testing for stability

Status
Not open for further replies.
input cap

AndrewT said:
... I do not want to ALTER/MODIFY the amp just for the test, I believe that it should be tested as built.

I agree. Anyway, when will your amp be submitted to an almost perfect square wave of 10 KHz (not in saturation condition of course)?🙄
Can a source with normal music content and then passing through a pre-amp feed such a waveform to a power amp?😉

AndrewT said:
I agree with all the above.
What do I read into this following part?
If the amp is bordering on instability when the phase margin is reduced due to feeding a capacitive, then this will show more readily by feeding a squarewave to the input. But if one feeds a square wave to the input of the low pass filter then it is no longer a squarewave (it is a rounded corner approximation with much of the extended hi frequency content attenuated).....

Yes, I evaluate the amp with and without the input cap but I consider that the real thing is with the cap and optimise the rest based on that...🙂
 
Hi Guys,
my stability test with another values. i would like to know if it's OK? Thank You! Maxpou
value: 10Khz, 0.47uF, 10Vp-p
 

Attachments

  • 10khz, 0.47uf,10vp-p.jpg
    10khz, 0.47uf,10vp-p.jpg
    80.7 KB · Views: 525
Hi,
I think that ripple goes on a bit too long. It has little damping indicating that the amp or the output Thiele network is close to oscillating.

I think the 50 to 60kHz ripple should subside to near zero in less than half the period of the 10kHz half wave i.e. in <=25uS.

What's it like with a lower frequency sq wave?
 
Hi,
That damps out fairly quickly.
Do you notice the frequency is directly related to the capacitance.
It's ringing in the Thiele network we are seeing, but it still seems to last too long
I wonder if the phase margin is a little low?

Could some of our experienced designers step in and offer opinion (or better still quote the builder's bible)?
 
Hi,
That damps out fairly quickly.
Do you notice the frequency is directly related to the capacitance.
It's ringing in the Thiele network we are seeing, but it still seems to last too long
I wonder if the phase margin is a little low?

Could some of our experienced designers step in and offer opinion (or better still quote the builder's bible)?
Hexfets are fast, and that one isn't so quick for hexfet.
It is looks like ringing is limited for few volts that show it caused by saturated transistors or limited OPS Rds or may be also caused by limited trace capability effect, because if it caused by output inductor, ringing amplitude will also rises. I simulate it with perfect condition it has 40A peak charging output 2uF capacitive load.

The second picture is simulated my N3 buffer. Not draw huge peak current when loaded with capacitive loads is also important for some cases.
 

Attachments

  • better or no amp.PNG
    better or no amp.PNG
    30.4 KB · Views: 280
  • N3 square.PNG
    N3 square.PNG
    55.6 KB · Views: 273
Last edited:
Hi Guys!,
nobody can help me with my stability problem. How can I improve it? I tried a Cdom in VAS, decrease the open loop gain with R33, R34 and a input filter. If I put 3 output pairs I improve my stability or no on capacitive load? I would like to know what is the acceptable ringing square wave? thank you! Maxpou
 
May be slewrate limiting will help by replacing both 47pf with 220pf. The other way is placing source resistor with value ~0.5ohm and ~330ohm resistor between emitter of driver transistor and output that may help to limit maximum current.
 
I see this is a sim result and not a true life result, there is a huge difference. I ve built this type amp years ago, its very stable. Also youre probably not going to find a 2uf cap accross a speaker load the way you have it. Show us a real life scope pic of this problem, 10 to 1 is that it doesnt excist. Try use a diffrent transistor for the vas stage, something like 2sa1381 and complement, you can get the device models from bob cordell and see if it doesnt improve.
 
May be slewrate limiting will help by replacing both 47pf with 220pf. The other way is placing source resistor with value ~0.5ohm and ~330ohm resistor between emitter of driver transistor and output that may help to limit maximum current.

Hi ontoaba and homemodder,
I have tried a input filter 1K serie resistor with 270pF and it doesn't improved. Yesterday I have changed my driver with MJE15030, 31 and nothing change. Like I ask you in another post I make a test with only 1 output pair and not 3 outputs pair like on my pictures. I would like to know if it's my problem?

Home, I have BD139, 140 or MJE340 and 350. I will post some pictures soon.thank you! Maxpou
 
Hi Guys,
some pictures with and without output inductor. comments. Maxpou
 

Attachments

  • MJe15030 R33,34=75K+47pF, L1 2.5uH+4.3ohms.JPG
    MJe15030 R33,34=75K+47pF, L1 2.5uH+4.3ohms.JPG
    173.4 KB · Views: 76
  • MJE15030 R33,34 75K+47pF without L1.JPG
    MJE15030 R33,34 75K+47pF without L1.JPG
    180.1 KB · Views: 179
  • 2SC5171 R33,34= 75K+47pF, L1 2.5uH+4.3ohms.JPG
    2SC5171 R33,34= 75K+47pF, L1 2.5uH+4.3ohms.JPG
    168.6 KB · Views: 187
  • 2SC5171 R33,34  75K+47pF without L1.JPG
    2SC5171 R33,34 75K+47pF without L1.JPG
    177.6 KB · Views: 202
Last edited:
another pictures
 

Attachments

  • 2SC5171 R33,34=37.5K, L1 2.5uH+4.3ohms.JPG
    2SC5171 R33,34=37.5K, L1 2.5uH+4.3ohms.JPG
    179.9 KB · Views: 76
  • 2SC5171 R33,34= 37.5K, without L1.JPG
    2SC5171 R33,34= 37.5K, without L1.JPG
    181.3 KB · Views: 70
  • 2SC5171 r33,34= 42K, L1 2.5uH+4.3ohms.JPG
    2SC5171 r33,34= 42K, L1 2.5uH+4.3ohms.JPG
    174.9 KB · Views: 72
  • 2SC5171 R33,34= 42K, without L1.JPG
    2SC5171 R33,34= 42K, without L1.JPG
    180.2 KB · Views: 66
  • 2SC5171 R33,34= 42K+47pF, L1 2.5uh+4.3.JPG
    2SC5171 R33,34= 42K+47pF, L1 2.5uh+4.3.JPG
    178.8 KB · Views: 68
Status
Not open for further replies.