speed of sound reference

JM Fahey childish is a spot-on description as that little numero-poetical gem goes back about 65 years for me and I was even more childish then than now. Disclaimer: My wife of 44 years wasn't there but she does not believe I could possibly have been more childish in the remote past than I am now.
Just remember, you are only young once, but you can remain immature indefinitely.
 
Could you share test data to show us this?
we’re talking about things that have been around since the 1930s and transmission lines and even then exposed and shapes used in antenna theiry .

This is just the results of taking advantage of information and technology available / accessible today and picking up where Harry Olsen let off in the 40s Inferior transducers or lack of what we can buy and easily acquired today

My simulations and electrical impedance(measured results) matching 10ths of centimeters or hz , if you will. the Higher order section in the highe not just the initial
 
I used to do transmission lines and antennas for a living. All good stuff. And important to match electrical impedances exactly to avoid unwanted reflections and group delay.

Trying to relate one physical constant to another is a topic that fascinates Physicists. Always seeking the pattern.

All looks quite promising with the Vacuum Permittivity:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_permittivity

The impedance of free space is 337 Ohms, IIRC.

Half wave Dipole antennas depend on this, but you get an imprecise 73 ohms, or 292 ohms for a folded dipole. It's also slightly inductive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antenna

Epsilon nought is e^2 / 2 x alpha x h x c where Epsilon nought is the electrical permittivity of free space, e is the charge on the electron, alpha is the fine structure constant, h is Planck's constant and C the speed of light.

Trouble is that nobody knows why dimensionless alpha, is about 1 / 137! No discernable pattern at all really! 😕

Whenever you see Epsilon nought, you tend to find a 4 Pi factor, because it is a 3D thing. If you replace h with h bar, your 4 Pi is there. In 4D General Relativity you get an 8 Pi. And 2 pi tends to crop up in 2D circular problems. This is called dimensional analysis.

At the extreme it is used in Planck units, which attempt to express one constant in terms of others:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units

Another bizarre relationship which seems to work is the Koide formula in mass ratios of the 3 generations of Leptons, the electron, the muon and the Tau. Involves factors of 2/3 and the square root of mass..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula

Not proven. But interesting.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Booger weldz
I used to do transmission lines and antennas for a living. All good stuff. And important to match electrical impedances exactly to avoid unwanted reflections and group delay.

Trying to relate one physical constant to another is a topic that fascinates Physicists. Always seeking the pattern.

All looks quite promising with the Vacuum Permittivity:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_permittivity

The impedance of free space is 337 Ohms, IIRC.

Half wave Dipole antennas depend on this, but you get an imprecise 73 ohms, or 292 ohms for a folded dipole. It's also slightly inductive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antenna

Epsilon nought is e^2 / 2 x alpha x h x c where Epsilon nought is the electrical permittivity of free space, e is the charge on the electron, alpha is the fine structure constant, h is Planck's constant and C the speed of light.

Trouble is that nobody knows why dimensionless alpha, is about 1 / 137! No discernable pattern at all really! 😕

Whenever you see Epsilon nought, you tend to find a 4 Pi factor, because it is a 3D thing. If you replace h with h bar, your 4 Pi is there. In 4D General Relativity you get an 8 Pi. And 2 pi tends to crop up in 2D circular problems. This is called dimensional analysis.

At the extreme it is used in Planck units, which attempt to express one constant in terms of others:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units

Another bizarre relationship which seems to work is the Koide formula in mass ratios of the 3 generations of Leptons, the electron, the muon and the Tau. Involves factors of 2/3 and the square root of mass..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula

Not proven. But interesting.
you’re too advanced for me… but i learn from you always.👍🏻💚

why is 104.72 the exact location for driver entry in a 300 cm ‘qw resonator’ to fill in the void that starts at 86.4 hz? (100 cm)
 
you’re too advanced for me… but i learn from you always.👍🏻💚

why is 104.72 the exact location for driver entry in a 300 cm ‘qw resonator’ to fill in the void that starts at 86.4 hz? (100 cm)
note the sq rt of every other is useful in the:

0.9375
1.875
3.75
7.5
15
30
60
120
240
48
96
192
384
768
1536
3072
6144

i use a generic reference base of ‘time as seconds in groups)

13.5
27
54
108
216
432
864
1728
3456
6912
13824
27648
55296


4330127 as 432

(0.8660254) as 864

(1.7320508) as 1728

3.464 1016 as 3456

69282032 as 6912…
 
Last edited:
sq rt of 0.75, 3, 12, etc
when you’re blind and ignorant and chase things unknowingly you end up finding stuff potentially that’s important.

but without the proper vocabulary or scientific jargon to explain that are sharing a properly it looks or sounds stupid no matter what…

this is a conundrum and some areas of the DIY community that are discredited for obvious reasons still seem to allow the discovery of things due to the pursuit of excess or even impossible?

that’s still like what races on Sunday eventually sells on Monday. As
sq rt of 0.75, 3, 12, etc
I often wonder if the fact that the meter and the second the speed of light are essentially stuck together in a uniform definition if that’s why these other numbers are so critical which are essentially a wave form of speed of light numbers or the quarter wave parts over and over again in both directions bigger or smaller??
 
