Small 2 way based on the Scanspeak 15W 8531K00

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've got a couple of pairs of Scanspeak driver here and they all measure different to the Scanspeak datasheets. Mine are well run-in and always warmed up with pink noise before taking measurements. I have a WT2, WT3 and a DATS V2.

Warming or not warming also makes a difference-> higher Qts -> need for bigger box. There is an interesting paper from PHL Audio about this....

Trouble is "low level"/ small signal is too low to give realistic TS params measurements, but question is also what is the correct level ( in Volts) to make a realistic TS measurement? 10mV, 100mV, 1V, 10V?

As said, you can take this the usual and useless theoretical way, or the more useful empirical one, forgetting about sims and build a cheap prototype and test the real thing in real conditions. Best for me, simply wait before applying veneer...
 
Last edited:
Warming or not warming also makes a difference-> higher Qts -> need for bigger box. There is an interesting paper from PHL Audio about this....

That's why I warm them up.


Trouble is "low level"/ small signal is too low to give realistic TS params measurements, but question is also what is the correct level ( in Volts) to make a realistic TS measurement? 10mV, 100mV, 1V, 10V?

Other drivers from different manufacturers that I've measured have pretty much matched the datasheets. It's only Scanspeak that are a long way off.
 
Almost none of the drivers i have measured match the data sheets (100s). But the boxes built from the factory data almost always work as planned.

dave

Some one also wrote a paper on this... Higher Cms makes higher Qts, but also lower Vas, so that things evenly come together.

But some guys also manipulate their data. Consistently build from batch to batch a 5' driver with a Fs of 30Hz ( that is with extremely soft spiders) is not easy, hence possible issues with all parameters badly derailing. And similar issues with magnets.
 

Attachments

  • TS paranoia.png
    TS paranoia.png
    44.6 KB · Views: 416
Ha. These drivers are nearly identical. The K01 just has a smaller magnet. 🙂

The 83dB, 24L vas,0.41 Qts 15w-8530k01
http://www.scan-speak.dk/datasheet/pdf/15w-8530k01.pdf

The 85dB, 24L vas, Qts 0.31 15w-8531k00
http://www.scan-speak.dk/datasheet/pdf/15w-8531k00.pdf

8530 means shiny coated cone, 8531 means uncoated matt finish. K00 and K01 describe magnet size which is more significant for bass tuning.

https://sites.google.com/site/undefinition/carrera

You'd just make the port smaller for the K01, wouldn't you? Or lose it altogether, or line it with felt. And take the tweeter down 2dB. Not rocket science. 😀
 
Last edited:
Firstly I think SS is a very proffesional company who do not try or want to cheet with T/S parameters.

Secondly I have listend some to the SA Pandion 2, which uses the 15W-85xxxxx.
It might be a littel different from the two suggested units, but probably not by much.

My 2 cent is; go for sort of same volume as that Pandion (surely not less) and go for vented (only go for closed if your intention is to use a sub).
With a vent, and enough power, it is simply amazing how much good bass this unit can produce ... and still keeping the mid really detailed and sweet.

/Baldin
 
Got those exact drivers sitting on the table in front of me. Undoped/large magnet. Anyone used with HDS tweet?

I haven't used the 15W8531K00 but have used the 18W8531G00 with the Peerless 810921 and SS D2608/913000. Very nice match and I imagine the 15W would have similar sonics to the 18W. The Peerless worked better than the SS 970000 I used previously but maybe it was just more suitable for the xo type. I had a look and the 15W is not a drop into the xo I used.

The Peerless tweeter does take some work due to the rising response, but a simple zobel (3uF + 5R6) works a treat in an AR series xo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.