave speaker

I am not sure the 1731.41 is any sort of speed of light I can usefully employ in loudspeaker design.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light

Is this Astronomical units per day? And that is a purely local Earth definition.

The speed of sound is equally local. On Mars it is considerably slower.

Even the size and orbits of Planets evolves with time. I certainly wouldn't calculate the bass loading on a 1/4 wave loudspeaker on that. Surely Thiele-Small loudspeaker parameters are quite reliable?

Certainly 1728 is a very interesting number:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J-invariant

But I generally find that everything about regular loudspeakers screams Pythagoras Triangles in Mechanical and Electrical filter matters. And, of course our old friend Pi (3.14159...) pops up a lot. Mr. Troels Gravesen is a safeish pair of hands on 1/4 wave loading. Why reinvent the wheel?

http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/JA8008.htm

Hope it helps.
you’re too smart don’t let it kick your *** 👍🏻😂I’m serious, you’re very sharp and that’s probably what’s having you overlook things because you’re looking for ultimate detail or something of that nature


Stop thinking about speakers for a minute. Numbers like Lengths and phase angles of freqs from Fb or 0 hz. that have to be put into the speaker? you are far ahead of it already.. Dumb it down.

Use 80÷25.4 as pie and multiply that times 360. Enter that number in meters not feet per second is the speed of sound.

then enter the number 25 into a resonance calculator for pipe with closed or open ends.


Then enter the number0.0625, 0.1250, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4,8,16,32,64,128 m as lengths.
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • 4592DC5B-3916-4ED7-AE67-517AE2460603.png
    4592DC5B-3916-4ED7-AE67-517AE2460603.png
    27.4 KB · Views: 69
If you put the numbers in 1÷2 54 onto a circle as degrees by using equivalent numbers in 22÷7 so that you wouldn’t get confused or would see where they are in that respect.

they’re only slightly different.

That’s why both of them are so helpful.

1496.49188 is the location of earth. orbital mean radius. You use 86 four and 1728 to arrive at it.

Or you can take the -exact- diameter of the sun and radius of the moon instead of 864/ 1728 and still will be left scratching your head as to the -exact Location of the earth or Saturn , except it’ll be even more connected to the final answer or result of all of this
 

Attachments

  • 4BE03EE5-4E35-4E26-8241-4513DA685AFF.jpeg
    4BE03EE5-4E35-4E26-8241-4513DA685AFF.jpeg
    562.6 KB · Views: 60
  • DF84B0DF-BDCA-4BC1-9E22-603F69442919.png
    DF84B0DF-BDCA-4BC1-9E22-603F69442919.png
    47 KB · Views: 64
  • 03EC67C8-DC72-46C1-9083-592810C4E8DC.png
    03EC67C8-DC72-46C1-9083-592810C4E8DC.png
    67.5 KB · Views: 75
  • E1107902-F505-4D85-B03C-0BC40CD66412.png
    E1107902-F505-4D85-B03C-0BC40CD66412.png
    48.4 KB · Views: 55
(432)^2 is 186624(speed of light)

(432)^4 is the exact location of driver entry in any TL speaker.

864^2 is 746496(sq rtvof 75)1/4 sol.(x2)

1728^2 is 2985984 (sq rt of 3 and sol(x2)

1496. Sqrt(1728^2 - 864^2)



93.5(0.5/2.54- 1875)
187(1/2.54)-0.375)
374(2/2.54)-0.75)
748(4/2.54-1.5)
1496(80/2.54)-3
2992 ( 6-(160/2.54)
5984(12-320/2.54)
1968(24-640/2.54???)

ohR this

251968
125984
62992
31496
07874
03937
01986
0984
0492
0246
0123
0628
0314
0157
07854
03928
01314
0657
328.5
164.25
82.125
41.0625
20.53125
10
5
2.5
1.25
0.625
0.3125
0.15625
78125
390625
195.3125

195.28 is the remainder in 104.72 of a 300 cm long 1/4 pipe which you cethe driver in between.

that’s 86.4 or at least a squiggle that you can never resolve never quite right unless you use both sides of the cone. And a piggyback transmission line as well.

