The new Nonoz II DAC page !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Re: Re: TL431

Guido Tent said:


Elso

Typo from my side, I meant TL

Guido

Guido you are confusing me.
The LT1431 from Linear Technology, as mentioned by Massimo, has indeed a earlier rising impedance curve.
The TL1431 from Texas Instruments has the same impedance curve as the TL431. Even the schematic given by TI is the same. The TL1431 seems to be just a tighter speced TL431.
:bigeyes:
 
The schematic is too big for attaching on this forum. I want to mail it to you but you have to leave a mailadress since I can't attach anything with the Mail function of Diyaudio.com.

So for the last time, leave you mailadress in a way like this to avoid spamming:

dennis_nospam@hotmaildotcom.
 
schematic

please forward it to

engp1110_NoSpam@nusDOTeduDOTsg

Thanks,
Yeo



jean-paul said:
The schematic is too big for attaching on this forum. I want to mail it to you but you have to leave a mailadress since I can't attach anything with the Mail function of Diyaudio.com.

So for the last time, leave you mailadress in a way like this to avoid spamming:

dennis_nospam@hotmaildotcom.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: TL431

Elso Kwak said:


Guido you are confusing me.
The LT1431 from Linear Technology, as mentioned by Massimo, has indeed a earlier rising impedance curve.
The TL1431 from Texas Instruments has the same impedance curve as the TL431. Even the schematic given by TI is the same. The TL1431 seems to be just a tighter speced TL431.
:bigeyes:

Hi Elso,

Either way, both are no good for audio, at least to my knowledge. I'd prefer flat impedances at least straight up to over 100 kHz when used in an analogue circuit.

best regards
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TL431

Guido Tent said:


Hi Elso,

Either way, both are no good for audio, at least to my knowledge. I'd prefer flat impedances at least straight up to over 100 kHz when used in an analogue circuit.

best regards
Sorry Guido,
You keep confusing me!
😕 😕
The TL431 is used in the recommended power supply for your clock by Cuno Snoeren:
http://www1.tip.nl/~t708955/schem/xoschema.jpg
Did you change your opininion or do you no longer approve this circuit for your clock? If so what do you recommend now? Are we talking at cross-purposes???
😕
See also :
http://www1.tip.nl/~t708955/cunos.htm
(Scroll down to CD-player Upgrade II). The circuit is also in your PDF-file"The why and how of low-jitter oscillators"
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TL431

Elso Kwak said:

Sorry Guido,
You keep confusing me!
😕 😕
The TL431 is used in the recommended power supply for your clock by Cuno Snoeren:
http://www1.tip.nl/~t708955/schem/xoschema.jpg
Did you change your opininion or do you no longer approve this circuit for your clock?

Elso

Cuno's circuit is a fine sollution, easy to build hence acceptable for most people and does not need any adjustments.

My own power supply is different, more complex, needs adjustment and therefor not the best compromise for the average customer

My supply noise is below 5 nV / Sqrrt Hz. I never optained noise measurements on Cuno's supply.

best regards
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TL431

Guido Tent said:


Elso

Cuno's circuit is a fine sollution, easy to build hence acceptable for most people and does not need any adjustments.

My own power supply is different, more complex, needs adjustment and therefor not the best compromise for the average customer

My supply noise is below 5 nV / Sqrrt Hz. I never optained noise measurements on Cuno's supply.

best regards

Dear Guido,
Thanks for the reply.
Now the sharp-eyed reader sees a TO-220 voltage regulator, some caps and a pot on your circuit and is wondering how to achieve 5nV/Sqrrt Hz noise?
😕
Don't feel obliged to share the schematic....😉
Best regards,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.