Seeking advice on ultrasound transmission rig


2019-12-02 1:33 am
Hello everyone!

I see some stunning homebuilds on these forums.

I wonder if there is anyone out there that can advise me.

I'm trying to make a cost-effective (<$60 if possible) ultrasound transmission beacon: 17.5kHz - 19.5kHz coming from a RaspberryPi.

I need to add an amplifier and a Tweeter.

I found a promising looking tweeter on Amazon here which goes up to 22kHz. Also it only cost $18 for two units.

However I'm not at all sure on the amp.

Can anyone advise?


2019-12-02 1:33 am
Thanks @adason (&#55357;&#56397; on the Osho Avatar, ❤️Osho).

I'm a little concerned about the frequency response smoothness. We are currently transmitting (17.5–19.5)kHz and we need a reasonably flat response within this range. It can be hard to get spec sheets with frequency response curves for low-cost units -- e.g. I can't find a sheet for this one. Nevertheless, it's cheap enough to be worth trying it out, i.e. skip straight to field test.

How would I go about sourcing a suitable amp for that unit? Do I ONLY need to look at the power-rating (in WATTs)? Or do I need to consider the resistance (Ohms) of the driver?


Paid Member
2004-11-10 8:31 pm
pii, do you require flat fr response between 17.5 to 19.5 kHz? how flat? +/- few dB?
piezos will not meet that criteria


  • cts1142-f-size475.gif
    69.5 KB · Views: 72
  • AD43EE63E864BE1BB24D356A31C87181.app1_1498919846270_PZ320.jpeg
    21.3 KB · Views: 71


2019-12-02 1:33 am
So grateful to find this community.

@adason, how are these graphs being generated?
I would like to say "reasonably flat" frequency response across our carrier-band.
We don't have an exact technical requirement; we are at the mercy of the hardware.
There is going to be a performance/cost curve, and I can't pre-empt exactly where on the curve we want to be.