"Looking for correlations" is fine, and a very Human trait, which has led us into at least a hundred thousand years path of Evolution.

That said, it can be overdone to the point where it becomes more of a handicap than an advantage.

Pure Abstraction can be a powerful tool but in my book at some point it "should" be applicable to better understand the World around us; if not it may fall in the "nice to know" category but not much further.
 
"Looking for correlations" is fine, and a very Human trait, which has led us into at least a hundred thousand years path of Evolution.

That said, it can be overdone to the point where it becomes more of a handicap than an advantage.

Pure Abstraction can be a powerful tool but in my book at some point it "should" be applicable to better understand the World around us; if not it may fall in the "nice to know" category but not much further.
Your skepticism would be a powerful tool and an excellent filter if it wasn’t periodically misdirected with some sort of personal agenda ….??🤷🏻 (likely not a fair description..)

if you could steer your intuition or whatever it is in the right direction you might find it much more useful instead of what just appears to be a bully behind a keyboard(no offense) ?

you have great potential obviously no one needs to tell you that least of all me. but get off the hate machine before you miss out on so many more things already? I don’t necessarily know that you do however your hasty remarks and quick to jump on a bandwagon or try to form some sort of lynch mob mentality is awkward to say the least.


The moment that doesn’t exist but your skepticism still does you are like a scalpel through things that need filtering no doubt cutting out the fake nonsense or ?? what Ever needs to be removed as snake oil , etc
 
Number one time doesn’t even exist or ever is of any significance.

It only matters because we are born into a world that has a dark and a light. Based on the fact that this planet rotates and nothing else matters in that respect or ever would. unique to our perspective and the other creatures that live amongst us or used to in many cases…

so all of this is essentially nonsense it doesn’t matter anyway, it’s all fake it’s not at all real neither is anything we are sitting on or looking at that is a gigantic amount of empty space in between the nucleus and the area which electrons exist?

it’s a magnetic force it’s not touch it’s some sort of resonating energy that makes color thanks to the cone and rod stuff and the workings of the on/off daily function optic nerve??? and the same with hearing…

21.6 hz -21600?

17.28-17280?

14.4-14400?

just hearing, Wrap that up to megahertz and now you’re in visible light but realize what exist beyond that is something you can’t even feel or ever even understand but with nearly 30 minutes of exposure in that realm and frequency you’re dead and there’s nothing you can do about it(Chernobyl )


none of this exists not even in the slightest.

so to argue any of these things or to call one more significant than the other is borderline ludicrous already.

Also consider the whole entire system of mathematics and formal education designed around a system that promotes and creates trainable factory workers for an agenda during the industrial revolution.

Not much if anything ever changed because it ended up being such a lucrative system when you enslaved people as tax revenue and force them to buy into their own existence from the moment they’re born they are on the planet that they own nothing somehow and can’t even exist otherwise, and you own everyone that does then to a great extent…

how do you explain these things without diving into these areas expose much of this already(depending on your own personal perspective or willingness to dive into the numbers and play with them and give them a reason to exist???)

Once you’re there and you let it happen you reach a point where you realize in between all of these numbers which nearly repeat the same over and over only slightly changed along the way in doubling or having any any directioOnce you’re there and you let it happen you reach a point where you realize in between all of these numbers which nearly repeat the same over and over only slightly changed along the way in doubling or halving n either direction …

what actually exists that we’re not even possibly aware of at this very moment at any place or time is_______?

essentially the equivalent of a more realistic version of said ‘paralell universe?(potential here is endless)


Consider 30° the Paralex angle of the speed of light ? (for any reason just to see what there is to see if geometric shapes as a result ) and travel at the speed of light where do you end up if using a hexagon around the sun in a sequence of numbers which can start at 93,750 and go to 187500, 375000, 750000, 15000000, 3000000 , 6000000?

if you look that’s 1968.5, 3937, 7874, 15748, 31496, 62992….125984,251968, 50393(6) or (7)?