In 187 or 3 is already in the meter, and in frequency, of sound, its measure and then wave lentgs of things that are not even light’

Because everything is the same thing it’s all vibrating no matter what and here’s the map to show it as numers in math , all that matters, it doesn’t matter what it looks like, what it sounds like, what it seems to be .

it is what this says it is and it is the same thing
 
Last edited:
Hiding in the numbers and those which represent real things are units of measure of time or meter or mile and the conversion factor between them is hiding the ultimate answers to everything already

This goes on too much bigger concepts that we can’t even graph like big units of time 25,920 years.

Or 66 million years ago
 
Kind of looks like this, ironically you gotta use rectangles…
 

Attachments

  • 1957DAA1-2140-4F93-9D5C-A8A6F5D0AB72.jpeg
    1957DAA1-2140-4F93-9D5C-A8A6F5D0AB72.jpeg
    269.5 KB · Views: 73
  • 24A7747D-FF94-431F-B8E5-799BD4CE5AEF.jpeg
    24A7747D-FF94-431F-B8E5-799BD4CE5AEF.jpeg
    108.6 KB · Views: 79
  • 7C36ECD6-3841-4764-A7A9-99DDED79B36A.jpeg
    7C36ECD6-3841-4764-A7A9-99DDED79B36A.jpeg
    250.9 KB · Views: 59
Kind of looks like this, ironically you gotta use rectangles…
The last pic is the result of the same exact thing as quarter wave is too full wave , which is two 3/4,5/4,7/4 harmonics of quarter wave and repetition of the same things you find in ‘higher order 1/4 speaker designs’ aligning to certain things that are defined using 05236 (pi/6) To connect them all.

Yes that includes the future or the next interrupting H/global warming/meteor strike as it has repeatedly in the history of the world that nobody dares to look at or mention??

It’s very important for obvious reasons to figure this outIt’s very important for obvious reasons to figure this out. Let’s pretend it is our next extinction for a minute and look into that and see if it’s true?

June 30th 1908, Summer 66 million years ago

I’ll look at June 30 again and again and again 11,800 years ago? 4500? I don’t know archaeology won’t hurry up catch up because they’ve been held down so Long by the church .. But look how many more there are there already confirmed. Where does that leave those number sequences and look at how many familiar frequencies are in there

every single june 30th and every single Halloween this planet spends about a week going through the torrid meteor belt. It has been confirmed already to be the result of a great many disasters. either way it’s either stand out section or second section that we end up in and it’s never ever predicted correctly it’s always at random dispersion or density of dangerous junk that we find entertaining as shooting stars and lots of them spectacular!

Like clockwork this is spelled out in the canceled frequencies of A perfectly aligned sound making device 360 cm long with an offset of 30 cm from each end for some strange reason?

what is that cycle combined with the knowledge of an existing perpetrator to our own existence combine to tell you?

It means 25920 years ago (minusExpansion rate and slow down of time) in the universe there is an interval no different than that been a great year or larger sequence of spinning on earth that changes the 23.44* axis from one side to the other and back , this the rest of the details of all of this

108(moon) 1079.6
216(moon)2159.2
432(sun)(432376
864(sun)864752)
1728(moon)(1732)
3456(moon(3464)

look at the numbers in 11÷254Decimal points
2.75/2.54,5.5,11,22,44,88,176,352,704,1408,… They all say it youre just tapping in at different points How long the second essentially same thing as happens in a quarter wave pipe


6912(162)
13824(324)
22648(648)
55296(1296)
110592(2592)(1944,1296,648)
…..
 
Last edited:
By contrast, the cm or meter has no natural relationship to any everyday human experience but to a precious metal meter stick made of platinum 1.000 meter long (by definition) kept in a safe somewhere.
Yes, there is some fancy piece of metal somewhere, and the definition in the dictionary:
defined from 1889 to 1960 as the distance between two lines on a platinum-iridium bar (the “International Prototype Meter”) preserved at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures near Paris; from 1960 to 1983 defined as 1,650,763.73 wavelengths of the orange-red radiation of krypton 86 under specified conditions; and now defined as 1/299,792,458 of the distance light travels in a vacuum in one second.
So while the very strict definition of 1 meter does seem a bit far fetched, it is nice to know there is a definition that is less likely to change over time.

However, the best everyday "yardstick" to the current metric system IMO is 1kg water at specific temperature and pressure that equates to 1 litre worth of volume, 1 litre in a perfect cube is 1dm3 = 10cm*10cm*10cm. 1 metric tonne of water = 1000kg = 1m*1m*1m. Every single day I am reminded of volume and weight, so I always have a certain ballpark sense of how much volume a litre is and how much it would weigh, and therefore also a constant reminder of the measurement scale.

So while it may not have any relevance to YOUR "everyday human experience", for me it is a constant reminder.
Just sayin'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMFahey
25 Thousand 920 years doesn’t concern anyone or would it..

and there’s been so many conspiracy theories and lies and goofy *** numerology and contaminated baloney in science math religion etc. that nobody would even recognize the truth if it slapped upside the head as an anvil.

So use frequency and the things about it that you already know in speakers to figure out the truth. there’s no lies , it immediately goes out of phase instead, and all of thisScrewed up and it shows up real quick when things aren’t good already

ironic that it takes three forms of the number pi to confirm all of these things no matter what? All of those work fine in math all of those point out landmarks no matter what all of them are real things that anyone can look at already

It’s already screaming because theres akready a mistake in it before the start even happens. because it is not 64 it is .06299212598425196850393 from 4/3.937xxxxcccccc(x) That right there is left to observe for whatever reason in the numbers already.

it’s freaky but it’s 2992 it’s not 6.2992.

Cause 2992÷2 is 1496 these numbers all work ‘almost perfect’ They hold the error of time dilation or whatever the expanding universe leaves in the math of everything already

But it’s just sitting right there inside the centimeters converted to an inch already shouldn’t be any more obvious except for the fact that it’s sitting in the decimal points where we don’t even look anyhow
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    498.4 KB · Views: 62
Last edited:
The moment you look at 11÷254 and at the same time 432(7) 864(14) 1728(28)3456(56)6912(12(13824(24

but notice it is 433(070)866)14(1732(28)3464(56)6929(12)13858(24…It gets real tricky but keep going

Where the sun is pi not 6Where the sun is pi not 6.912

Big bang is 14 not 13.824….

Never forget that the moon is not 1079.6, but its nit 108 either? However all of them are very important and hover around the concept of the main numbers which they are represented by in both math and the entire universe once you look at every detail of every planet in every shape size and function. Very detailed in mass surface area density skate velocity and all of these things still holding up on the same exact numbers almost brilliantly almost too ridiculous to even look at not just blame something else is coincidence or stupidity or reckless use of coincidence again and again

There they are again and make no mistake about how they are represented in math of a 360 cm subwoofer. Cause unless you’re not looking in the details and everything about everything including what’s shown in the simulations and construction as a result of all the things put together then you haven’t given yourself a fair shake it knowing or understanding anything it seems and we all have got to look for ourselves, It’s only we can convince us of something no one else should be able to control us like they do already and put things in your head that you couldn’t have just come up with yourself that may have been very very different if you were free to think. Magine how good of a person you might be if you didn’t have outside influences twisting contorting your ideas of how things are or work or about other people far away? Imagine what you would be like if everything you knew was only because you experienced it yourself? Quality of person the ability to make decisions and do things in a way that is not how you have in the past or ever will be able to.
Poisoned by a society just like your education

It seems that this kind of thing already exists in these numbers and inside this strange system that filters numbers through a number of ways and present them in sound in specific ducting that all is about a circle but is just the shape of rectangles actually
 
Last edited:
Yes, there is some fancy piece of metal somewhere, and the definition in the dictionary:

So while the very strict definition of 1 meter does seem a bit far fetched, it is nice to know there is a definition that is less likely to change over time.

