Attachments
It is a hugely big deal when religions are treated as, well, gospel. One can believe anything based upon faith, which has proved to be divisive and deadly.no big deal either way.
Curious about the "mount Everest" mention .... I reread the Bible and couldn´t find that name anywhere ... isn´t this also a Narrator´s add-on just to prove a point? 😉
I'm sure you have not just re-read the bible just to ensure there was no mention of Everest, but I take your point. Genesis 7:20, NIV: The waters rose and covered the mountains to a depth of more than fifteen cubits. Unless Everest popped up after the flood, it was, by definition, inundated by it, ie 5-mile deep water covering the planet.
The "the lack of context shown by critics of ancient writings" is an acceptable complaint, but again, religious types live their lives by such ancient writings and interpret them to their own ends. I have read the verse and decided that it means that the flood covered all the mountains on earth. You have interpreted it differently to fit your narrative. One would have thought that if these writings were indeed the words of gods that they would be a little less ambiguous...
If the waters rose to an altitude of 1,000' or 10,000' or 30,000' that would lift the base of the atmosphere to that same altitude, at which normal atmospheric pressure should be found.
Dear klinky friend, nice to talk and even argue with you but for starters, please do not use straw arguments with me or put words in my mouth I didn´t pronounce.You have interpreted it differently to fit your narrative. One would have thought thatthat they would be a little less ambiguous...
Did I treat the Bible as gospel?It is a hugely big deal when religions are treated as, well, gospel. One can believe anything based upon faith, which has proved to be divisive and deadly.
Where? Would you be so kind as to quote me?
Did I even mention the word "Faith?"
Where? Would you be so kind as to quote me?
You mean reread it in, say, 1hour, just to refute a Forum question?I'm sure you have not just re-read the bible just to ensure there was no mention of Everest,
Where would you pull that klinky idea from?
"Re-read" means, literally, read it more than once.
As in: "I might have missed the Everest mention the first time, but not if re-reading" 😉
But that´s just a literary figure to enhance my point, much deeper is that having a modest Cultural background under my belt, I have a fair idea of what was known or not in Bible times.
THIS includes any "world" which might have been mentioned there.
This is what none less than Herodotus, the Father of History and Geography in the modern sense, knew way back then:
Herodotus World, 500 B.C.
Care to point at Mount Everest for me?
Oh, NO, PLEASE, you hurt my eyes.Genesis 7:20, NIV: The waters rose and covered the mountains to a depth of more than fifteen cubits. Unless Everest popped up after the flood, it was, by definition, inundated by it, ie 5-mile deep water covering the planet.
Are you stating they knew they lived on "a planet"??? Wow!!!
Please follow me on this:
first you state:
and immediately after you confess to being a "religious type" yourself, because:religious types live their lives by such ancient writings and interpret them to their own ends.
If that´s not an "interpretation", and obviously "to your own ends" ... then what is it?I have read the verse and decided that it means that the flood covered all the mountains on earth
This is getting better minute by minute.
Again pulling your straw arguments.if these writings were indeed the words of gods
To the point of being repetitive:
Where? Would you be so kind as to quote me?
Just as a refresher, I wrote:
"catastrophic events , also mentioned in dozens of Cultures around the Mediterranean, including Egyptians, Greeks, Sumerians, etc. , and even as far as China 😱 car reasonably be matched (at least in date and sheer physical impact) to the HUGE Santorini/Thera volcano explosion, some 1600BC" ... which happened to be an event, i.e. "fact"
Very well studied, by the way.
I suggest reading the excellent: https://www.amazon.com/Santorini-Volcano-Natural-History-Mythology/dp/8779345050
To call it eye-opening is the understatement of the year.
Just as a side note: so called "skepticism" or "free thinking" has gone full circle and become a close minded wannabe "religion" by itself, with its own Myths and strict rules.
Oh well.
I thought it was 377 Ohms. Learn something new every day, or not
lolI was referring specifically to his belief in the farcical biblical story of Noah and his ark, and Mt. Everest under '15 cubits' of water, not reality...
erik van Dainken
You forgot to ask THE Question: .... did they save fish in their own fish tanks on the Ark?????I should have posted this earlier, but fear I may now have missed the boat! 😀
😉 😉 😉
More seriously: I would very much forgive these poor people for believing "everything was covered by water"
Also: what would they think when finding this on mountaintops????
