Tang Band W4-1720/Series X-over help needed !

Status
Not open for further replies.
From all that I have read or seen I believe this to be a summed X-over point as shown >
 

Attachments

  • tb-sb-fr.jpg
    tb-sb-fr.jpg
    73.6 KB · Views: 180
I'm still gonna try your X-over, the tweeter will be mounted about a 1/4 inch from the woofer which gives me a 4.25 inch C-T-C spacing ! I would probably bet not all designs follow the spacing rule to the letter anyway. Your response graph looks to good to not give it a shot, and the X-over parts count is low. I have some 0.6mh coils, once I can get my hands on some 0.06mh coils and wire them in series she will be a go ! Thank-you for all your work, I,ll let you know my progress when all the parts arrive and I get them built.
 
I think I got it now ! So would it be safe to say a C-T-C spacing based on the above graph could be about 8 inches or less ? If so DrDyna please forgive my ignorance !

This is still some of the stuff I'm learning myself. If it's 1/4 wavelength at that crossover point, that would make it a little more than half an inch I think, which would be very difficult.

I'd probably settle for "as close as possible."

You could always give this a look but beware, your brain might hurt. Mine did after about 5 minutes.
 
This is still some of the stuff I'm learning myself. If it's 1/4 wavelength at that crossover point, that would make it a little more than half an inch I think, which would be very difficult.

I'd probably settle for "as close as possible."

You could always give this a look but beware, your brain might hurt. Mine did after about 5 minutes.

It was that article that really lit some things up for me re MTMs.

Most cone/dome speakers are compromised wrt driver spacing and my calculation was intended to exemplify that. The less than optimal CTC are what cause lobing, and to a lesser extent the flare in the dispersion at the bottom of the tweeter passband.

dave
 
Status
Not open for further replies.