Sawasdee Franz,
O.K. I agree with you about ROE, anyway, I'm still not be able to find out my cap datasheet. I enclosured the capacitor picture in this thread, it's the same capacitor with mine. Please help me to tell its is a non-polarized cap or not.
Kho Samui, a my sister's friend is a bungalow owner on Chaweng beach, if you will visit there again, I will suggest you that bungalow. It's a nice bungalow on Chaweng beach.
O.K. I agree with you about ROE, anyway, I'm still not be able to find out my cap datasheet. I enclosured the capacitor picture in this thread, it's the same capacitor with mine. Please help me to tell its is a non-polarized cap or not.
Kho Samui, a my sister's friend is a bungalow owner on Chaweng beach, if you will visit there again, I will suggest you that bungalow. It's a nice bungalow on Chaweng beach.
Attachments
gengcard said:
Gengcard,
They look exactly the same types as the ones that are used in the fb for the old Naim Nac pre-amps, I have a couple here which are polarised.
On all the ones I have the + is infront of the R where its marked ROE in the little box, the - is after the E.
There does not seem to be any markings on yours
A provocation to stop this nonsense
This posting is relating to actual copyright discussions in this forum.
Copyright?
Forget about it, I am not M$, making licenses of every trivial solution with existing techniques like chipclone or t-network for feedback...
I, for myself, just use the chance, to put this thread on top of this forum, no commercial intention!
Hey, dear audio and powerchip friends: save your energies 🙂 Focus on the topic, or everyone of you will get a kind of troll.
BTW: Troll is an expression, coming out from scandinavia, did you know?
Happy ears
Franz
This posting is relating to actual copyright discussions in this forum.
Copyright?
Forget about it, I am not M$, making licenses of every trivial solution with existing techniques like chipclone or t-network for feedback...
I, for myself, just use the chance, to put this thread on top of this forum, no commercial intention!
Hey, dear audio and powerchip friends: save your energies 🙂 Focus on the topic, or everyone of you will get a kind of troll.
BTW: Troll is an expression, coming out from scandinavia, did you know?
Happy ears
Franz
Is that you, Franz? The guy who openly (online), very excited, asked Nick to be included in his page about GC with T-network?
Never heard that about troll. Yes, this is a good place to share the info.
And btw, where do those copyright discussons are?
Never heard that about troll. Yes, this is a good place to share the info.
And btw, where do those copyright discussons are?
Exactly, it is me!
It is a very big difference, to ask to be mentioned or to ask for money.
Did you forget this?
Franz
BTW: Did you try the t-network or did I miss your response?
And who did ask for money?
How do you mean response? You've had my response in the time the whole issue started. Some things I pushed then were later accepted like an explanation of the benefits of the T-network. Do you remember that? Or do you think did I try it and if yes, what is my report?
Oh yes, BTW, you prefer regulated supply with GC? Have you ever and anywhere, talking about it, mentioned from who this issue started?
How do you mean response? You've had my response in the time the whole issue started. Some things I pushed then were later accepted like an explanation of the benefits of the T-network. Do you remember that? Or do you think did I try it and if yes, what is my report?
Oh yes, BTW, you prefer regulated supply with GC? Have you ever and anywhere, talking about it, mentioned from who this issue started?
Franz G said:
Where did you get that idea?
Is that the conclusion you take from reading those threads?
Regulated PS for power amp is nothing new, Pedja. Your is only aplication this principle for GC. By the way, correct designed amp don't need it badly 😎 .
I appreciate that not everybody speaks fluent English. But really, how many times does Pedja have to state that he doesn't claim to have been the first to use a regulated supply, either with the GC or any other amplifier? 😡
Pedja said:
No matter how much I agree with you, you better start a group buy for a regulated PSU or start selling some boards, but don't expect no group buys from anyone when you don't want to start any. That way people will get to know you as well.
I mean, that many problem here rise, because not exist common listening experience, mostly it is only one subjective statement against another subjective statement. All we can to get best sound, but experiences and knowledges aren't the same. I have experience from our czech chat, that people often don't belive claims, but when they comes together for listening, in most cases is 100 % agreement. It should not to be easy, but whatabout to do some " listening meeting ", where we can try it together ? But there must be some different products, not only variation of only one idea - any fan club of one solution. 😎
Upupa Epops said:
I have the same experience, I agree with you.
When the sound is clearly better, when hearing, people soon get there.
There can be some that have a funny taste (like those who like an overly "smooth" and undetailed sound), but most people agree what sounds better.
It is not very exact to explain the sound by words, as it's always very difficult and you are picking words that are valid for yourself, they are obvious for you but not so for others.
I read very funny words on the audio mags.😀
Upupa Epops said:
Of course it's not easy, as we have people from all over the world.
I would be delighted in participating.
Do you pay the trip?😀
- Status
- Not open for further replies.