‘’π÷9 = 0.349
this entry point promotes Helmholtz resonance. having the driver entry perfectly at this point facilitates the harmonics with double and triple the wavelength of the fundamental, especially when the TL has 2 folds (3 sections), which causes reinforcement of the fundamental through harmonic subtraction. the reinforcement is perceived as the difference between the double and triple wavelength and thus our ear hears an additional 'ghost' fundamental, or rather a boost of that frequency. the frequencies in the box are not 'fighting' each other but rather coalescing on every node in the TL. it's like the Tacoma Narrows bridge, resonance became so strong the entire structure started waving. this is ideally what one would want, smaller-scale, in a TL’’
i gave up on my own words
and hired a translator 😂
this entry point promotes Helmholtz resonance. having the driver entry perfectly at this point facilitates the harmonics with double and triple the wavelength of the fundamental, especially when the TL has 2 folds (3 sections), which causes reinforcement of the fundamental through harmonic subtraction. the reinforcement is perceived as the difference between the double and triple wavelength and thus our ear hears an additional 'ghost' fundamental, or rather a boost of that frequency. the frequencies in the box are not 'fighting' each other but rather coalescing on every node in the TL. it's like the Tacoma Narrows bridge, resonance became so strong the entire structure started waving. this is ideally what one would want, smaller-scale, in a TL’’
i gave up on my own words
and hired a translator 😂
🤦🏼🤦🏼You forgot to ask THE Question: .... did they save fish in their own fish tanks on the Ark?????
😉 😉 😉
More seriously: I would very much forgive these poor people for believing "everything was covered by water"
" as the waves travel inland, they build up to higher and higher heights as the depth of the ocean decreases. The speed of tsunami waves depends on ocean depth rather than the distance from the source of the wave. Tsunami waves may travel as fast as jet planes over deep waters, only slowing down when reaching shallow waters. "
Also: what would they think when finding this on mountaintops????
View attachment 1082491
Apparently it’s contagious if you look dumb@ss😝😝 you’re so ego (and not otherwise ) so it’s Transparency is phenomenal.Your blunt mind does-not-get-sarcasm.
Not surprising. 😉
unfortunate and Not actually something that’s funny when it’s truly considered as your reality. that’s where the jokes over and I don’t wanna say anything more at your expense because it’s not fair or appropriate. I wish I could help you or be of some value in this way that’s an honest response. people in your scenario are Truly at a significant disadvantage and maybe it’s something to consider
i gave up on my own words
and hired a translator 😂
It seems that even your translator is unaware that every sentence should begin with a capital letter.
It would make your contributions easier to read if you adopted that convention.
Just sayin'. Hope it's helpful 😉
I speak into a dayton audio IMM6 microphone plugged into an iPhone headphone jack. just sayin… 🙏🏻It seems that even your translator is unaware that every sentence should begin with a capital letter.
It would make your contributions easier to read if you adopted that convention.
Just sayin'. Hope it's helpful 😉
In any case, sentence start or not, "I" is always capitalized when mentioning yourself.
You´d better update your Iphone Speech Recognition feature 😉i gave up on my own words
Can I have some of the mushrooms your on?why wouldn’t there be a generic standard just like there is for the speed of light?
And if there was at 345.6 m/s then substantiate the connection to time as 86 400 seconds , 1440 min 24 hours , 1 day
864 hz is 1 meter in 1/4 wave, 345.6 (0.25m) and 4 days. as reciprocating ratio that extends into everything the pivot off of one.
1
2
4
8
16
32
64
128
256
512
1
0.5
0.25
0.125
0.0625
0.03125
0.015625
0.00783125
0.00390625
0.0019503125
0.0009876…
and we can notice an inch to centimeters conversion:
1meter is 39.37007874015748031496..”
2 is 7874
4 is 15748
8 is 31496
16 is 62992
32 is 125984
64 is 251968
128 is 50393(6??) loss of 1
256 is 100787(2?) loss of 2
512 is 201574(4??) loss of 4
1024 is 40314(88??) loss of 8
2048 is 80629(76??) loss of 16
4096 is 161258(52?) loss of 32
0.62012165 vs
0.62011735
0.62 is 1/x ( 1.6129032258064516(then repeats after the 645.16…
now the centimeters is suspicious, but it should be because it’s directly connected to the motor the second and the speed of light at all times, And those are kind of screwy anyhow because if you look at your version to an inch is leaving off all of those decimal points all the time and those decimals are repetitive nature and foreshadowing to the next?
But they’re also directly related to the same number they are in’pi’ numbers???
8÷2.54 is 3.1 496(Plus the missing 0.00000062992…) as pi is 3.1416( 0.0080 difference).
if we look at a squared plus B squared equals C squared we notice using three as the speed of light or similar the combination
3 - 0.75 is 2.25
(1728)^2 - (864)^2 is (1496.492)^2
86400 x2 - 86400 is 86400sqrt 3.
The Pythagorean theorem is originally a description of time over distance at 30°?
