Hubba Hubba Hubba* , Biesse Rover flat bed CNC router.
And a pretty Electrocompaniet set (ECC1,EC4.7, 2 x AW120 ?)
* : ©Val Resnick, Payback, '99
Another nice "thing".This is a 9,3 litre closed cabinet maded to work into a medium home cinema system.The full range driver can be replaced by a coaxial or 2 way design with a bullet tweeter on top of enclosure...similar to B&W Nautilus concept.
I prefer to called a Mini-Nautilus system.Soon will be available for sale.
I prefer to called a Mini-Nautilus system.Soon will be available for sale.
Attachments
OB Photos
See attached photos: Drivers are old Seas 11FGX and the tweeter is a Dynaudio Esotec D260. Woofer unit still in design phase - twin 8" Aurasound NS8-385 in a transmission line cabinet.
See attached photos: Drivers are old Seas 11FGX and the tweeter is a Dynaudio Esotec D260. Woofer unit still in design phase - twin 8" Aurasound NS8-385 in a transmission line cabinet.
Attachments
Last edited:
Oops the sequel:
The wood is Paldao from the Philippines. It is a very hard wood that can have some "curly" figure.
The wood is Paldao from the Philippines. It is a very hard wood that can have some "curly" figure.
Very nice stuff felixx, I'll probably end up buying some stuff from you 🙂
The full range in the mini-nautilus is the supravox?
The full range in the mini-nautilus is the supravox?
Scan speak 26W/4867T00 + 12MU/4731T00 and R3004/662001
My active loudspeakers ;
My active loudspeakers ;
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Built them last year:
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
@blue audio
nice. those tang band look sweet. how do they sound? (i'm planning on using the same full rangers 🙂 )
nice. those tang band look sweet. how do they sound? (i'm planning on using the same full rangers 🙂 )
The drivers I´ve used are
Tweeter: NeoPro5i.
Mid: Tang Band W5-1611.
Woofer:Tang Band W69-1042.
The cabinets are sealed. I am using a four channel class D poweramp from Hifiakademie with a DSP to "drive" those Speakers. The DSP splits the signal by TMT and Woofer. The TMTs have a normal crossover. So it is a "semi-active" system.
Despite the fact, that the Tang bands are "cheap speakers" this system sounds clear, "homogenous" with a precise bass.
I am more than happy. Even folks with "off the shelve" speakers with 4 times higher prices are impressed.
But I have to say the biggest challenge to build them was the incredible low WAF factor 😀
Last edited:
The WAF was got my attention. I am surprised that you risked mating a very expensive tweeter (instead of TB's RT-1516S) to much cheaper woofers and midranges. The Neo5 might have cost as much as the other 4 drivers (2 mids and 2 woofers) put together.
It seems to have worked. Congratulations.
Last edited:
