I can't get what I am trying to scan to appear so I will type out an abridged version of a letter from another designer regarding Bybee devices.
'I have briefly reviewed Bybee's web site and believe I have a handle on their technology. It appears that they are using a doped ceramic conductor that is near superconductivity at room temperature. This would effectively create a frequency window inside of which electrons would travel over 90% the speed of light and outside of which electrons would meet great resistance. Another way of looking at it is that this is a filter without an inductor or capacitor. ... Electrically, the Bybee filter would minimize internal acoustic noise because the electrons would have a minimum of collisions with neutrons in the Bybee ceramic material. Electrons that collide with neutrons or photons create what are commonly known as phonons. Whenever electrons travel though a superconductor they tend to line up, which minimizes the number of phonons and therefore electrical noise. ...'
'I have briefly reviewed Bybee's web site and believe I have a handle on their technology. It appears that they are using a doped ceramic conductor that is near superconductivity at room temperature. This would effectively create a frequency window inside of which electrons would travel over 90% the speed of light and outside of which electrons would meet great resistance. Another way of looking at it is that this is a filter without an inductor or capacitor. ... Electrically, the Bybee filter would minimize internal acoustic noise because the electrons would have a minimum of collisions with neutrons in the Bybee ceramic material. Electrons that collide with neutrons or photons create what are commonly known as phonons. Whenever electrons travel though a superconductor they tend to line up, which minimizes the number of phonons and therefore electrical noise. ...'
Last edited:
The measurements look like some ~1kHz noise is gone (inductor? 😱), but the peak-peak level in the residual looks higher in the clean graph..... could be a drill was turned off for the second measurement 😉 A spectrum might be more interesting than a time domain response...
electrons do not travel with the speed of light even in superconducting materials. it is more like a play of billiard where one ball pushes the other and the effect travels quite fast. superconducting at room temperature has never being witnessed to my knowlage up to now. that whould solve the energy problem and i whould like to buy stock in mr. bybees company right away. speed higher then the speed of light has being measured at the university of Bonn but after carefull examination it was concluded that the phase travels faster then the amplitude.
Joachim nobody said that electrons travel at the speed of light, only greater than 90% or so the speed of light. Please don't guess what is happening. By the way a BIG German manufacture was caught trying to remove the artificial granite layer to analyze the devices about 15 years ago, after THEY measured it.
Does NASA know that they clipped the rarefaction on that sine wave? Not that it matters just thought that was funny. And yeah I would rather see spectral analysis when down that low.
That was the picture made by the test equipment, the BMI 8800. It doesn't really effect the test measurement.
when i disassambled a japanese tuning chip for room acoustics i found "redrum" printed on the inside. you may remember the film "Shining" with Jach Nicholson. the other way around it is "murder". this is no joke. ok, folks i go sleeping and leave you alone tonight. i take you serious john and will give the product a listen. my ears have been tested recently and i scored above average for my age.
That whole paragraph looks like pseudoscientific gobbledygook to me, but then quantum physics is not my area...
Wavelength at acoustic frequencies in a ceramic is going to be measured in hundreds of feet to miles and an inch long device is having an effect?
Joachim is correct about the electron propagation velocity, as well.
Here is a response to a child's question by a government scientist:
Electron Speed in Superconductor
Maybe he works for NASA, but he could be faking it.
hy ron. you are my man. now i REALLY can go sleeping without nightmares of massive quantumobjects traveling at 90% speed of light. those lilltele electrons get quite heavy when the are so fast and could destroy my sensitive skin.
Few people are familiar with the real story behind the NASA moon landing, as the mainstream media are all paid off by the Masons and other conspirators. You must wear an aluminum foil beanie to prevent brainwashing from these evil sources.
So let me tell you about the real deal. The first person to land on the moon was not Neil Armstrong nor was it Buzz Aldrin. It was none other than Jack Bybee. He landed on the moon with his rocket-powered Bentley, launched from a submarine at 1000 feet below sea level. Imagine Jack's Bentley, bursting from the surface of the ocean, traveling far faster than the speed of sound, creating a sonic boom that literally deafened all those within a 10,000 mile radius. Being the source of this sonic boom meant of course that he was spared the awesome sonic impact and was able to retain his golden-ear status some 40 years later.
The Bentley was able to make a smooth landing on the moon, and when Jack stepped out, it was one small step for man, but one giant leap for mankind. Jack himself is very modest about this, and of course would be the last person to take credit. He had to face many technical problems on re-entry to the earth's atmosphere too, which almost cost him his life. The Bentley's tires melted on re-entry, yet despite this, he was able to land on an aircraft carrier, heroically guiding the Bentley on its rims to a smooth stop. Dick Sequerra was on the aircraft carrier, cheering as all this took place, and offering Jack a "welcome home" medal as he opened up the door of the Bentley to wave to the ecstatic crowd.
And to think that I saw it on Mulberry Street.
So let me tell you about the real deal. The first person to land on the moon was not Neil Armstrong nor was it Buzz Aldrin. It was none other than Jack Bybee. He landed on the moon with his rocket-powered Bentley, launched from a submarine at 1000 feet below sea level. Imagine Jack's Bentley, bursting from the surface of the ocean, traveling far faster than the speed of sound, creating a sonic boom that literally deafened all those within a 10,000 mile radius. Being the source of this sonic boom meant of course that he was spared the awesome sonic impact and was able to retain his golden-ear status some 40 years later.
The Bentley was able to make a smooth landing on the moon, and when Jack stepped out, it was one small step for man, but one giant leap for mankind. Jack himself is very modest about this, and of course would be the last person to take credit. He had to face many technical problems on re-entry to the earth's atmosphere too, which almost cost him his life. The Bentley's tires melted on re-entry, yet despite this, he was able to land on an aircraft carrier, heroically guiding the Bentley on its rims to a smooth stop. Dick Sequerra was on the aircraft carrier, cheering as all this took place, and offering Jack a "welcome home" medal as he opened up the door of the Bentley to wave to the ecstatic crowd.
And to think that I saw it on Mulberry Street.
The problem in the past was that John did not have administrator account on the MAC. Similar as when you have a GUEST account on a conventional PC. So he could not attach images, and also we had problems when I did send him MicroCap files. Now he probably has the administrator account, or the new DIYaudio forum SW engine, that appeared about 1-2 month ago, manages attachements in a different way, than the former engine.
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.