0.5236 or 12 on 6.9375 Can be doubled and see it again in a 300 cm offset driver qw pipe fix the notch at 86.4 Hz and transferred all the way to the one at 144 Hz???
why are those numbers
300 x 0.3490658
as 104.72 and 195.28 cm
which is the reciprocal if divided together of 1.8648 and the reciprocal of 03490658 and 300 is 2.8648. if you run out the decimal points on both of those they are infinite it seems?
and if you use pi divided by nine and pi divided by three to maintain high level of accuracy you’ll see I need a more accurate version.
If you take us 360 cm pipe and you put drivers at 30 cm exactly I need side pipes running parallel 180 cm each, It will tune to 28.8 it will remove the 86.4 notch and it will go up to 144 and depending on the drivers TS parameters it may not be too shabby looking i.e. flat.
what does G is completely annihilate 864 Hz and every inch of all of it at 288 hz over and over and over again in Peak or ultimate cancel over and over.
and those numbers end up being units of time as well but they’re also the radius and diameter of the moon and sun almost precisely into miles in kilometers already?
And technically that 144 Hz seems to end up at about 149.6 If you look through the details of a simulation tool at a impedance or phase or SPL landmark everything has a unique connection to one word under further investigation because they very well define description of specific things in our existing solar system at the very least also showing why some are quite peculiar where they are currently an orbital mean radius , you notice the same exact numbers as the distance to the moon or the distance it is traveling away logarithmically scale down(3.84cm 384,000km).
If all of these things are coincidenceRight now then what were they 66 million years ago
Sure they’re located@ wikipedia.com. Amongst just about any other similar reference material or? including research gate….Can I have some of the mushrooms your on?
and any number of podcasts or YouTube videos with frank Wilzeck, bret wei nstein, matthew johnson, roger penrose, jim gates, dianna walsh, Avi loeb, stephen wolfram, donald hoffman…. Do I really need to go on? There is a contagious amount of ignorance or simply lack of effort into / and of understanding things outside of tiny windows in comfortable breakfast nooks it seems…
I can’t change that you have to do it yourself at the same time I don’t claim at all to have encountered a great deal of significant information that somehow validates the above statement fairly either.. but I’m beginning to wonder if and when….
Last edited:
Sadly, among other problems, one of "word salad" characteristics is speaking for a Looooonnnngggg time without pauses.Maybe pause between sentences then?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_salad
Also, a troll might do it on purpose, just to annoy thread readers:
Deliberate use
Narcissistic word salad is a type of purposefully confusing speech, using circular reasoning, logical fallacies and other rhetorical devices to disorient and manipulate a person or group
Again, not yet sure we are dealing with a troll or a mental case.
Another possibility is we are dealing with a computer genius who:
Emphasis on "entertainment". 😱In computing
Word salad can be generated by a computer program for entertainment purposes
Some of the posts above don´t look too different from:
The Head And In Frontal Attack On An English Writer That The Character Of This Point Is Therefore Another Method For The Letters That The Time Of Who Ever Told The Problem For An Unexpected.
Markov chains can be used to generate random but somewhat human-looking sentences. This is used in some chat-bots, especially on IRC-networks.
Nonsensical phrasing can also be generated for more malicious reasons, such as the Bayesian poisoning used to counter Bayesian spam filters by using a string of words which have a high probability of being collocated in English, but with no concern for whether the sentence makes sense grammatically or logically.
You got it all wrong. But I’m content if you are.Sadly, among other problems, one of "word salad" characteristics is speaking for a Looooonnnngggg time without pauses.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_salad
Also, a troll might do it on purpose, just to annoy thread readers:
Again, not yet sure we are dealing with a troll or a mental case.
Another possibility is we are dealing with a computer genius who:
Emphasis on "entertainment". 😱
Some of the posts above don´t look too different from:
i Apologize to anyone who was reading this thread or in the future if it interest you and continue to be derailed by people who have no real interest or simply are oblivious to so many incredible things it’s almost a travestApologize to anyone who was reading this thread orders in the future if it interest you and continue to be derailed by people who have no real interest or simply are oblivious to so many incredible things it’s almost a tragic?
^^ look auto correct glitch? ^^
Insertion of the repetition of already spelled out sentences even as i watching real time as it does it …
it’s really entertaining but I even left it there so U could use it . U need ammunition thats real, You’re boring when you only shoot blanks
You’re phenomenal when you’re quoting info and … sharing it. almost as if you’re trying to be useful but then, accidentally, being extremely useful? Completely serious you’re like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde in the clown and retard version. Either way there’s a lot to appreciate
Last edited:
You misspelled iPhone.In any case, sentence start or not, "I" is always capitalized when mentioning yourself.
You´d better update your Iphone Speech Recognition feature 😉

- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- speed of sound reference