However, the best everyday "yardstick" to the current metric system IMO is 1kg water at specific temperature and pressure that equates to 1 litre worth of volume, 1 litre in a perfect cube is 1dm3 = 10cm*10cm*10cm. 1 metric tonne of water = 1000kg = 1m*1m*1m. Every single day I am reminded of volume and weight, so I always have a certain ballpark sense of how much volume a litre is and how much it would weigh, and therefore also a constant reminder of the measurement scale.

So while it may not have any relevance to YOUR "everyday human experience", for me it is a constant reminder.
Just sayin'.
Krypton 88 is the fission fragment sister of xenon 138 which is the cause of Chernobyl. And out of phase resonance essentially, The big bang type of bounce through many layers of the conservation of energy including an idle turbine , shut down steam plant that has no source from the reactor at the time, but providing electricity to run the system while it’s trying to be reengaged.

Only then will it build up to a point in cold water insertion that will spike the holy cry moly out of the fission at the time. This will be completely and totally disastrous due to the already existing problem with xenon /Krypton build up in the core. It will look just like the electrical impedance phaseplot In a higher order enclosure strangely. Not one that’s lined up…. Instead jacked up and ceazy (Golden Paraflex comes to mind) prior to the launch of inductance up top
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    595.1 KB · Views: 64
Last edited:
Krypton 88 is the fission fragment sister of xenon 138 which is the cause of Chernobyl. And out of phase resonance essentially, The big bang type of bounce through many layers of the conservation of energy including an idle turbine , shut down steam plant that has no source from the reactor at the time, but providing electricity to run the system while it’s trying to be reengaged.

Only then will it build up to a point in cold water insertion that will spike the holy cry moly out of the fission at the time. This will be completely and totally disastrous due to the already existing problem with xenon /Krypton build up in the core. It will look just like the electrical impedance phaseplot In a higher order enclosure strangely. Not one that’s lined up…. Instead jacked up and ceazy (Golden Paraflex comes to mind) prior to the launch of inductance up top
Its Not just hz it’s also 1,000,000 km or it’s an atomic mass unit or it’s the number of parts in isotopes that are radioactive that matter. It’s like dark matter. They’re all the same numbers some of them need a unit conversion in order to see this but they are all the same for a reason
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    826.3 KB · Views: 58
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    771.3 KB · Views: 56
Its Not just hz it’s also 1,000,000 km or it’s an atomic mass unit or it’s the number of parts in isotopes that are radioactive that matter. It’s like dark matter. They’re all the same numbers some of them need a unit conversion in order to see this but they are all the same for a reason
It never ends it just start sounding silly as heck at first so nobody would bother… it isn’t silly it just sounds silly because of what we’re used to hearing of what we think is normal.

That’s why you take it upon yourself to look at what I’m trying to say instead of listening to me babble about it.. And whatever you see please please come back and share it
 
Oh, it´s just a particular case of:

https://www.thoughtco.com/word-salad-definition-1692505

just replace "words" by "numbers" in the definition and it fits like a glove.

even better: in the last OP posts it´s gone from "numbers" to "words", so meeting the classic definition even better.


Booger weldz said:
But 1728 is (1731.41..) is the speed of light, so look at what you’re doing and see how incredibly important it is actually!!!

You’re using a little’cheat’to navigate through things in higher orders that are the speed of light


I am not sure the 1731.41 is any sort of speed of light I can usefully employ in loudspeaker design.

I certainly wouldn't calculate the bass loading on a 1/4 wave loudspeaker on that. Surely Thiele-Small loudspeaker parameters are quite reliable?

Mr. Troels Gravesen is a safeish pair of hands on 1/4 wave loading. Why reinvent the wheel?
 
