If anyone would like to go back and read the OP, this thread is about subjective listening impressions. Anyone who finds that distressing is always free to participate in any of the more 'Steady-State FFT' measurement oriented threads, in which measurements are, by the way, often rather subjectively interpreted, and subject to human opinion.
Last edited:
In an environment that is presented as one hosted by a supernatural being, I guess some may feel it is them that is being tested? perhaps that s why you struggle to get many participants?
Side note: the ML panels and your headphone rig as read, should be good draw cards though. I have no doubt the sound is impressive.
Speakers were the reason for the last visit IMHO. The group took a long driving detour to get here, only to listen for about an hour. That was enough time to hear what they were interested in hearing, then they had to drive back down to the Bay Area in order to return the car on time.
The title of this thread "The battle of the DACs, comparison of sound quality between some DACs" or the opening post don't mention that this is about subjective listening impressions. Where did you pick that up from?
You already do, yourself.
Those are not his and they are placed in a room with poor acoustics.
Someone's subjective opinion?
Those ML panels are not yours and the room acoustics issue was already brought up which you ran away from ignored.
More troll bait thinly veiled as subjective opinion? Why wasn't this guy banned a long time ago for skirting around the rules?
Last edited:
Just a fairy tale, as almost always in a consumer audio. No more wasting time here, for me.
Why are You still not banned?
hm?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.