Some speaker driver measurements...

I know why you say that but is there really such a thing as 4pi in a living room? Presumably there is a back wall that must provide some reinforcement at LF albeit with a somewhat more complex frequency response (ripples maybe).

I have wondered about that but don’t have the resources to measure it.

It depends on the size of the speaker and then distance to side walls. The room will add in some reinforcement but only at the lower frequencies. If you're working with a narrow design then bafflestep starts quite high up in frequency. I wouldn't say you would need the full 6dB, but you can definitely need 4-5dB.
 
Those estimates are not quite correct. Bass is not getting as much loss due to the floor gain (back walls are another story). That's only lower midrange that is getting full baffle step. All depends on baffle and transducer placement.

Of course. But we're talking about a narrow stand mount design. You only get appreciable floor gain to the bass when the bass driver is mounted close to the floor and the front baffle extends down to the floor as well.
 
It's called Paiyon DM6A-82-10P. It's not a copy of ATC but surely inspired. Poor motor by the looks anyway.


O1CN01vaRhMP2LEn09tkw6u_!!18069661.jpg_2200x2200Q50s50.jpg_.webp
O1CN01czvG3P2LEn09U6KNN_!!18069661.jpg_2200x2200Q50s50.jpg_.webp
 
Log into Facebook
-Huge conclusions based on ? If you look at the loudspeakers they have put this into I suspect it would actually be a very good driver -remember China landed on the far side of the moon, the leader in Ai and has all the rare earths needed to make any magnet structure they want - so why would they make this a poor design? Anyway I value your opinions.
Paiyon are not a company that just slaps any old driver in a box -the P82 crossover looks very well designed to extremely tight tolerances. And to go to all that effort of using their own drivers when they have a good relationship with Peerless.
Anyway this company is just starting its upward trajectory - perhaps in 10 years they may amaze us all
The smaller 3 way P81se also using this driver Log into Facebook
 
Motor issue is no copper cap or shorting rings. Impedance starts rising at only 1500Hz and is 50 ohms by 20KHz. With a good motor this driver could have flat output to above 10KHz (on axis)

Original ATC SM75 had no copper shorting either. It is an underhung motor with saturated magnetic field in the gap. Distortion is low from a dual suspension, and the impedance and response of the "copy" is actually rather similar to the SM75, I imagine it is a very well performing driver. In any case, I won't be purchasing this one or the SM75 as the price does not make sense to me.
 
Last edited:
It would be Very distressing buying a pair and they were rubbish! It is not cheap and with Australian customs ability to destroy your goods and not be liable probably too risky for me - happened to several people I know personally 🙁
However if the company had them tested independently that might make them worth trying
 
Original ATC SM75 is so old now whatever patent was on it has expired many moons ago. Many people can "reverse engineer" anything, or what's that saying... standing on the shoulder of giants?

I'm sure it a good driver but nothing groundbreaking.

What both the ATC and Purifi, Scan-Speak etc have shown is that paying attention to the soft parts eg. suspension, spider, surround, cone are all very important terms of distortion producing mechanisms. I recall Tang Band can some kind of spider-less dual cone driver called RBM, IIRC @Maynardg tested to be the lowest distortion 8" he'd ever measured.
Sadly it's not longer available to DIYers, only OEM...


Hopefully with more FEA into the future drivers will get longer stroke and lower distortion.

You have to pay for the privilege, and wait 20 years if you want some kind of cheaper clone...