Last edited:
Oh, it´s just a particular case of:

https://www.thoughtco.com/word-salad-definition-1692505

just replace "words" by "numbers" in the definition and it fits like a glove.

even better: in the last OP posts it´s gone from "numbers" to "words", so meeting the classic definition even better.
Oh, it´s just a particular case of:

https://www.thoughtco.com/word-salad-definition-1692505

just replace "words" by "numbers" in the definition and it fits like a glove.

even better: in the last OP posts it´s gone from "numbers" to "words", so meeting the classic definition even better.
Hey, call it what you want, just trying to spread ideas around. If you can’t grasp it or if it somehow offends you? Nobody cares, we’re all enjoying whatever this creates already. Or try to dig into it even further and spread it around in other ways.. That’s ~ 5700 people elsewhere and counting….

Sorry if this doesn’t work for you dude, it’s hard enough to describe it but you make it entertaining and thus less inhibiting to even not try on account of the fact that people like you are going to do this no matter what and it’s hilarious.

No offense but you’ve got to be dumber than dumb to not at least consider looking into this … but if poking fun at it Instead is what you gotta do?? Game on, it’s just making it easier. Maybe it’ll just roll off the tongue soon??? and not sound so awkward not being able to describe it very well and over trying….
 
Hey, call it what you want, just trying to spread ideas around. If you can’t grasp it or if it somehow offends you? Nobody cares, we’re all enjoying whatever this creates already. Or try to dig into it even further and spread it around in other ways.. That’s ~ 5700 people elsewhere and counting….

Sorry if this doesn’t work for you dude, it’s hard enough to describe it but you make it entertaining and thus less inhibiting to even not try on account of the fact that people like you are going to do this no matter what and it’s hilarious.

No offense but you’ve got to be dumber than dumb to not at least consider looking into this … but if poking fun at it Instead is what you gotta do?? Game on, it’s just making it easier. Maybe it’ll just roll off the tongue soon??? and not sound so awkward not being able to describe it very well and over trying….
4.33” is?

8.66” is?
1.732” is?
3.464”?
6.929”?
13.858”?


try 11÷254?

(Hint: you can’t use your fingers and your toes you’re gonna have to use a calculator with a pretty long screen on it to see all decimals)….
 
You are certainly making me think hard here Mr. Booger weldz! :scratch1:

First up, "Forget Einstein, meet Weinstein!" The new Theory of Everything!


Did anyone notice, as I did, that the interviewer, Lex Fridman, appears heavily medicated by anti-psychotic medicine? This raises alarm bells for me starightaway.

I didn't wade through the whole 3 hours, having things to do today. But it seems Mr. Weinstein has not fleshed his ideas out into anything resembling a peer-reviewable paper.

His original radical presentation of how the Universe works lacked any serious particle physics physicists or cosmologists in the audience, which doubtless would have slightly dumbed down the audience. 🙁

Next up, your quarter wave pipe calculations. I am pretty sure it is usually considered near enough for the speed of sound to be 343.7 m/s. And Pi is 3.14159... I was unable to derive your value, which appears to be 1133.85... m/s.

Use 80÷25.4 as pie and multiply that times 360. Enter that number in meters not feet per second is the speed of sound.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Waves/opecol.html#c1

Maybe I am missing something. 🤔

Your reference to the Torrid or Taurid meteor shower certainly alarmed me. Here is a large Space Rock Comet Encke and its large companions which may impact Earth in the near future:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_Encke

Certainly a worry, since this shower has larger than usual components, and crosses our orbit. 😳

The original meter of length was defined as "The metre was originally defined in 1793 as one ten-millionth of the distance from the equator to the North Pole along a great circle, so the Earth's circumference is approximately 40,000 km."

Thus one should be unsurprised that the size of planet Earth should be integer related to the meter. Since the speed of light is approx 300,000 Km/s, there is a further likelihood of finding further odd and surprising numerical relations. But perhaps you are reading too much into certain things.

I wonder if you have been dabbling too much into Numerology?

Numerology is the pseudoscientific belief in a divine or mystical relationship between a number and one or more coinciding events. It is also the study of the numerical value of the letters in words, names, and ideas. It is often associated with the paranormal, alongside astrology and similar to divinatory arts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerology

I think we need clear answers here. 🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMFahey