The simplest DEFiSIT with 2SK182ES

I removed the diodes and 1000u caps and checked the connections but I'm not sure if the 0.1R current reading resistors is causing me problems or if it's saving my neck because they are getting really hot even at very low rail voltages. I am slowly bringing it up with the variac and reading 600mV over 0.1R or 6A going through each rail. Rough math gives 3.6W so it's no wonder these are starting to smoke (3W rated) an hit over 120C (temperature) ...

I guess if the rail voltage is not high enough, the depletion mode device will be wide open but I don't understand why both rails are drawing so much current.

:hot:😕😕😕
 
Current schematic except I am using FQA12P20 instead of IRFP9240

Degeneration on N-SIC (depletion) side 0.05R and I have 0.1R resistors between the OP devices and rails (R10 and R11)
 

Attachments

  • basic_sch.JPG
    basic_sch.JPG
    64.6 KB · Views: 223
  • DEFiSIT_UJ3N120065K3S_v1.3.asc
    DEFiSIT_UJ3N120065K3S_v1.3.asc
    3.2 KB · Views: 47
If it's not already obvious, I am very much a newbie at spice.

I googled how to measure current through a spot and found that the current going through R10 and R11 will be 8.08A and 6.52W. Time to add more resistors but at least it's expected
 

Attachments

  • draw.JPG
    draw.JPG
    79.3 KB · Views: 187
It may be obvious to some of you but wasn't immediately obvious to me - I'll solder a second 0.1R 3W onto the legs of R10 and R11 and it should drop resistance to 0.05R and power through that to just over 3W
 

Attachments

  • lazy_fix.JPG
    lazy_fix.JPG
    82.4 KB · Views: 175
If you like zero or small degenerating, you have to have perfect matched NJet and PMos at Vds, Vgs and Iq condition.

For not ideal components, either R8 or R2 has to be much larger than you used.

Your Vgs of NJet at 1.3A is lower than Vgs of PMos. If using the schematics in#45, Iq is huge. It is not going to work.
 
Last edited:
Went back to the drawing board and played around with the degeneration.

With 1.5R degeneration, it's possible to get the current draw down to 1.4A and it looks like it doesn't really matter which device gets the degeneration but you can decide to drive one side through greater current swing than the other depending on how you distribute the total degeneration resistance.

If one were to apply Schade feedback to one of the devices and distributed the degeneration to cause that side to have greater voltage swing, would that effectively increase that side's influence on the sound? (my crazy conspiracy theory).

Blew out the IEC fuse last night with the bad circuit (the one that was trying to draw 8A through each rail) so I'm taking a break from the soldering iron at least for now :umbrella:
 

Attachments

  • DEF_degeneration.JPG
    DEF_degeneration.JPG
    161.1 KB · Views: 167