starting at 1/2.54 (39.37xxxxx as : 187 plus 3750 (which is 3750÷7 as a reciprocal of exactly 0.1866666666
 
Last edited:
OK, we just went off the rails. If the speed of light is foundational to the Universe and speed is distance divided by time and time doesn't exist, it seems there is no foundation. Unlike before 1905, we now understand that time is not the rigid firmament of the Universe, rather it is a dependent variable, and the speed of light is the actual firmament. But time, while variable like space in the entity called spacetime. surely is real.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Booger weldz
imagine
 

Attachments

  • 49C32A22-FD97-43F1-9F96-1C8DAA4D4252.png
    49C32A22-FD97-43F1-9F96-1C8DAA4D4252.png
    185.7 KB · Views: 66
  • A5B85E65-4233-4C59-838E-8CFAADAC262B.jpeg
    A5B85E65-4233-4C59-838E-8CFAADAC262B.jpeg
    387.5 KB · Views: 66
OK, we just went off the rails. If the speed of light is foundational to the Universe and speed is distance divided by time and time doesn't exist, it seems there is no foundation. Unlike before 1905, we now understand that time is not the rigid firmament of the Universe, rather it is a dependent variable, and the speed of light is the actual firmament. But time, while variable like space in the entity called spacetime. surely is real.
1908 Tunguska event, This cycle is merely a repetition of the Noah’s ark event it only depends whether or not we go through densely populated or thinned out part of the torrid(sp?) meteor belt which we go through every single year at the end of June and Halloween.

It’s rather unpredictable because it’s scattered with such debris that no one pays enough attention to in order to document to the extent of which would save our ***** if we understood the sequence of events not as these gigantic amount of time like the 25,920 years of the procession of the equinox but of slivers of nothingness to the solar system in reality

We’re overdue for this !(?) it should have already taken place (again) and the only reason we’re here right now could very well have to do with our position in the part of the Milky Way that has something to do with more than just Jupiter and Saturn tugging us from or battling the sun. or Sharing an endless amount of rotational intertidal back-and-forth with the moon..

I don’t know there’s so many parts to this story that all are so very relevant but no one pays much attention too.

The interesting part in all this is that it all shows up in high order modes of canceled out frequencies/peak in the ‘perfectly’ aligned compound / tapped qw pipes


ww1/ww2/ vietnam/ desert storm/ 911, Ukraine none of that exists the moment that that 1908 event was merely an hour delayed by whatever travels it made in order to enter the earths atmosphere when and where it did and how lucky that was?? It literally could’ve landed directly on Moscow or Kiev? The world as we know it would be concerned with the sky falling and chicken little would be a reality instead of all of this nonsense and wargames and US taxpayers funding someone else’s lucrative business of making the solutions to fake problems of weapons of mass destruction in countries that don’t need this fake humanitarian effort that’s presented in the big fat lie.

this is where it all leads if starting at 3.375,6.75,13.5 hz 27,54,108,216,432,864 And in between (pic) ??


in this case 7.2hz as a full wave of 28.8 hz where the quarter harmonic is stolen from effectively? look at all those numbers and they’re all accounted for The pressure node or antinode over and over You look at the details of horn response… (PH1 ( phi ironically) mode

offset 360 cm split as 30/30 from each end in parallel . or series if every other is not ‘perfect ‘ so to speak (hard to explain, I’m sorry)
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    588.6 KB · Views: 61
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    610.4 KB · Views: 56
Last edited:
1.7320508
Do you believe this actually happened?
the rapid melting of the wisconsin glacier and 2 miles of ice above the ‘great lakes’ .the pacific northwest, scablands , mississippi river delta, all of the greenland impact crater and the south carolina divots from reentry of the displaced ice/debri.. younger dryas event, dilution of ocean water is crazy at that time with the fresh water insertion

100%
 

Attachments

  • 2830EFDC-0DC4-4FB2-BB3C-6CA8C13B0CEF.jpeg
    2830EFDC-0DC4-4FB2-BB3C-6CA8C13B0CEF.jpeg
    372.5 KB · Views: 54
  • 7E3B949C-843D-4A65-B98D-709E6A32077A.jpeg
    7E3B949C-843D-4A65-B98D-709E6A32077A.jpeg
    711.4 KB · Views: 59
  • 6AB8DD8E-B6C4-48A3-B593-D3C29CF15E98.jpeg
    6AB8DD8E-B6C4-48A3-B593-D3C29CF15E98.jpeg
    590.1 KB · Views: 54
Last edited: